>>> Probably we should drop the tree structure (reduce the number of
>>> categories?) and replace it by search tags + tools to query these tags.
>>
>> +1
>
>+1
>
>In addition, I'd say the actual Nix packages tree structure should be
>redesigned to
>be developer-oriented. I.e., less rather than more
Hi,
"Yury G. Kudryashov" writes:
> Probably we should drop the tree structure (reduce the number of
> categories?) and replace it by search tags + tools to query these tags.
I tend to agree, and I think it would be prudent to at least have a look
at debtags. Lot of effort went into this one, a
>> Probably we should drop the tree structure (reduce the number of
>> categories?) and replace it by search tags + tools to query these tags.
>
> +1
+1
In addition, I'd say the actual Nix packages tree structure should be
redesigned to
be developer-oriented. I.e., less rather than more categorie
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:33:12 +0400, "Yury G. Kudryashov"
wrote:
> Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:20:06AM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> >> Nothing wrong if you want to find a package and you know the name of this
> >> package. In this case we can put all pac
> Try to find qrencode library this way ;).
Takes me 3 seconds:
Open Vim, :e foo.nix :tjump qr
See ctagsWrapped it knows about nix keys.
Then you can tag the whole nixpkgs easily using
ctags -R .
> Probably we should drop the tree structure (reduce the number of
> categories?) and replace it by
Excerpts from Yury G. Kudryashov's message of Fri Jan 06 22:35:14 +0100 2012:
> I'd like to split development/libraries into subdirectories. Any objections?
For what reason? ls -l being too long is no strong reason IMHO unless we
hit > 10.000 files.
In the past there was one guy who preferred the
Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:20:06AM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>> Nothing wrong if you want to find a package and you know the name of this
>> package. In this case we can put all packages (not only libraries) into
>> one directory.
>>
>> But `ls applications
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 03:20:06AM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> Clark Gaebel wrote:
>
> > ls -h | grep 'package'
> >
> > What's wrong with that?
> Nothing wrong if you want to find a package and you know the name of this
> package. In this case we can put all packages (not only libraries)
Clark Gaebel wrote:
> ls -h | grep 'package'
>
> What's wrong with that?
Nothing wrong if you want to find a package and you know the name of this
package. In this case we can put all packages (not only libraries) into one
directory.
But `ls applications/science/math` yields the list of (most?
ls -h | grep 'package'
What's wrong with that?
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Yury G. Kudryashov
wrote:
> Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 01:35:14AM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'd like to split development/libraries into subdirectories. Any
>>>
Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 01:35:14AM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'd like to split development/libraries into subdirectories. Any
>> objections?
>>
>> Some possible subdirectories:
>> * multimedia (audio, video)
>> * network
>> * security
>> * gra
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 01:35:14AM +0400, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to split development/libraries into subdirectories. Any objections?
>
> Some possible subdirectories:
> * multimedia (audio, video)
> * network
> * security
> * graphics
> * GUI
> * filesystem
Too large for w
Hi!
I'd like to split development/libraries into subdirectories. Any objections?
Some possible subdirectories:
* multimedia (audio, video)
* network
* security
* graphics
* GUI
* filesystem
--
Yury G. Kudryashov,
mailto: ur...@mccme.ru
___
nix-dev mai
13 matches
Mail list logo
