On 03/23/2017 12:58 AM, Bas van Dijk wrote:
> Strange this has been merged into master over a year ago but it hasn't
> been released yet. And there have been quite a few releases the last year...
There have only been maintenance releases 1.11.x since January 2016, and
most of master code since the
Thanks for the pointer! It looks like that's exactly what I need. Strange
this has been merged into master over a year ago but it hasn't been
released yet. And there have been quite a few releases the last year...
On 21 March 2017 at 09:06, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> On 03/21/2017 01:35 AM, Bas van
On 03/21/2017 01:35 AM, Bas van Dijk wrote:
> I would like a RFC on floating-point support in Nix. Unfortunately I
> don't have time to work on that myself.
For the record, Nix does support floats, though not in any release yet.
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/762
(You might've meant some more s
Good to see this happen!
I would like a RFC on floating-point support in Nix. Unfortunately I don't
have time to work on that myself.
Bas
On 18 March 2017 at 23:09, zimbatm wrote:
> RFC 0001 has been merged! The repo still needs to be moved to the NixOS
> org but we're getting there :)
>
> To
RFC 0001 has been merged! The repo still needs to be moved to the NixOS org
but we're getting there :)
To keep the ball rolling, let me know if you want to try drafting a RFC.
The whole process is probably still a bit rough and we need to get a couple
of RFCs trough the process to make it better.
I haven't read the latest changes in the RFC, but I welcome any more formal
process for major changes.
Thank you @zimbatm for pursuing this.
> On 09 March 2017 at 13:09 Tomasz Czyż wrote:
>
>
> Thanks! Great stuff!
>
> 2017-03-08 21:21 GMT+00:00 zimbatm :
>
> > The RFC for RFCs is ready f
Thanks! Great stuff!
2017-03-08 21:21 GMT+00:00 zimbatm :
> The RFC for RFCs is ready for a final round of review. Unless there are
> major objections I would like to move forward with it, with the idea that
> we can always improve the process with further RFCs.
>
> https://github.com/zimbatm/rfc
The RFC for RFCs is ready for a final round of review. Unless there are
major objections I would like to move forward with it, with the idea that
we can always improve the process with further RFCs.
https://github.com/zimbatm/rfcs/pull/1
On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 20:17 Maarten Hoogendoorn wrote:
>
Also see the notes that Arian took during the BoF session at FOSDEM:
We had a very spontaneous NixOS discussion panel at FOSDEM.
>
> I took minutes. I must say they're a bit rushy at times, so add stuff to
> it
> you think isn't clear or is lacking in content. Thanks!
>
>
> http://piratepad.net/
That would be amazing! I actually have an email sitting in my draft folder
proposing Nix Enhancement Proposals (NEPs).
IMHO one of the things we aren't very good at is getting larger changes
merged or rejected. We attract a lot of smart people because Nix is pretty
awesome. These smart people then
Hi all,
we discussed of introducing a RFC process during FOSDEM. The goal is to
help discussion for large or controversial changes which typically grind to
a halt.
Here is an initial proposal based on the one from the Rust community:
https://github.com/zimbatm/rfcs/pull/1 . Please let me know wha
11 matches
Mail list logo