Re: [nlug] Re: After the Meeting Tonight

2010-12-18 Thread Bill Woody
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Raymond raymond.a.beaud...@gmail.comwrote: I am so greatly ashamed none of you have mentioned nano. On Dec 15, 8:36 pm, Andrew Farnsworth farn...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Greg Donald gdon...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Dec 15, 2010

Re: [nlug] Re: After the Meeting Tonight

2010-12-18 Thread Andrew Farnsworth
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Bill Woody woody39...@gmail.com wrote: OK. If I understand correctly, I am not allowed to apply politics, religion or text editors to my views lest someone prove their ability to cuss? You forgot the fact that you are not allowed to complain or draw attention

Re: [nlug] Re: After the Meeting Tonight

2010-12-18 Thread Bill Woody
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Andrew Farnsworth farn...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Bill Woody woody39...@gmail.com wrote: OK. If I understand correctly, I am not allowed to apply politics, religion or text editors to my views lest someone prove their ability to cuss?

Re: [nlug] Re: After the Meeting Tonight

2010-12-18 Thread Chris McQuistion
The first rule of NLUG is, you don't talk about NLUG! (Wait. That's not quite right) Chris On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Bill Woody woody39...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Andrew Farnsworth farn...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Bill Woody

Re: [nlug] Re: After the Meeting Tonight

2010-12-18 Thread David R. Wilson
Gee It is amazing how much noise can be generated by one puny email. Dave On Sat, 2010-12-18 at 10:43 -0500, Bill Woody wrote: On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Andrew Farnsworth farn...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:11 AM, Bill Woody