[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4389) ReplicationOperations().drain(..) may return too quickly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15450896#comment-15450896 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4389: -- Doesn't tell us much without the server-side context. >

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4432) Write test to assert that all ITs are categorized

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15450878#comment-15450878 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4432: -- bq. Is there a way to specify uncategorized tests? If so,

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4423) Define categories for integration test execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15450409#comment-15450409 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4423: -- Filed ACCUMULO-4432 to make the test for verify that all

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4432) Write test to assert that all ITs are categorized

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4432: Summary: Write test to assert that all ITs are categorized Key: ACCUMULO-4432 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4432 Project: Accumulo

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4423) Define categories for integration test execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15450277#comment-15450277 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4423: -- Thanks :3, your's and Christopher's quick review is

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4423) Define categories for integration test execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15450249#comment-15450249 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4423: -- Oops, one other thing. I believe we need to also verify

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4423) Define categories for integration test execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15450245#comment-15450245 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4423: -- Just put up #144 on GH for 1.7. This was pretty easy (once

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4423) Define categories for integration test execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15449733#comment-15449733 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4423: -- Cool, thanks. That was my take too (low-risk, test-only).

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4376) Introduce a Builders for "data" classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15449694#comment-15449694 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4376: -- [~melrief], to echo Christopher: definitely do not feel

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4423) Define categories for integration test execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15449370#comment-15449370 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4423: -- Are we interested in this for 1.7 and 1.8 branches too? >

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4428) GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead tservers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4428: - Assignee: Adam J Shook > GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead tservers >

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4428) GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead tservers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15446760#comment-15446760 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4428: -- bq. Happy to work on this and get you a PR – I need to

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4428) GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead tservers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15446412#comment-15446412 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4428: -- bq. I was thinking of just making the firstSeenDead map

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4424) Do not wait to start Thrift servers until lock is acquired

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15446262#comment-15446262 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4424: -- Tentatively tagged this to 2.0.0 for now. I am unsure

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4424) Do not wait to start Thrift servers until lock is acquired

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4424: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8.1) > Do not wait to start Thrift servers until lock is acquired >

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4428) GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead tservers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4428: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8.1) 1.8.0 > GC does not delete WAL files

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4428) GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead tservers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15446234#comment-15446234 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4428: -- He means each cycle the GC runs (it's "period") {code}

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4428) GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead tservers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4428: - Priority: Blocker (was: Major) > GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead tservers >

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4428) GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead tservers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15446198#comment-15446198 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4428: -- FYI [~mjwall], this sounds like the changes you introduced

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4428) GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead tservers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4428: - Fix Version/s: 1.8.1 1.7.3 > GC does not delete WAL files belonging to dead

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4425) VolumeIT.testDirtyReplaceVolumes fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4425: - Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Pushed this one for you,

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ACCUMULO-4425) VolumeIT.testDirtyReplaceVolumes fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15444116#comment-15444116 ] Josh Elser edited comment on ACCUMULO-4425 at 8/28/16 9:03 PM: --- bq. The

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4425) VolumeIT.testDirtyReplaceVolumes fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15444116#comment-15444116 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4425: -- bq. The label was the easiest first pass I thought of. I

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4425) VolumeIT.testDirtyReplaceVolumes fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15444083#comment-15444083 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4425: -- Also, the need to modify the tests to handle this worries

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4425) VolumeIT.testDirtyReplaceVolumes fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15444077#comment-15444077 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4425: -- The change looks good to me, but I feel like the whole

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4421) TraceServer should fall back to GENERIC_KERBEROS_PRINCIPAL when trace specific kerberos settings are not present

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439977#comment-15439977 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4421: -- With v3 and the addendum locally. {noformat} mvn clean

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4421) TraceServer should fall back to GENERIC_KERBEROS_PRINCIPAL when trace specific kerberos settings are not present

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439921#comment-15439921 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4421: -- Also, if it wasn't clear, I'm good with your v3 given your

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4421) TraceServer should fall back to GENERIC_KERBEROS_PRINCIPAL when trace specific kerberos settings are not present

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4421: - Attachment: ACCUMULO-4421-1.7.v3-addendum1.patch Here's an addendum on top of your v3

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4421) TraceServer should fall back to GENERIC_KERBEROS_PRINCIPAL when trace specific kerberos settings are not present

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439860#comment-15439860 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4421: -- bq. Josh Elser I think this is ready for review. The

[jira] [Resolved] (ACCUMULO-4414) Unnecessary INFO log spam from WorkMaker

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser resolved ACCUMULO-4414. -- Resolution: Fixed > Unnecessary INFO log spam from WorkMaker >

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4414) Unnecessary INFO log spam from WorkMaker

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4414: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8.1) 1.8.0 > Unnecessary INFO log spam from

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4426) Add ITs-via-mapreduce instructions to TESTING.md

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4426: - Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 1.8.0 > Add ITs-via-mapreduce instructions to

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4422) Logging should be initialized prior to attempting kerberos login

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4422: - Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Tests are passing for me on

[jira] [Resolved] (ACCUMULO-4426) Add ITs-via-mapreduce instructions to TESTING.md

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser resolved ACCUMULO-4426. -- Resolution: Fixed > Add ITs-via-mapreduce instructions to TESTING.md >

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4422) Logging should be initialized prior to attempting kerberos login

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439150#comment-15439150 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4422: -- Argh, sorry. I had a different test time out: {code}

