On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 06:19 PM, Wayne Fay wrote:
AWStats is great, unless you're monitoring gigs of logs (per
day).
Another +1 for awstats if it serves your purposes.
Wayne
Seems someone up the company chain of
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Tilghman Lesher tilgh...@meg.abyt.es wrote:
I'd suggest that you look into Piwik, actually. It won't help you
with past data,
+1
Tilghman wins this thread.
I couldn't remember the name of this package, but yeah. It's awesome.
It actually will help with
This might be a little heretical, but have you considered using Google
Analytics, which involves pasting javascript into your web pages, as
opposed to monitoring Apache, itself?
Not the right solution for everyone, but pretty darn good for some things.
Chris
Chris
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:05
On 02/07/2013 11:06 AM, Chris McQuistion wrote:
This might be a little heretical, but have you considered using Google
Analytics, which involves pasting javascript into your web pages, as
opposed to monitoring Apache, itself?
Not the right solution for everyone, but pretty darn good for some
GA does provide a bunch of useful information. What it does not
provide, is analysis of your error log. I find that looking through the
errorlog is useful for fixing holes in the web application, seeing
kiddies sweeping for holes, and if you've got ads, the error log is
useful for seeing how
Is Webalizer insufficient? http://www.webalizer.org/ Seems to give me all the
stats I ever needed about our web site at work. or is that too mundane and
turnkey appliance operator for you?
Bruce
--
Bruce W. Martin, KQ4TV
Trustee for NT4UX
On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Sabuj Pattanayek wrote:
On 02/07/2013 02:21 PM, Bruce W. Martin wrote:
Is Webalizer insufficient? http://www.webalizer.org/ Seems to give me
all the stats I ever needed about our web site at work. or is that too
mundane and turnkey appliance operator for you?
Bruce
Webalizer is on the short list of things to look
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:57 AM, andrew mcelroy sophri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Tilghman Lesher tilgh...@meg.abyt.es wrote:
I'd suggest that you look into Piwik, actually. It won't help you
with past data,
+1
Tilghman wins this thread.
I couldn't remember the
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Chris McQuistion
cmcquist...@watkins.edu wrote:
This might be a little heretical, but have you considered using Google
Analytics, which involves pasting javascript into your web pages, as opposed
to monitoring Apache, itself?
Not the right solution for
Webalizer is basically the same as AWstat.
Those are great at handling the log analysis.
Someone mentioned Google Analytics, this is good at knowing something abut the
speed of getting all the content out to the client machine.
Current employer is also using a tool call New relic to track a
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Bruce W. Martin marti...@gmail.com wrote:
Is Webalizer insufficient? http://www.webalizer.org/ Seems to give me all
the stats I ever needed about our web site at work. or is that too mundane
and turnkey appliance operator for you?
Webalizer is sufficient if
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Steven S. Critchfield
cri...@basesys.com wrote:
Someone mentioned Google Analytics, this is good at knowing something abut
the speed of getting all the content out to the client machine.
GA isn't much help without some context for executing script tag
contents,
I've been tasked to suggest web site statistical gathering and reporting
for apache web servers on linux systems. My 15 minute analysis has told
me that there are many mirrors amongst much smoke in this area of
endeavor. Does anyone have a link to a basic primer on the subject? I
have a
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
I've been tasked to suggest web site statistical gathering and reporting for
apache web servers on linux systems. My 15 minute analysis has told me that
there are many mirrors amongst much smoke in this area of endeavor. Does
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:18 PM, andrew mcelroy sophri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
I've been tasked to suggest web site statistical gathering and reporting for
apache web servers on linux systems. My 15 minute analysis has told me that
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:18 PM, andrew mcelroy sophri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
I've been tasked to suggest web site statistical gathering and reporting for
apache web servers on linux systems. My 15 minute analysis has told me that
we use awstats, it's pretty basic but tells us what we want
andrew mcelroy sophri...@gmail.com wrote:On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:18 PM,
andrew mcelroy sophri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
I've been tasked to suggest web site statistical
AWStats is great, unless you're monitoring gigs of logs (per day). At
the web-facing places that I work in, the logs generated are too large
for awstats to process in a whole working day, even on a huge box. It is
also not multithreaded, and can require an insane amount of memory. For
smaller
Howard,
The first step is to figure out exactly what you want to track and why.
Then how often you need to run the stats? Realtime to monthly. Once you
start to understand your requirements you can start to look at packages.
You also might read about marketing analysis of your traffic and
On 02/06/2013 06:19 PM, Wayne Fay wrote:
AWStats is great, unless you're monitoring gigs of logs (per day).
Another +1 for awstats if it serves your purposes.
Wayne
Seems someone up the company chain of command has heard of AWStats so
that is what I get to learn about. Thanks
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
On 02/06/2013 06:19 PM, Wayne Fay wrote:
AWStats is great, unless you're monitoring gigs of logs (per
day).
Another +1 for awstats if it serves your purposes.
Wayne
Seems someone up the company chain of
21 matches
Mail list logo
