Re: [Nix-dev] gcc has stopped working on Mac OS X Mavericks

2014-10-23 Thread John Wiegley
> Michael Sperber writes: > Also, maybe I misunderstood you - what do you mean by "reference"? It seems > the reference is in gcc itself - the C file I'm compiling is trivial: > [nix-shell:~/]$ gcc ~/temp/x.c > ld: file not found: /usr/lib/system/libsystem_coreservices.dylib for > architec

Re: [Nix-dev] gcc has stopped working on Mac OS X Mavericks

2014-10-23 Thread Michael Sperber
Thanks for the prompt reply! "John Wiegley" writes: >> Michael Sperber writes: > >> \[\][nix-shell:~/temp]$\[\] gcc x.c >> ld: file not found: /usr/lib/system/libsystem_coreservices.dylib for >> architecture x86_64 >> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > >> I'm stumped with this.

Re: [Nix-dev] gcc has stopped working on Mac OS X Mavericks

2014-10-23 Thread John Wiegley
> Michael Sperber writes: > \[\][nix-shell:~/temp]$\[\] gcc x.c > ld: file not found: /usr/lib/system/libsystem_coreservices.dylib for > architecture x86_64 > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > I'm stumped with this. Just to be sure, I built gccApple from source, but > the proble

Re: [Nix-dev] Zero Hydra Failures (ZHF) project for NixOS

2014-10-23 Thread Domen Kožar
I'm +1 on this one. Hydra evaluates nixpkgs very fast. I'm only worried if the email is per build, not per jobset evaluation. Is that the case? PS: Ideally it would test every commit (or bisect failing commit). On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote: > Cheers! > > On 10/23/2014

Re: [Nix-dev] Zero Hydra Failures (ZHF) project for NixOS

2014-10-23 Thread Vladimír Čunát
Cheers! On 10/23/2014 06:57 PM, Domen Kožar wrote: Now it's *only* about keeping it that way ;-) Well, what about Hydra notifying committers/authors of changes that (probably) cause build breakages? IIRC it's just about enabling a switch, and in the current state it might not generate so muc

Re: [Nix-dev] Zero Hydra Failures (ZHF) project for NixOS

2014-10-23 Thread Bjørn Forsman
On 23 October 2014 18:57, Domen Kožar wrote: > We're pretty much done getting failures to zero: > http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/trunk-combined Awesome! Thanks to everyone helping out. (I feel ashamed for not doing so myself.) I remember first time I looked at Hydra, maybe 2 years ago. I wa

Re: [Nix-dev] Zero Hydra Failures (ZHF) project for NixOS

2014-10-23 Thread Thomas Strobel
Wow! Amazing!! :) Thanks for all the effort! Thomas On 10/23/2014 06:57 PM, Domen Kožar wrote: > We're pretty much done getting failures to zero: > http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/trunk-combined > > Now it's *only* about keeping it that way ;-) > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Domen Kožar

Re: [Nix-dev] Zero Hydra Failures (ZHF) project for NixOS

2014-10-23 Thread Domen Kožar
We're pretty much done getting failures to zero: http://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/trunk-combined Now it's *only* about keeping it that way ;-) On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Domen Kožar wrote: > Last two packages and a test: > > - linuxPackages_latest.netatop http://hydra.nixos.org/build/15

[Nix-dev] NixOS 14.11 "Caterpillar" release schedule

2014-10-23 Thread Domen Kožar
Hi all, I have volunteered to be release manager of Caterpillar. I'd like to fix two dates for the release: - 20.11: I'll branch off master into `release-14.11`, from that point on we'll be testing and applying bugfixes - 30.11: final release of NixOS 14.11 Documentation about release process, p

Re: [Nix-dev] About 14.11 release

2014-10-23 Thread Domen Kožar
Hi, On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Luca Bruno wrote: > I appreciate the work being done by Domen and jumping in as release > manager. > thanks! > I'd like to point out a few things however about the milestone issues. The > release should be due for October 31th, and in my vision the date i

[Nix-dev] gcc has stopped working on Mac OS X Mavericks

2014-10-23 Thread Michael Sperber
Nix used to work fine for me on Mac OS X, but today it acted up by way of gcc stopping to work: > nix-shell ~/build/nixpkgs -A cyrus_sasl \[\][nix-shell:~/temp]$\[\] gcc x.c ld: file not found: /usr/lib/system/libsystem_coreservices.dylib for architecture x86_64 collect2: error: ld returned 1 e

[Nix-dev] Upstream nix expressions

2014-10-23 Thread Michael Raskin
>If this thing would be supported, this would give us a good reason to >push our nix expressions upstream. This would have at least 2 good >impacts: > >- a growing awareness of nix >- a nice way for all developers to build their package - Ease of integration of Nix-related tools thatt already come

[Nix-dev] Upstream nix expressions

2014-10-23 Thread Damien Cassou
Hi, imagine an upstream tarball includes a nix expression to build and install the tarball. How can I reuse this nix expression when I propose the package to NixOS/nixpkgs? By "reuse", I *do not* include copy/pasting. If this thing would be supported, this would give us a good reason to push our

Re: [Nix-dev] Executing bash directly lead to errors

2014-10-23 Thread Bjørn Forsman
On 23 October 2014 15:46, Pierre Allix wrote: > Hi, > > When executing bash directly from the store, I get the following errors: > > Any ideas? > > ./nix/env/bin/bash > bash: lesspipe: command not found > bash: shopt: progcomp: invalid shell option name > bash: complete: command not found [...] W

[Nix-dev] Executing bash directly lead to errors

2014-10-23 Thread Pierre Allix
Hi, When executing bash directly from the store, I get the following errors: Any ideas? ./nix/env/bin/bash bash: lesspipe: command not found bash: shopt: progcomp: invalid shell option name bash: complete: command not found bash: complete: command not found bash: complete: command not found bash

Re: [Nix-dev] About 14.11 release

2014-10-23 Thread Vladimír Čunát
Hi! On 10/22/2014 05:42 PM, Eelco Dolstra wrote: That's November 30th (we changed it to 14.11). Maybe we should call it 14.12 and release at the start of December :-) We'll see how it goes. IMO solving the issues is more important than the scheduled date. I think we also want staging stuff i