Re: [Nmh-workers] docs/COMPLETION-BASH.

2012-02-08 Thread norm
David Levine levin...@acm.org writes: Norm wrote: In the nmh-1.4 sources, there is a file, docs/COMPLETION-BASH. I assumed that it is a bash source file. But, from bash, source COMPLETION-BASH yields the error mesages: bash: COMPLETION-BASH: line 23: syntax error near unexpected

Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0

2012-02-08 Thread Ralph Corderoy
P. Maydell wrote: 441 12/18 Joel Uckelman o [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid QUO 442 12/18 Josh Bressers +oRe: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid 443 12/18 Paul Fox +oRe: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid 444 12/18 Joel Uckelman |+o Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid 448 12/19

Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0

2012-02-08 Thread Ken Hornstein
441 12/18 Joel Uckelman o [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid QUO 442 12/18 Josh Bressers +oRe: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid 443 12/18 Paul Fox +oRe: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid 444 12/18 Joel Uckelman |+o Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid 448 12/19 To:nmh-worker |

Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0

2012-02-08 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Ken, You know, I was wondering why I didn't remember the original message ... and that was because it was from 7 years ago! Yes, I was tackling my large backlog of nmh reading and at some point switched from my recent large backlog to my old large backlog, I too was confused about the

Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0

2012-02-08 Thread Joel Uckelman
Thus spake Lyndon Nerenberg: On 2012-02-08, at 11:40 AM, Ken Hornstein wrote: Since trn is a monolithic application it was easy to integrate it; I'm not sure how it would work in nmh. A separate command that printed a thread connectivity graph as message number s might have utility.

Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0

2012-02-08 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi Paul, (My ~/bin/readlp abuses lesskey(1) so little-used keys in less for reading email, e.g. D, do quit ^@, and this is picked up by the script which then adds it to the delete sequence and moves onto the next email to show. N - next, P - previous, S - spam, etc.) okay, that's

Re: [Nmh-workers] masquerade settings spost

2012-02-08 Thread Alexander Zangerl
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:02:15 EST, Ken Hornstein writes: yes! please either keep it, or improve post by giving it a switch that allows it to submit mail to an mta/msp program directly. E ... you know about the sendmail mts, right? i do indeed - but post always talks smtp, even with mts:

Re: [Nmh-workers] docs/COMPLETION-BASH.

2012-02-08 Thread David Levine
Norm wrote: Well,... I had never heard of a bash-completion package, so it wasn't clear, but now it is. Using Redhat 6.2, I installed bash_completion and put COMPLETION-BASH in /etc/bash_completion.d/. The result was that every time I hit the tab key I got a slew of error messages about

Re: [Nmh-workers] masquerade settings spost

2012-02-08 Thread David Levine
I've had this in my .mh_profile almost since I started using nmh: postproc: /usr/libexec/nmh/spost Wow, how did you ever know to use it? That's in the FAQ. Should be removed, I think. David ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org

Re: [Nmh-workers] masquerade settings spost

2012-02-08 Thread Ken Hornstein
On the other hand, I personally don't think any of this is important enough to spend a lot of cycles on, this isn't an area where nmh is really deficient. Well, I respectfully don't agree. You admit yourself that your setup is unusual; you control all of the components (including DNS) yourself.

Re: [Nmh-workers] masquerade settings spost

2012-02-08 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:36:10 -0500 From:Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com Message-ID: 201202071436.q17eaeal030...@hedwig.cmf.nrl.navy.mil | - Code simplification. That's what removing support for turning off | draft_from is about For what it is worth, in case it