- Original Message -
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:49 PM, David R. Wilson da...@wwns.com
wrote:
I am curious if anyone knows of any legitimate claim DHS has to
being able to take down web sites by DNS modification?
I don't know about you guys, but this is getting a bit old to me:
Any opinions on an Internet kill switch?
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/security/what-the-experts-think-about-the-viability-of-an-internet-kill-switch/5034?tag=nl.e036
text of Section 1016 of H.R.3162 (USA Patriot Act)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c107:1:./temp/~c107jJ2pkO:e415432:
definitely.. Which brings the earlier discussion of we need to have a
backbone infrastructure telecommunications the government can't
regulate
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Russ Crawford
russ.m.crawf...@gmail.com wrote:
Any opinions on an Internet kill switch?
I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I don't want our
government to be able to pull this business that Egypt pulled to quell
rebellion by shutting off the Internet in the entire country (which is
stupid and didn't work, anyway.)
On the other hand, what if we had some kind of
- Original Message -
I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I don't want our
government to be able to pull this business that Egypt pulled to quell
rebellion by shutting off the Internet in the entire country (which is
stupid and didn't work, anyway.)
On the other hand,
On Feb 8, 2011, at 1:18 PM, Steven S. Critchfield cri...@basesys.com wrote:
- Original Message -
Then again, how about we make sure we don't become the nanny state and
eliminate personal responsibility for ones actions or inactions.
--
Steven Critchfield cri...@basesys.com
Well
This is the Internet we're talking about, not smart people ;)
There are a lot of systems connected to the Internet (like power grid
systems and nuclear power plants) that certainly SHOULDN'T be connected to
the Internet but they are...
Chris
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Steven S.
- Original Message -
This is the Internet we're talking about, not smart people ;)
There are a lot of systems connected to the Internet (like power grid
systems and nuclear power plants) that certainly SHOULDN'T be
connected to
the Internet but they are...
So, if they are connected
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Chris McQuistion cmcquist...@watkins.eduwrote:
This is the Internet we're talking about, not smart people ;)
Sadly, this is true, and what is scary is the following...
Consider everyone you know well and interact with on a daily basis.
Now consider that these
I thought it was amusing yesterday when I tried to send one of my
Congressmen a note about this legislation and how wrong it really is.
The web site said my email address was invalid.
I guess I am not surprised.
Dave
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:51 -0600, Russ Crawford wrote:
Any opinions on an
While I agree with your assessment, you have to consider that a serious
cyber attack could (and probably would) include multiple vectors and have
multiple delivery mechanisms. We can't just blame the guy with a 10 year
old Windows XP machine with no firewall.
One thing Stuxnet taught us is that
Your opinion is contrary. Your argument is invalid.
Chris :)
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:46 PM, David R. Wilson da...@wwns.com wrote:
I thought it was amusing yesterday when I tried to send one of my
Congressmen a note about this legislation and how wrong it really is.
The web site said my
Sounds like a good reason to switch support to another politician.
Andy
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:46 PM, David R. Wilson da...@wwns.com wrote:
I thought it was amusing yesterday when I tried to send one of my
Congressmen a note about this legislation and how wrong it really is.
The web site
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 13:18:41 Steven S. Critchfield wrote:
- Original Message -
This is the Internet we're talking about, not smart people ;)
There are a lot of systems connected to the Internet (like power grid
systems and nuclear power plants) that certainly SHOULDN'T
Yes,
True, but unfortunately that was one of the friendlies.
I suspect someone in IT (running one of those closed OSs) had something
to do with that.
Dave
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:57 -0500, Andrew Farnsworth wrote:
Sounds like a good reason to switch support to another politician.
Andy
Very good points Tilghman.
If there is one thing we can (probably) all agree on, it is that making more
laws doesn't necessarily make things better!
Chris
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Tilghman Lesher tilgh...@meg.abyt.eswrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 13:18:41 Steven S. Critchfield
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Will Drewry w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Chris McQuistion
cmcquist...@watkins.edu wrote:
While I agree with your assessment, you have to consider that a serious
cyber attack could (and probably would) include multiple vectors and have
On Feb 8, 4:40 pm, Paul Boniol paul.bon...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Will Drewry w...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Chris McQuistion
cmcquist...@watkins.edu wrote:
While I agree with your assessment, you have to consider that a serious
cyber
I checked my e-mail and printouts.
I requested MRB-III 1220 from 18:00 to 19:55, through the online form
(January 2011 through July 2011).
The confirmation came back that we had the room from 18:00 to 20:55 on
our meeting days.
I did not find any other e-mail concerning our room reservation,
Thanks for checking on this, Paul.
Chris
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Paul Boniol paul.bon...@gmail.com wrote:
I checked my e-mail and printouts.
I requested MRB-III 1220 from 18:00 to 19:55, through the online form
(January 2011 through July 2011).
The confirmation came back that we
20 matches
Mail list logo
