> Can you provide an example listing of nmh commands that show the problem
> so it can be verified as fixed after the patch is applied.
Assuming that you have a mail message in ``+inbox 1'' and your
.mh_profile contains ``Unseen-Sequence: unseen''.
folder +test
rmm all
On the topic of version number designation, I personally like the way
the Linux kernel is versioned. If you're not familiar with it, here's
the quick and dirty. MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH. MAJOR changes when
evolutionary changes have occurred. MINOR level has a special meaning.
Odd numbered MINOR level
> "Ken" == Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ken> It doesn't seem like nmh development has really progressed lately; I am
Ken> having a hard time finding commits later than March 17th of this year.
Ken> I'm wondering if Dan & the gang are still doing work on nmh; if not,
Can you provide an example listing of nmh commands that show the problem
so it can be verified as fixed after the patch is applied.
Shantonu
On Saturday, December 8, 2001, at 12:06 PM, Jeffrey C Honig wrote:
> The symptom is that the first ``inc'' into an empty folder will not
> update the uns
I agree with the ``save 2.0 for the next round of new features''
sentiment. I suggest putting out a release with as many of the bugfixes
as we can get in, then start working on a 2.0 beta with major new
features/interface changes/what-have-you.
chad
The symptom is that the first ``inc'' into an empty folder will not
update the unseen sequence. This is because seq_list() will return NULL
if mp->nummsg is zero.
My proposed fix follows.
Thanks.
Jeff
Index: uip/inc.c
===
RCS fil
The following patch appears to fix the problem with gdbm. If someone
could sanity check and apply...
/Anders
[ander@devil nmh]$ cvs diff configure.in uip/slocal.c
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /cvs/nmh/configure.in,v
retrievi
Hi,
In the quest to iron out the last iffies in the CVS I checked out the
lastest and tried to make it. The make fails at slocal.c
slocal.c:51:18: ndbm.h: No such file or directory
I remember fighting with this like a year ago, and it was something
about ./configure checking for the dbm stuf
