Neil W Rickert wrote: > nmh is rotten at the core. There is a lot of cruft, and probably > buffer overflows galore in the many library routines.
Please excuse my blasphemous inquiry. Has anyone looked at the GNU project "mailutils"? They've engineered their own MH access and manipulation library, provided some compatibility between nmh and their own mailutils-mh commands. It's not as complete as NMH, by any means, but I would be interested to hear what NMH developers/users have to say in comparison between the two projects. Should we promote some cross-project seeding and sharing of information? -- Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wookimus.net/ assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
