Nick,
The subroutine CHECKMU in NMTRAN (for 7.2 and later) that checks the mu
variables starts by calling a recursive subroutine to
obtain complete right sides of all assignment statements.
E.g., suppose abbreviated code is
A=THETA(1)*EXP(ETA(1))
B=THETA(2)*EXP(ETA(2))
X=A
Z=X*B
After the re
Nick:
I can help further if I test out the control stream file.
Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D.
Vice President, Pharmacometrics, R&D
ICON Development Solutions
7740 Milestone Parkway
Suite 150
Hanover, MD 21076
Tel: (215) 616-6428
Mob: (925) 286-0769
Email: robert.ba...@iconplc.com
Web: www.iconplc.com
Bob,
This is a control stream used successfully with NM6. Therefore there are
no MU_X declarations (see question 1).
The intel and g95 compilers works fine with all other problems I've
tried. Its only with this strange warning/error situation that there
seems to be a difference between them.
Nick:
The MU warnings are completely passive. I do not know what your control stream
would have. Any MU_X declarations?
Link errors are caused by your intel compiler may not be set up properly. It
has nothing to do with NMTRAN errors and warnings.
Robert J. Bauer, Ph.D.
Vice President, Pharm
Hi,
I am trying to run a complex model developed with NM6 some years ago.
I'm trying to rerun the model using NM7.2.
I get the following messages from NM-TRAN:
" (MU_WARNING 24) INTERNAL ERROR IN NMTRAN: UNABLE TO CHECK USE OF MU_
VARIABLES.
These warning(s) are considered to be serious e
