Re: sntp

2015-12-14 Thread Tom Hughes
On 14/12/15 12:08, Stephen Gallagher wrote: I'd go so far as to say that we should propose a modification to the packaging guidelines to state this explicitly. Would you like me to prepare a draft? Sounds good to me. Sometimes modules have extra entry points that can be loaded with variants

Re: sntp

2015-12-14 Thread Tom Hughes
On 14/12/15 15:25, Jared K. Smith wrote: I have packages either built or in process for the following: balanced-match brace-expansion builtin-modules concat-map escape-string-regexp graceful-readlink has-ansi is-builtin-module jju json-parse-helpfulerror os-homedir spdx-correct spdx-exceptions

Re: sntp

2015-12-14 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > We should probably create a wiki page with list of all the packages and > package updates that we know are needed along with bug numbers and/or who > is working on them? Quick and dirty wiki page created at

Re: sntp

2015-12-14 Thread Stephen Gallagher
> On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > >> On 14/12/15 08:05, Piotr Popieluch wrote: >> >> I'm glad I'm not the only one feeling this way. As careful I am trying >> to be I still end up overlooking some dependency. I wonder if it would >> be possible to reuse the

Re: sntp

2015-12-14 Thread Zuzana Svetlikova
lists.fedoraproject.org> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 5:31:46 PM Subject: Re: sntp On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Tom Hughes < t...@compton.nu > wrote: We should probably create a wiki page with list of all the packages and package updates that we know are needed along with bug

Re: sntp

2015-12-13 Thread Piotr Popieluch
On 12/13/2015 06:12 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > So we have a load more broken dependencies because sntp 2.x has been > pushed in rawhide but it requires nodejs 4.x. > > It seems it really does require 4.x as it uses various "harmony" > features, some of which don't even work under node 0.10 even with

Re: sntp

2015-12-13 Thread Stephen Gallagher
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: > > >> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: >> The remaining issue is updating the npm stack I think? > > Yes, that that's going to take quite a bit of work... Every time I sit down

Re: sntp

2015-12-13 Thread Jared K. Smith
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > The remaining issue is updating the npm stack I think? > Yes, that that's going to take quite a bit of work... Every time I sit down to try to tackle more of the dependencies, I end up losing a bit of my sanity. I'll try to