Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

2017-01-16 Thread zimbatm
Nice, thanks On Sun, 15 Jan 2017, 09:12 Benno Fünfstück, wrote: > Cool, that's a really nice feature. With hub, you should be able to do: > > $ hub remote add -p $user > > To get RW access > > zimbatm schrieb am So., 15. Jan. 2017, 00:55: > >

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

2017-01-15 Thread Benno Fünfstück
Cool, that's a really nice feature. With hub, you should be able to do: $ hub remote add -p $user To get RW access zimbatm schrieb am So., 15. Jan. 2017, 00:55: > Actually hub remote only add a read-only git:// remote so it’s not super > useful. The git-extras package

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

2017-01-14 Thread zimbatm
Actually hub remote only add a read-only git:// remote so it’s not super useful. The git-extras package also has a git pr command that populates a pr/$number branch with the pull-request commits. But it doesn’t set the remote

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

2017-01-14 Thread zimbatm
As the person submitting the PR, there is a checkbox (that is checked by default) that grants reviewers access to the branch. As a reviewer, the procedure is to git remote add $user g...@github.com: $user/nixpkgs.git. Checkout the branch and push the commits that you want. Force-push is not

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

2017-01-14 Thread Benno Fünfstück
> Finally during the review, the reviewer was pushing style fixes to the PR. It was probably as quick as leaving a comment and made the whole process much more inclusive, we were actually working together to get this merged. How does this work? Did you need to give him access to your repo for

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

2017-01-06 Thread zimbatm
No not that I know of. It would be awkward to maintain because homebrew expects to be installed in /usr/local and not in the /nix/store. It works the other way around because homebrew casks don't try to maintain anything and just unpack and run an install script. On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 at 19:58 Jörg

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

2017-01-06 Thread zimbatm
Yes that's the package. It installs nix with the nixpkgs-unstable channel. It does basically the same thing as `curl https://nixos.org/nix/install | sh` but also provides an uninstall step. On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 at 19:21 Jörg Thalheim wrote: > Will there be a homebrew package

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

2017-01-06 Thread Jörg Thalheim
I actually mean the other way around. On 2017-01-06 20:57, zimbatm wrote: > Yes that's the package. It installs nix with the nixpkgs-unstable channel. It > does basically the same thing as `curl https://nixos.org/nix/install | sh` > but also provides an uninstall step. > > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

2017-01-06 Thread Jörg Thalheim
Will there be a homebrew package for nixpkgs? On 2017-01-06 19:40, zimbatm wrote: > For the lulz I packaged nix for homebrew cask. Now you can `brew cask install > nix`. Anyways, what I wanted to highlight is that the contributiob process > was quite nice, there are probably some ideas that we

[Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

2017-01-06 Thread zimbatm
For the lulz I packaged nix for homebrew cask. Now you can `brew cask install nix`. Anyways, what I wanted to highlight is that the contributiob process was quite nice, there are probably some ideas that we could take from them. There is a clear path to contribution starting from the README.md