Hi,
Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net skribis:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:07:44 +0100, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote:
(..)
There’s a Debbugs mode in Emacs that really rocks, because it’s
specifically tailored for the job, has a convenient UI, and is well
integrated
#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign
Hi Ludo’
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:07:44 +0100, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote:
(..)
There’s a Debbugs mode in Emacs that really rocks, because it’s
specifically tailored for the job, has a convenient UI, and is well
integrated with
#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:55:44 -0700, Corey O'Connor coreyocon...@gmail.com
wrote:
Now, a web tool is likely to be too tedious for me to use, and I expect
other hackers may not like having to jump to a browser to get the work
done. :-)
xmonad + vimium is
Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov urkud.ur...@gmail.com skribis:
http://reviewboard.org
FWIW, a “web-based code review tool” is never going to be powerful for
me: using a web server puts me on the slow path.
I would recommend keeping using email for that. In addition, Debbugs
could be used to keep
2012/3/18 Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org:
Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov urkud.ur...@gmail.com skribis:
http://reviewboard.org
FWIW, a “web-based code review tool” is never going to be powerful for
me: using a web server puts me on the slow path.
I would recommend keeping using email for that.
Hi,
On 18/03/12 18:01, Corey O'Connor wrote:
IMO, use of git avoids some problems just by being distributed. The
patches can be recorded to many repositories even if the submitting
user does not have access to the master repository.
And GitHub has pull requests and allows commenting on
Hi,
Corey O'Connor coreyocon...@gmail.com skribis:
Patches submitted by email to the list get lost.
Yes, I understand the problem, and I agree it’s important to fix it.
Now, a web tool is likely to be too tedious for me to use, and I expect
other hackers may not like having to jump to a
2012/3/18 Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org:
Yes, I understand the problem, and I agree it’s important to fix it.
Excellent! So long everybody agrees there is a problem then it is only
a matter of time before we find a solution. ;-)
Now, a web tool is likely to be too tedious for me to use, and I
Hi!
Corey O'Connor coreyocon...@gmail.com skribis:
2012/3/18 Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org:
[...]
Now, a web tool is likely to be too tedious for me to use, and I expect
other hackers may not like having to jump to a browser to get the work
done. :-)
xmonad + vimium is my recommendation
Hi!
If you look at a review, and find nothing bad, press Ship it, please. This
is the only way I know about to distinguish nobody cares scenario from
some people had a look, and found nothing bad.
--
Yury G. Kudryashov,
mailto: ur...@mccme.ru
___
Marc Weber wrote:
This would
- shut up all people (like me :) asking for git all the time
- stop people announcing yet another git mirror of nixos/nixpkgs
- allow code sharing on github
This won't shut up me disliking non-opensource github hosting. What features
do you miss in, e.g.,
In reviewboard I can send a review request to a particular person, not to
repository. Is it possible in github?
Probably no. It looks like comments are sent to all members as email.
But I'm not an expert.
github has the network tab view which gitorious doesn't have, does
it ?
github just came
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Shea Levy s...@shealevy.com wrote:
On 3/17/12 10:37 PM, Corey O'Connor wrote:
Thanks for the info!
What happens when we hit Ship It?
It adds a review that basically means I don't mind if you commit this. In
a 'no-reply-is-no-ok' project like NixOS this kind
Corey O'Connor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Shea Levy s...@shealevy.com wrote:
On 3/17/12 10:37 PM, Corey O'Connor wrote:
Thanks for the info!
What happens when we hit Ship It?
It adds a review that basically means I don't mind if you commit this.
In a 'no-reply-is-no-ok'
Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov urkud.ur...@gmail.com skribis:
I've set up a reviewboard at http://reviewboard.loegria.net/
What is it, and what would it be used for?
Ludo’.
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
Yury G. Kudryashov urkud.ur...@gmail.com skribis:
I've set up a reviewboard at http://reviewboard.loegria.net/
What is it,
http://reviewboard.org
and what would it be used for?
Not loosing incoming patches while we're using svn for nixos and nixpkgs.
--
Cillian de Róiste wrote:
Hi,
It looks very useful. I just thought I'd mention that I was confused
by the form question:
Base Directory: The absolute path in the repository the diff was
generated in.
It is happy with /nixpkgs/trunk for relative patches created in
/etc/nixos/nixpkgs
I
Corey O'Connor wrote:
Thanks!
Is reviewboard set up to email the list when a patch is posted for
review? I think that would be great.
No, I made no setup yet. Only registered nix svn repo. Actually, I'm not
sure if mailing works at all. It tries to use localhost:25, and I have no
idea if it
Corey O'Connor wrote:
Thanks!
Is reviewboard set up to email the list when a patch is posted for
review?
This will work if someone will add nore...@reviewboard.loegria.net to
whitelist. Eelco?
I think that would be great.
--
Yury G. Kudryashov,
mailto: ur...@mccme.ru
19 matches
Mail list logo
