On 10/24/2016 12:55 PM, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
> You could try the underlying S3 bucket
(https://nix-cache.s3.amazonaws.com/),
> but that should generally be avoided because it's a bit more expensive
than
> CloudFront (and of course slower).
That probably would be a fail-safe solution, though I
Hi,
On 10/24/2016 01:05 AM, Nikolay Amiantov wrote:
> Apparently, recently cache.nixos.org was blocked in Russia[1] (not it
> specifically, but rather a bunch of CloudFront hosts, because something
> illegal was using it). I don't yet experience the block myself at home
> (seems my ISP is
I went somewhat other way, because I didn't want to put a financial and
maintenance strain on Graham (but I appreciate the offer!) and I'm not
sure how to find out an S3 bucket name.
Instead, I ran this Ruby script to search for unblocked IP addresses:
> require 'resolv'
> require 'socket'
>
Does anyone know the name of the S3 bucket that contains the files? The
bucket itself might not be on the block list.
Otherwise it might be a good opportunity to try
IPFS out. It works around the IP block list and also distributes the
transport costs to all of the users.
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016,
Note this won't require trusting me because the packages will still be
signed by upstream.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 7:38 PM Graham Christensen
wrote:
> Looking in to this, I found Hetzner offers 20TB of bandwidth for servers
> which cost less than € 39.00.
>
> I'd be happy to
Looking in to this, I found Hetzner offers 20TB of bandwidth for servers
which cost less than € 39.00.
I'd be happy to provide a mirror on my personal hetzner machine, but it
wouldn't be anything official. If things got over 20TB though I'd need to
re-evaluate the offer.
I can imagine a need for
Hi all,
Apparently, recently cache.nixos.org was blocked in Russia[1] (not it
specifically, but rather a bunch of CloudFront hosts, because something
illegal was using it). I don't yet experience the block myself at home
(seems my ISP is reluctant to actually abide by the law). However, I
can't