--- Begin Message ---
Police Surveillance Tools from Special Services Group
Special Services Group, a company that sells surveillance tools to the FBI, DEA, ICE, and other US government agencies, has had its secret sales brochure published. Motherboard received the brochure as part of a
john doe wrote in <9019622b-d084-25ad-f574-c5a69be76...@mail.com>:
|On 1/8/2020 4:19 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
|> john doe wrote in :
|>|Hello all, and thank you for your answers.
|>|
|>|On 1/8/2020 3:07 PM, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
|>|>> As far as I understand it, NMH can not be used
Sorry about that forwarded message. I messed up trying out various
combinations of - mime and -forw.
Again my apologies
Hi aalinovi,
> I receive an html email which when I read it looks fine.
> However, when I try to forward it, it is forwarded as plain text with
> all of the html coding visible:
May we have the output of ‘mhlist -verbose ...’ run on both the original
email and the one that you forwarded to
I receive an html email which when I read it looks fine.
However, when I try to forward it, it is forwarded as plain text with
all of the html coding visible:
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2020/01/poli
ce_surveill.html">Police
On 1/8/2020 4:19 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> john doe wrote in :
> |Hello all, and thank you for your answers.
> |
> |On 1/8/2020 3:07 PM, Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> |> Hi John,
> |>
> |>> As far as I understand it, NMH can not be used directly with IMAP,so I
> |>> would like to use FDM for
Original message:
aalinovi:~$ mhlist -verbose
msg part type/subtype size description
4 text/html 2813
charset="us-ascii"
aalinovi:~$
Forwarded message:
alinovi:~$ mhlist
msg part type/subtype size description
112
>forw: -mime -annotate -nodash -format -editor vi
This is the problem. You can't have "-mime" and "-format". Well,
you CAN, but it doesn't do what you want. They basically cancel each
other out (like all nmh argument processing, the last argument wins).
If you use -mime, when you forw(1)
Hi Ken,
> If you use dist(1) it might be closer to what you want.
Arthur used to use dist IIRC, and moved to forw because of problems.
Shouldn't he drop the -format in this case?
--
Cheers, Ralph.
>> If you use dist(1) it might be closer to what you want.
>
>Arthur used to use dist IIRC, and moved to forw because of problems.
>Shouldn't he drop the -format in this case?
Yeah, probably. Although ... that's not wonderful either. I'm open
to ideas of how we could we could do this better.
Hi Ken,
> > Shouldn't he drop the -format in this case?
>
> Yeah, probably. Although ... that's not wonderful either. I'm open
> to ideas of how we could we could do this better.
Yes, I see what you mean. That forwards the whole email as the body of
a new one.
What Arthur's really after is
11 matches
Mail list logo
