On July 1, 2003 at 00:17, Bill Wohler wrote:
I think a Fcc out of the box is entirely appropriate for new users. The
Dcc usage that Earl suggests is a little more advanced, and is typically
used with procmail which is even more advanced (although it is
absolutely necessary these days). And
On July 1, 2003 at 07:47, Jerry Peek wrote:
A lot of us use the dcc: header field. It acts like bcc: does on
most other MUAs. Is there any reason not to add a paragraph about it to
the send(1) manpage?
My Linux box is down right now, so I can't check this out, but here's a
new
On June 27, 2003 at 14:36, Glenn Burkhardt wrote:
Apparently the powers that be don't want informational messages to be part
of the 'In-Reply-To: fields anymore (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html).
The obsolete fields could look like:
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 27 Jun 2003
On November 23, 2002 at 14:13, Jerry Peek wrote:
About rmf warning you before removing a folder that isn't empty: you
could write a little front-end script named rmf (put it in your personal
bin, etc.). Have it run folder on the named folder (or, if there's no
argument, on the current
On November 18, 2002 at 20:43, Jon Steinhart wrote:
Oh, some details.
1. A second getenv() call would not break the code. The copy was really
unnecessary.
As pointed out earlier, making the copy may be needed depending on the
implementation of getenv() for a given platform. And for all
On August 29, 2002 at 11:14, Tobias Polzin wrote:
I don't like BASE64/Quoted-Printable Encoded Mails, because they
are difficult to Quote and Search with exmh/glimple.
If I use /usr/lib/python/mimefy.py -b -d | /usr/mh/lib/slocal
some 8bit Parts of Mails got garbled by slocal. It seems to
On August 31, 2002 at 07:25, Anders Eriksson wrote:
I tried to get a mail environment (fetchmail, postfix, nmh, exmh)
setup under cygwin, but that failed quite hard. Any ideas wether nmh
is supposed to work cygwin?
I have a hacked build of nmh for cugwin at
On August 16, 2002 at 10:48, Sean Kamath wrote:
Lately, people here at work have really turned on the flowed text
rather than wrap it. In a way, this makes some sense -- let the mail
reader wrap the text (and exmh does a fine job of it).
But this makes for a problem on quoting replies. If
On July 30, 2002 at 04:31, Jerry Peek wrote:
This is why I chose Mozilla's mail agent: it can take a whole multipart
message and show all of it at once. (Mozilla is also more forgiving of
some poorly-encoded messages that nmh complains about and quits.) I
don't *always* need to see
On July 27, 2002 at 11:16, Neil W Rickert wrote:
But, these days, I get so much MIME mail with
attachments... and nmh's MIME handling is so far from what I
need... that I've been using the Mozilla mail agent to make the
first cut at reading my mail, weeding out spam, etc... then
On July 12, 2002 at 10:18, Neil W Rickert wrote:
That should not be possible. I haven't looked at the code. But it
should be opening the file with O_CREAT, which should fail if the
message already exists.
I think you mean O_CREAT|O_EXCL.
Unless there are major code deficiencies,
On July 4, 2002 at 09:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= Allow folder specific component files to be located in a centralized
= location. For example, if I wanted a custom scan.monthly format
= file for my inbox, I would create a file with a pathname of
= `mhpath`/scan.monthly.inbox. It does
On July 8, 2002 at 18:13, Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
That's more of a protocol issue. It's not easy to do that within the
context of POP. It _is_ possible just to get the headers within POP
and I suppose inc could be changed to just retrieve the headers and
make some sort of
On July 8, 2002 at 13:31, Ken Hornstein wrote:
I believe the Spam filters that use POP3 simply download the whole message
then make a decision, so that's not what you want.
I believe I saw a project (Mailfilter?) listed on freshmeat that
would work just with the headers. There are quite a
On July 8, 2002 at 11:21, Ken Hornstein wrote:
But seriously ... that's a good question. I haven't had time to come up
with a set of release notes. The one new feature I know about (because
I worked on it) is SASL support for POP and SMTP, so inc and comp can
use SASL to authenticate to
On June 27, 2002 at 01:03, Dan Harkless wrote:
Earl Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your problem could have been avoid if .PHONY was defined within
the makefile.
Apparently no one ever used nmh on a case-insensitive OS before, or if they
did, they didn't report that make install failed
On June 27, 2002 at 21:54, Tobias Nijweide wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
* I have a folder where I always want to use a different '-form'
option for scan.
Don't have a solution for this. You could code a variant of the patches
I mention below, with (recursive) searching of format
-specific settings) and thought that it could
have enough general appeal to be a reasonable addition to nmh.
The argument list parsing is straight-forward to do. Since I am
more comfortable doing this kind of thing in Perl, here is a stab at
it:
#!/usr/bin/perl
# Author: Earl Hood, [EMAIL
On June 21, 2002 at 11:58, Jon Stewart wrote:
I'm a Unix moron (hence the use of MacOS X), and I can't seem to get
nmh-1.0.4 to install on my system. Make claims that the install target is
up to date. (Also, config couldn't guess the host, so I specified
powerpc-apple-machten5.5, which --
On June 22, 2002 at 12:22, Jon Stewart wrote:
The problem is that Apple's HFS+ file system, which is the default and
best-supported fs at the moment, is case preserving yet case insensitive.
Thus, the INSTALL doc looks just the same to make as install. Renaming
it to README.INSTALL lets
On May 10, 2002 at 12:47, Ken Hornstein wrote:
If we are really going to move the CVS
repository this should be helpful:
URL:http://hackers.progeny.com/~dsp/nmh-cvs.tar.gz
I found that on ftp.mhost.com today when I went poking around.
I've already got it (thanks to Doug Morris
On May 10, 2002 at 16:04, Ken Hornstein wrote:
ell, _since_ you asked ... I've already submitted it for a project n
savannah.gnu.org. By that, I mean that I've created a developer's
account for myself and gone through the registration process to host a
new project. The project managers
On May 10, 2002 at 09:44, John Summerfield wrote:
Those who prefer Savanna?
+1 for Savannah.
--ewh
Well, after some hacking, I got nmh 1.0.4 to compile under cygwin. Here
are the problem highlights:
sbr/discard.c:
fpurge() does not exist under cygwin and the _FSTDIO appears
to get set by the compiler. I added a #ifdef __CYGWIN__
check to deal with this. I examined the
On April 5, 2000 at 21:51, "Dan Harkless" wrote:
If not the GPL, what other open source license would be most appropriate? X
License? Apache License? BSD License? Artistic License? Others...?
If not the GPL, I think the Artistic License,
25 matches
Mail list logo
