On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:39:34 +0200
Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hydra has and uses priorities. Anyway, building OpenSSL itself is very
quick, but rebuilding all that (transitively) depends on it is worse.
And there are CVE fixes for stdenv stuff sometimes (glibc)...
Yes, and the
On 06/06/2014 08:59 AM, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
When we use priorities generously we could avoid a lot of delay even in less
critical cases.
The main problem I see is that normally you don't want to release a
channel until *all* parts have rebuilt.
We do have meta.schedulingPriority, but
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/06/2014 08:59 AM, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
When we use priorities generously we could avoid a lot of delay even in
less critical cases.
The main problem I see is that normally you don't want to release a
channel
Hey Ricardo!
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 06:24:55PM +0200, Ricardo M. Correia wrote:
If the problem is indeed the setfacl failure (as it appears to be), I think
you need to enable ACLs in ZFS by doing:
zfs set acltype=posixacl fs, where fs is the ZFS dataset/filesystem
which contains your
When we use priorities generously we could avoid a lot of delay even in
less critical cases.
The main problem I see is that normally you don't want to release a
channel until *all* parts have rebuilt.
+1 Rebuilding for a server that runs, say ssh, apache, nginx, postfix and a
few such
Alexander Kjeldaas a...@formalprivacy.com writes:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/06/2014 08:59 AM, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
When we use priorities generously we could avoid a lot of delay even in
less critical cases.
The main problem I see
Hi,
On 06/06/14 13:13, Michael Raskin wrote:
Maybe having a channel which is a subset of the main channel and
includes at least ssh, apache, nginx, postgresql, mysql, and some ftp
server would be a nice start?
Yeah, that sounds like a good idea.
--
Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. |
Michael Raskin 7c6f4...@mail.ru writes:
When we use priorities generously we could avoid a lot of delay even in
less critical cases.
The main problem I see is that normally you don't want to release a
channel until *all* parts have rebuilt.
+1 Rebuilding for a server that runs, say ssh,
Calculating the transitive closure for all nixos modules / services run by
systemd is one way to prioritize. A populatiry contest could be added to
that.
Maybe having a channel which is a subset of the main channel and
includes at least ssh, apache, nginx, postgresql, mysql, and some ftp
Hi,
On 06/06/14 13:29, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
How are people supposed to use that channel?
I don't think I can _add_ a secondary channel which provides a
conflicting source (nixos). Switching back and forth doesn't sound
easy.
Switching to another channel is very easy:
$ nix-channel --add
Hi,
On 06/06/14 13:14, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
That still doesn't solve the question how to do a half build.
If there have been 5 commits since the last channel build, and you add
an important security fix, there is no way to only build that fix
without building the other stuff.
Well, if it's
Michael Raskin 7c6f4...@mail.ru writes:
Calculating the transitive closure for all nixos modules / services run by
systemd is one way to prioritize. A populatiry contest could be added to
that.
Maybe having a channel which is a subset of the main channel and
includes at least ssh, apache,
Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com writes:
Hi,
On 06/06/14 13:29, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
How are people supposed to use that channel?
I don't think I can _add_ a secondary channel which provides a
conflicting source (nixos). Switching back and forth doesn't sound
easy.
Switching to
On 06/06/2014 07:59 AM, Ertugrul Söylemez wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 23:39:34 +0200
Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hydra has and uses priorities. Anyway, building OpenSSL itself is very
quick, but rebuilding all that (transitively) depends on it is worse.
And there are CVE fixes
Hi,
On 06/06/14 13:57, Mathijs Kwik wrote:
So server systems need to start following a channel that does not run
lengthy tests?
The NixOS system tests actually aren't very lengthy (though they do suffer from
non-deterministic failures). It's more the latency of having to wait for 20,000
Hi,
I packaged the PSP emulator called PPSSPP a while ago and it has been in
nixpkgs for little over a week[1]. When I try to nix-env -i PPSSPP
however my system tells me that it will build it rather than fetch it.
I thought that maybe I needed to explicitly specify platforms but the
‘vice’
On 7 June 2014 05:23, Mateusz Kowalczyk fuuze...@fuuzetsu.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I packaged the PSP emulator called PPSSPP a while ago and it has been in
nixpkgs for little over a week[1]. When I try to nix-env -i PPSSPP
however my system tells me that it will build it rather than fetch it.
I
17 matches
Mail list logo
