Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

On 11/27/2015 05:00 PM, Tomasz Kontusz wrote: > GitHub should already know about that, is a label useful? It will always be > at least a bit out of date too. Yes github knows about this, but I couldn't find a way to access this information. e.g. filter pull unmergable pull request.

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

GitHub should already know about that, is a label useful? It will always be at least a bit out of date too. Dnia 27 listopada 2015 11:56:04 CET, Matthias Beyer napisał(a): >On 27-11-2015 11:37:54, Pascal Wittmann wrote: >> On 11/22/2015 11:06 PM, Nicolas Pierron wrote:

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

On 11/22/2015 11:06 PM, Nicolas Pierron wrote: > I invite other contributors to join me on this triaging effort, such > that this system is not only made for me. I have just added the label "2.status: merge conflict", to indicate which PRs are unmergable. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

On 27-11-2015 11:37:54, Pascal Wittmann wrote: > On 11/22/2015 11:06 PM, Nicolas Pierron wrote: > > I invite other contributors to join me on this triaging effort, such > > that this system is not only made for me. > > I have just added the label "2.status: merge conflict", to indicate > which

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

Thank you Nicolas for all this hard work! On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Pascal Wittmann wrote: > On 11/22/2015 11:06 PM, Nicolas Pierron wrote: > > For your information, I modified our list of labels, and kept a few > > old one as they do not map directly to any

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

On 11/22/2015 11:06 PM, Nicolas Pierron wrote: > For your information, I modified our list of labels, and kept a few > old one as they do not map directly to any label of the new set. Thank you, good work! > I invite other contributors to join me on this triaging effort, such > that this system

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

For reference, we had a short but closely related discussion about half a year ago: http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/2015-March/016549.html Since then the rate of issues and PRs increased a bit, but their structure hasn't changed significantly, I believe. Vladimir smime.p7s

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

Quoting Vladimír Čunát (2015-11-22 16:16:10) > For reference, we had a short but closely related discussion about half > a year ago: > http://lists.science.uu.nl/pipermail/nix-dev/2015-March/016549.html > > Since then the rate of issues and PRs increased a bit, but their > structure hasn't

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

+1 on the idea, i would include the whole name of the type of tag, eg: status: work-in-progress status: duplicate status: invalid status: wontfix but not holding strong opinion on this. thx for picking this up. -- Rok Garbas - http://www.garbas.si signature.asc Description: signature

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

+1 On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:41 PM, Rok Garbas wrote: > +1 on the idea, i would include the whole name of the type of tag, eg: > > status: work-in-progress > status: duplicate > status: invalid > status: wontfix > > but not holding strong opinion on this. thx for picking this

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

On 21-11-2015 20:16:51, Shea Levy wrote: > +1 for the general idea. Same here. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Kind regards, Matthias Beyer Proudly sent with mutt. Happily signed with gnupg. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ nix-dev mailing

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

This is a pretty good article about organizing issue tags: https://robinpowered.com/blog/best-practice-system-for-organizing-and-tagging-github-issues/ -- Jascha Geerds j...@ekby.de ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

For your information, I modified our list of labels, and kept a few old one as they do not map directly to any label of the new set. Thanks for the link, now I recall reading this on the mailing list, I think have a target system makes sense, as well as having a package-class. On the other hand,

[Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

Hi everybody, I spent a day doing triage of newly created bugs and I think the labels [1] of our repository are currently a big mess. I think the meaning of our labels are not clear for multiple reasons. I will take a few examples to illustrate my point, and then propose a solution to fix that.

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS/Nixpkgs repository labels

No opinion on the specifics of colors/categories, but +1 for the general idea. On 2015-11-21 19:59, Nicolas Pierron wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I spent a day doing triage of newly created bugs and I think the > labels [1] of our repository are currently a big mess. I think the > meaning of our