inc/pop don't ask me for password ??

2002-07-25 Thread Denis Buffenoir
Hi I just install the new NMH version configure --enable-nmh-pop --prefix=/usr/local/nmh-1.0.4 uname -a Linux www-rocq1.inria.fr 2.4.5 #2 Fri Sep 21 18:55:59 CEST 2001 i686 unknown why the 1.0.4 don't ask me "Password...:" when I do : [buffenoi@www-rocq1 bin]$ ./inc -host pop-rocq -notruncate

nmh and tcl

2002-07-25 Thread Chris Garrigues
I had some thoughts about bringing nmh into the 21st century which is quite likely to provoke some discussion: An IMAP back end will require a *lot* more state to be maintained between nmh commands in order to get any reasonable performance. MH was written as a collection of related commands

nmh-agent? (was nmh and tcl)

2002-07-25 Thread Chad C. Walstrom
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 11:12:02AM -0500, Chris Garrigues wrote: More recently, the strategy that applications have used to implement (b) is to embed a language such as tcl instead. This statement doesn't quite match your examples below. The use of an embedded language is to add access in

Re: nmh-agent? (was nmh and tcl)

2002-07-25 Thread Ken Hornstein
There is one other problem with getting nmh to work over IMAP. The IMAP daemon's themselves must understand the MH format. I believe UW has mh support as a legacy, but I haven't spent enough time to get my own use of it working. Any feedback on IMAP daemons that work with the MH format. ...

A tribute to nmh

2002-07-25 Thread Chad C. Walstrom
I have a recent experience with nmh that prompts me to sing its praises once more. I've had my workstation offline for a few weeks now, and didn't really give it much thought as to how much email I would accumulate in that time. My normal process for retrieving and filtering email involves

Re: nmh and tcl

2002-07-25 Thread Neil W Rickert
Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More recently, the strategy that applications have used to implement (b) is to embed a language such as tcl instead. The day that happens to MH/nmh will be the day that I switch to using mutt. -NWR

Re: nmh and tcl

2002-07-25 Thread Ken Hornstein
Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More recently, the strategy that applications have used to implement (b) is to embed a language such as tcl instead. The day that happens to MH/nmh will be the day that I switch to using mutt. Since the intersection of people with cool ideas and people

Re: nmh and tcl

2002-07-25 Thread Neil W Rickert
Ken Hornstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More recently, the strategy that applications have used to implement (b) is to embed a language such as tcl instead. The day that happens to MH/nmh will be the day that I switch to using mutt. Since the

Re: nmh and tcl

2002-07-25 Thread norm
If such a disaster were to ever happen, the new system should not be called mh or nmh -- it is too violative of the spirit of mh. I hope that, in parallel, nmh would continue to grow. Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --==_Exmh_35284420P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I had

Re: nmh and tcl

2002-07-25 Thread norm
Ken Hornstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It is the accessibility of command line tools that makes nmh so powerful. It is already in the 21st century, although a little buggy in spots. Oh, I agree ... but I don't think NEW features that don't remove or diminish the command-line tools functions

Re: nmh and tcl

2002-07-25 Thread Neil W Rickert
Ken Hornstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is the accessibility of command line tools that makes nmh so powerful. It is already in the 21st century, although a little buggy in spots. Oh, I agree ... but I don't think NEW features that don't remove or diminish the command-line tools functions

repl's use of umask causing problems

2002-07-25 Thread Kris Klindworth
The behavior I am seeing is undesirable, but it appears to be exhibited in the old MH stuff so I don't know if you would call it a bug. m_gmprot() appears to return the file access mode to use for protecting new files. The value is user configurable and the default value 600. 600 is a good

Re: nmh and tcl

2002-07-25 Thread Chris Garrigues
From: Neil W Rickert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 13:23:45 -0500 Ken Hornstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is the accessibility of command line tools that makes nmh so powerful. It is already in the 21st century, although a little buggy in spots. Oh, I agree ... but I

Re: nmh-agent? (was nmh and tcl)

2002-07-25 Thread Sean Kamath
[In a message on Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:28:08 CDT, the pithy ruminations of Chad C. Walstrom were:] This statement doesn't quite match your examples below. The use of an embedded language is to add access in that language to otherwise C functions. The maintenance of state between separate

Re: nmh-agent? (was nmh and tcl)

2002-07-25 Thread chewie
I had meant for this reply to go to the list, but wasn't paying attention. ;-) The problem is, I want *some* folders to be on my imap server. I want some local. And I want to download some mail from some imap servers, some pop servers (actually, SSL pop/imap servers), and some local spool