Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh

> On Mar 16, 2016, at 4:56 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote: > > But here's the thing I really want to get at. People bring up FUSE > as a viable interface for nmh to use for IMAP. The point I'm trying > to make is: as far as I can tell, a FUSE interface to IMAP does _not_ > solve the

[Nmh-workers] mhfixmsg defies the principle of last surprise?

So trying to debug why a message got eaten by procmail. Fortunately, I've been keeping copies because I didn't trust my use of mhfixmsg yet. grep fix ~/.,mh_profilecomes up empty, no hits. $LANG=en_US.UTF-8 Running a git pull from March 9, HEAD was: commit