> On Mar 16, 2016, at 4:56 PM, Ken Hornstein <k...@pobox.com> wrote: > > But here's the thing I really want to get at. People bring up FUSE > as a viable interface for nmh to use for IMAP. The point I'm trying > to make is: as far as I can tell, a FUSE interface to IMAP does _not_ > solve the above problem; you still have to deal with it. And I believe > it makes it WORSE; each nmh command starts with a brand-new scan of a > folder, so messages added or removed between commands work out fine.
But this makes it *your* turn to come up with an insane idea. Waiting ... _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
