Man this is a fun ride :) Nice build setup I must say.
Question: The manifest scripts add sane names for the packages (converting
- to _), but nix supports - in names now, so should those be removed?
I have a lot compiled already but baloo was added amongst other things, so
it is not a
On 06/02/2014 04:59 PM, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
A bit more:
* Copy kde-4.12 to kde-4.13.
* Download all of KDE locally, via wget -r
http://download.kde.org/stable/4.13.1; or something like that.
* Run kde-package/kde-manifest.sh and l10n/l10n-manifest.sh to update all the
version numbers and
I'll add it.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/02/2014 04:59 PM, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
A bit more:
* Copy kde-4.12 to kde-4.13.
* Download all of KDE locally, via wget -r
http://download.kde.org/stable/4.13.1; or something like that.
* Run
Maybe nixpkgs deserves its own website.
I for one am not interested in NixOS at this point, but I can see it
have a much larger impact and user base than nixpkgs (think mobile
platform).
Nixpkg consumers are probably less sensitive to the lookfeel of
a website, so that site could be pretty
On 06/03/2014 01:16 PM, Pjotr Prins wrote:
Maybe nixpkgs deserves its own website.
I'm quite against separating nixpkgs from nixos, on the contrary.
My intuition is that nixpkgs makes more than half of what nixos is; even
when putting aside the fact that nixos expressions also reside in
Hi,
On 03/06/14 13:16, Pjotr Prins wrote:
Maybe nixpkgs deserves its own website.
It already has: http://nixos.org/nixpkgs/
It's not much though, and I'm not sure if it makes sense to make it very
prominent. For instance, if you'd want to lure people away from Homebrew, it
would make more
On 01/06/2014 17:17, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
Dear Luca,
Thanks for your response.
What commit of nixpkgs are you tracking?
How do I find that out?
I installed Nix using the install script, not the from source
installation. So, I never manually checked out any package list.
I ran the
Hi.
On 05/29/2014 03:08 PM, Sander van der Burg - EWI wrote:
I don't know if anyone is in favour of getting these changes merged
upstream? Our current policy is that Cygwin is not officially
supported. But if that doesn't matter, I can file a pull request so
that anyone can benefit from these
On 06/01/2014 03:53 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk wrote:
My ~/.nixpkgs/config.nix is as follows:
###
{ pkgs }:
{ packageOverrides = self: with pkgs; rec {
ghc = self.ghc // {
ghcHEAD = callPackage /home/shana/programming/ghc {};
};
}; }
###
What I think it does is overrides
On 06/03/2014 12:03 PM, Wout Mertens wrote:
I'll add it.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/02/2014 04:59 PM, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
A bit more:
* Copy kde-4.12 to kde-4.13.
* Download all of KDE locally, via wget -r
Hi!
I was trying to create a hoogle database with 'hoogle data', but there
is no way to specify where to write the database to. So I get the
following error:
''
hoogle:
/nix/store/jl9j7s3s69q8l1imr9caxbxfc4cpg2g9-haskell-hoogle-ghc7.6.3-4.2.32/share/hoogle-4.2.32/databases:
createDirectory:
Hi,
For single-user implementations we have this:
https://github.com/nilcons/ceh
In our startup we actively use this on several workstations and servers
with Debian/Ubuntu base systems.
This is less ambitious than your ideas, but worked very well for us.
Gergely
On Thu, 29 May 2014 17:28:48
use -d parameter of hoogle.
Gergely
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:22:15 +0100, Thomas Strobel ts...@cam.ac.uk writes:
Hi!
I was trying to create a hoogle database with 'hoogle data', but there
is no way to specify where to write the database to. So I get the
following error:
''
hoogle:
Ok indeed I can reproduce it. Can you please report a bug in nixpkgs?
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/new
Thanks for confirming it.
Here's the link to the issue:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/2818
Cheers!
On 3 June 2014 14:53, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously systemd would then have to not do things that udev etc are
already doing... Just running services, opening sockets, handling cgroups...
I doubt systemd can do this.
First of all, with the new kernel cgroups interface only PID 1 can manage
cgroups (on the kernel level).
Then, to
I am trying to build Nix-1.7 from a bootstrapped nix build and get
env TMPDIR=/var/tmp /home/cog/pprins/nix-boot/bin/nix-env -f nixpkgs/ -iA nix
(...)
++ nix-build dependencies.nix -o
/var/tmp/nix-build-nix-1.7.drv-0/nix-1.7/tests/test-tmp/result
download-from-binary-cache.pl: cannot
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Kirill Elagin kirela...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously systemd would then have to not do things that udev etc are
already doing... Just running services, opening sockets, handling cgroups...
I doubt systemd can do this.
First of all, with the new kernel cgroups
I really don't like that Nixpkgs is being buried in favor of NixOS. More
people using Nixpkgs = more bugs found+fixed, more packages, newer
versions, more switches to NixOS.
Nixpkgs is a stepping stone.
Why point Homebrew users to Nix? They only want to have an nginx install,
or a more recent
18 matches
Mail list logo
