Hi all,
Two things:
1) Some people have commented on the comp.mail.mh newsgroup that Bcc and
Dcc headers should not be removed before Fcc is processed, so that the
Fcc copy contains them. Since the default components has
Fcc: +outbox
in it I'm inclined to agree. Does anyone disagree?
Hi Paul,
joel wrote:
1) Some people have commented on the comp.mail.mh newsgroup that Bcc
and Dcc headers should not be removed before Fcc is processed, so
that the Fcc copy contains them. Since the default components has
Fcc: +outbox in it I'm inclined to agree. Does anyone disagree?
Besides, I've always found fcc useless. It doesn't expand local user
names, e.g. `to: ralph' stays like that instead of becoming `to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]', and there's no message-id which is vital for
Erm, it's not at all useless, you're misusing it. Fcc is for filing a
local copy, it expects a
Hi Jerrad,
Besides, I've always found fcc useless. It doesn't expand local
user names, e.g. `to: ralph' stays like that instead of becoming
`to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]', and there's no message-id which is
vital for
Erm, it's not at all useless, you're misusing it. Fcc is for filing a
Hi Jerrad,
Perhaps I wasn't clear. If I have
Indeed.
Actually, I was just being polite. My second message merely repeated
the information that was in the first.
The former isn't very helpful if I ever wish to dist or forw the
email on. No message-id is a killer.
Meh, it saves a
Ralph Corderoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mar 30, 2007:
Agreed.
Besides, I've always found fcc useless. It doesn't expand local user
names, e.g. `to: ralph' stays like that instead of becoming `to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]', and there's no message-id which is vital for
referring someone back to an
I didn't read the comp.mail.mh article, so maybe I'm repeating what was
said there. But whenever I use dcc:, I always end up saving those lines
to a temporary file (or copying them with my mouse), then editing my
copy to add that field to it -- so I can find out, later, who I sent the
message
