Re: [Nmh-workers] Nmh status - working on nmh

2004-09-16 Thread Harald Geyer
let's pass the torch to someone else. It would really be nice to have something later than 1.04 included in Linux releases. Actually 1.1 is included in debian unstable and testing and will be part of the upcoming release in a few weeks. (Thanks to Nick for his patience with that no so easy to

Re: [Nmh-workers] Nmh status - working on nmh

2004-09-16 Thread Chad Walstrom
Neil W Rickert wrote: nmh is rotten at the core. There is a lot of cruft, and probably buffer overflows galore in the many library routines. Please excuse my blasphemous inquiry. Has anyone looked at the GNU project mailutils? They've engineered their own MH access and manipulation library,

Re: [Nmh-workers] Nmh status - working on nmh

2004-09-16 Thread Earl Hood
On September 16, 2004 at 17:20, Harald Geyer wrote: Is there any sort of wish list for nmh development? There are a number of issues in the TODO list. I don't know who maintains it though. I feel most important is better mime support ... and of course cleaning up the code. Savannah