Re: Thoughts on a NodeJS packaging group

I'd like to be in the SIG too, if you don't mind. I maintain Node.js in RHEL and it's in my best interest to keep fedora updated. Zuzana - Original Message - From: "Jared K. Smith" To: "Node.js on Fedora" Sent: Wednesday,

Re: lodash

Do I understand it correctly, that whenever I'll need a lodash.something dependency, I'll just need to require lodash package? - Original Message - From: "Tom Hughes" To: "Node.js on Fedora" Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2015 6:13:33 PM

Re: Plans for Node.js

There is a CVE, I am not sure if we have the fixed sources already. https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/cve-2015-8027_cve-2015-6764/ - Original Message - From: "Tom Hughes" To: "Node.js on Fedora" Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015

Re: sntp

Are these just the packages needed for npm? I'm just asking because I don't see nodejs-foo listed as a npm dependency and it looks pretty dead to me. - Original Message - From: "Jared K. Smith" To: "Node.js on Fedora" Sent:

Re: Intent to orphan nodejs

Hello, as a RHEL/CentOS SCL maintainer, I could spend some time maintaining Node.js in Fedora too. Between releases it might be around 10+hrs per week, otherwise I could spend around 4hrs on Fedora. Here's the thread about LTS:

Node.js security update

Hi, there's node.js security update coming tomorrow and since Stephen no longer has time for the package, I would like to take care of it. If anyone has any intention to update the package, please make sure we don't clash with the updates. Thank you Zuzka

Re: Node.js security update

In case you missed the announcement, the update was postponed by a week. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/nodejs-sec/pnACRfB7LBI - Original Message - From: "Zuzana Svetlikova" <zsvet...@redhat.com> To: "Node.js on Fedora" <nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: Node.js security update

Hi, the security update was released yesterday, Node.js in f23 and f24 is updated, the version available in Rawhide wasn't affected. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/nodejs-sec/pnACRfB7LBI Let me know if you have any issues. Zuzka - Original Message - From: "Zuzana Svetl

Re: Updating EPEL

Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 1:43:46 PM Subject: Re: Updating EPEL On 08/10/2016 05:29 AM, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote: > Hi, > > since nodejs currently present in EPEL is archaic and going EOL in ~7w, > it might be time to finally update it. > If anyone has any comments or suggestions,

Re: Updating EPEL

nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 9:57:52 PM Subject: Re: Updating EPEL On 08/10/2016 11:29 AM, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote: > Hi, > > since nodejs currently present in EPEL is archaic and going EOL in ~7w, > it might be time to finally update it. > If

Updating EPEL

Hi, since nodejs currently present in EPEL is archaic and going EOL in ~7w, it might be time to finally update it. If anyone has any comments or suggestions, I'm all ears. Otherwise I'll start with the update tomorrow or on Friday. Regards Zuzka ___

Re: Node.js doesn't build with GCC 7

For the record: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/8 https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/10388 - Original Message - From: "Stephen Gallagher" To: nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:35:17 PM Subject: Node.js doesn't build

Re: Segmentation fault using TLS after uprgrade to nodejs 6.7.0 / CentOS 7

That's strange, our builds fail with openssl 1.1.0b and nodejs v6.8.0 bundles openssl 1.0.2j. Did you try opening upstream issue? - Original Message - From: "Werner Fleck" To: nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 8:32:11

Re: Future of nodejs-0.10

Hi, to answer your question: no, we're not backporting, the 0.x releases has been unsupported by upstream for months. Dropping packages was the plan, but there are/were still some packages that depend on node, so we let it just sit there. Unfortunately we're not able to update to a newer version

Node.js 8 officially in rawhide

Hi, as announced, yesterday I built nodejs-8.1.2 in rawhide. Please, check that your packages work, especially native modules, as there seem to be a few incompatibilities. We also got new npm@5, which is said to be a little buggy. Regards Zuzka ___

Node.js v8.x in Fedora

Hi everyone, as there is nothing stopping us now, the nodejs package in Rawhide will soon be updated to Node.js v8.x. It also comes with npm@5 and new V8. Note that upstream has made a lot of changes and your projects/packages might have some issues. I'll update nodejs in rawhide next week, if

Re: nodejs packaging in Fedora

I was wondering, could we use bundling and clean up the mess that is current nodejs stack in Fedora? To be more precise, there are currently over 2000 packages and over 500 nodejs-* is available bugs, that nobody has time to fix and/or feels like fixing, because updating one module might/will

Re: Anyone up for packaging Antora

FYI https://gitlab.com/antora/antora/issues/264#note_122453475 Upstream should release new version of Antora without nodegit soon. On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:33 PM Jared K. Smith wrote: > Over the past year, I've made two attempts at starting to package Antora > properly. Both times, I got a

Node.js 14 in F33

Node.js v14.x was released last week, which should become LTS in autumn. modular builds for stable releases and rawhide are already submitted in Bodhi and should be available soon. I'd like to make it the default stream for F33 once it's tested a bit. I'd like to ask maintainers and users of

Re: [Bug 2075170] New: Review Request: npm - A JavaScript Package Manager

Hi. I see your point, but is this really *needed*? Has anyone ever complained about ugly release field, or is this just a cosmetic thing? Does npm being a separate package or being part of nodejs matter when it comes to npm modules parallel-instalable? Won't this cause discrepancies and give us