On 14/12/15 12:08, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I'd go so far as to say that we should propose a modification to the packaging
guidelines to state this explicitly. Would you like me to prepare a draft?
Sounds good to me.
Sometimes modules have extra entry points that can be loaded with variants
On 14/12/15 15:25, Jared K. Smith wrote:
I have packages either built or in process for the following:
balanced-match
brace-expansion
builtin-modules
concat-map
escape-string-regexp
graceful-readlink
has-ansi
is-builtin-module
jju
json-parse-helpfulerror
os-homedir
spdx-correct
spdx-exceptions
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> We should probably create a wiki page with list of all the packages and
> package updates that we know are needed along with bug numbers and/or who
> is working on them?
Quick and dirty wiki page created at
> On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:10 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 14/12/15 08:05, Piotr Popieluch wrote:
>>
>> I'm glad I'm not the only one feeling this way. As careful I am trying
>> to be I still end up overlooking some dependency. I wonder if it would
>> be possible to reuse the
lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 5:31:46 PM
Subject: Re: sntp
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Tom Hughes < t...@compton.nu > wrote:
We should probably create a wiki page with list of all the packages and package
updates that we know are needed along with bug
On 12/13/2015 06:12 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> So we have a load more broken dependencies because sntp 2.x has been
> pushed in rawhide but it requires nodejs 4.x.
>
> It seems it really does require 4.x as it uses various "harmony"
> features, some of which don't even work under node 0.10 even with
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>
>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> The remaining issue is updating the npm stack I think?
>
> Yes, that that's going to take quite a bit of work... Every time I sit down
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Tom Hughes wrote:
> The remaining issue is updating the npm stack I think?
>
Yes, that that's going to take quite a bit of work... Every time I sit down
to try to tackle more of the dependencies, I end up losing a bit of my
sanity. I'll try to