[Nmh-workers] par Fedora package

2015-01-18 Thread David Levine
I got tired of fighting the bugs in par introduced by the i18n patches, so I removed them from the Fedora package. Updates are now available for F20 and F21. They use just the vintage source code plus the one patch to fix handling of non-breakable space. David ___

[Nmh-workers] par Fedora package

2013-01-16 Thread David Levine
Hi, Fedora 18 was released yesterday. par is available for it: $ sudo yum install par And it should remain available for succeeding Fedora releases. David ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinf

[Nmh-workers] par Fedora package (development only)

2012-07-15 Thread David Levine
Hi, par is finally available as a Fedora package. It is currently only available for development (rawhide), NOT as an update for Fedora 17 or earlier. Though it does work with Fedora 16 and 17, and possibly earlier versions. It will be available with Fedora 18. There are just four files in the

Re: [Nmh-workers] par vs vim gqap

2012-01-27 Thread Ken Hornstein
>i expect that 'vim' cannot run as a filter the way 'par' or 'fmt' can, so the >relevance of its feature level to MH's problem set is eluding me. No disagreement here; I suspect Steve was really saying, "Hey, do we even need to call an external format program?". My answer would be "yes", because

Re: [Nmh-workers] par vs vim gqap

2012-01-27 Thread Paul Vixie
On 1/27/2012 2:37 PM, Ken Hornstein wrote: >> Does par do anything "better" than doing "gqap" in Vim? I'm recollection, >> albeit from a few years ago, is that par inferior. > Hm, I just tried it on the paragraph above, and it seems to do > alright. Not sure how to easily judge whether or not it'

Re: [Nmh-workers] par vs vim gqap

2012-01-27 Thread Ken Hornstein
>Does par do anything "better" than doing "gqap" in Vim? I'm recollection, >albeit from a few years ago, is that par inferior. Hm, I just tried it on the paragraph above, and it seems to do alright. Not sure how to easily judge whether or not it's "better" than par, though. Of course, the line

[Nmh-workers] par vs vim gqap

2012-01-27 Thread rader
Does par do anything "better" than doing "gqap" in Vim? I'm recollection, albeit from a few years ago, is that par inferior. steve -- ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

[Nmh-workers] par

2012-01-26 Thread David Levine
Joel wrote: > I'd be happy to have par as part of nmh, especially since there's no > Fedora package for par right now. (Or, alternatively, I'd be happy for > someone to package par for Fedora.) The par build hints contain a link to a spec file by Volker Kuhlmann. It works very nicely on Fedora.