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4422) Logging should be initialized prior to attempting kerberos login

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439147#comment-15439147 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4422: -- bq. shoot. I didn't think to test pre-patch on 1.8 since

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4421) TraceServer should fall back to GENERIC_KERBEROS_PRINCIPAL when trace specific kerberos settings are not present

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439141#comment-15439141 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4421: -- Thanks for catching this, Sean! I had it in my mind that

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4425) VolumeIT.testDirtyReplaceVolumes fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15439105#comment-15439105 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4425: -- Is this failing intermittently? >

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4426) Add ITs-via-mapreduce instructions to TESTING.md

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4426: Summary: Add ITs-via-mapreduce instructions to TESTING.md Key: ACCUMULO-4426 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4426 Project: Accumulo

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4423) Define categories for integration test execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15437836#comment-15437836 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4423: -- bq. Josh Elser the code to run the IT's in a MapReduce job

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4058) mvn test on ScannerContextIT will fail if test jar is not already built.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15437833#comment-15437833 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4058: -- Yeah, I don't think I care about users trying to run this

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4058) mvn test on ScannerContextIT will fail if test jar is not already built.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15437782#comment-15437782 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4058: -- bq. Do you have any thoughts on its "essential-ness" I

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4058) mvn test on ScannerContextIT will fail if test jar is not already built.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15437763#comment-15437763 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4058: -- Reduced to minor since workaround. > mvn test on

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4058) mvn test on ScannerContextIT will fail if test jar is not already built.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4058: - Priority: Minor (was: Critical) > mvn test on ScannerContextIT will fail if test jar is not

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4423) Define categories for integration test execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15437724#comment-15437724 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4423: -- bq. I've been spending a bit of time in recent days

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4424) Do not wait to start Thrift servers until lock is acquired

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4424: Summary: Do not wait to start Thrift servers until lock is acquired Key: ACCUMULO-4424 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4424 Project: Accumulo

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4423) Define categories for integration test execution

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15437687#comment-15437687 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4423: -- Hey Dima! No pitchforks at all! We're happy to have help

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4423) Define categories for integration test execution

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4423: Summary: Define categories for integration test execution Key: ACCUMULO-4423 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4423 Project: Accumulo

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4422) Logging should be initialized prior to attempting kerberos login

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15437562#comment-15437562 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4422: -- bq. the 1.8 branch is consistently failing the

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4422) Logging should be initialized prior to attempting kerberos login

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15437315#comment-15437315 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4422: -- +1 > Logging should be initialized prior to attempting

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4422) Logging should be initialized prior to attempting kerberos login

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15435110#comment-15435110 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4422: -- bq. I presume that precommit is busted? Yeah, I haven't

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4422) Logging should be initialized prior to attempting kerberos login

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15435132#comment-15435132 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4422: -- Oops! You're right, they were added in 1.7 with the client

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4422) Logging should be initialized prior to attempting kerberos login

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15435095#comment-15435095 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4422: -- +1 on -01 if {{mvn verify -Dit.test="Kerberos*IT"}} is

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4422) Logging should be initialized prior to attempting kerberos login

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4422?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15435072#comment-15435072 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4422: -- Hrm, I would have said that I thought this was the case,

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-2739) Create an In-Process MiniAccumuloCluster

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15433429#comment-15433429 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-2739: -- Just stumbled across an unexpected issue with this

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4419) Create Compressor factory allowing Compression settings to be updated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15433018#comment-15433018 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4419: -- Thanks, Marc! This is exactly what I was looking for. Some

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4419) Create Compressor factory allowing Compression settings to be updated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15432924#comment-15432924 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4419: -- bq. This ticket is to account for work done elsewhere in

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4420) Possible divide-by-zero exception when closing BatchWriter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15431999#comment-15431999 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4420: -- Thanks, Dan! > Possible divide-by-zero exception when

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4416) MAC failures when running on host configured with mixed-case hostname

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4416?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15431469#comment-15431469 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4416: -- bq. Isn't the Kerberos convention for the realm to use an

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4419) Create Compressor factory allowing Compression settings to be updated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15431173#comment-15431173 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4419: -- :thumbsup: > Create Compressor factory allowing

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4417) JUnit timeout rule not firing under circumstances of ACCUMULO-4416

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4417: Summary: JUnit timeout rule not firing under circumstances of ACCUMULO-4416 Key: ACCUMULO-4417 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4417 Project:

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4416) MAC failures when running on host configured with mixed-case hostname

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4416: Summary: MAC failures when running on host configured with mixed-case hostname Key: ACCUMULO-4416 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4416 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4415) Tracer requires instance.secret

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15428399#comment-15428399 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4415: -- bq. I wonder if it should just be its own project,

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4415) Tracer requires instance.secret

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15428345#comment-15428345 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4415: -- bq. Tracer registration used to be under the instance ID

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4415) Tracer requires instance.secret

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427312#comment-15427312 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4415: -- bq. It's arbitrary now. Users can provide anything. I

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4415) Tracer requires instance.secret

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427308#comment-15427308 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4415: -- bq. . Don't think trace contains anything sensitive. It's

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4415) Tracer requires instance.secret

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427300#comment-15427300 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4415: -- bq. I'm not really sure why we protect /tracers at all.

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4415) Tracer requires instance.secret

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15427285#comment-15427285 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4415: -- bq. The tracer does not use the Accumulo system

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4414) Unnecessary INFO log spam from WorkMaker

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4414: Summary: Unnecessary INFO log spam from WorkMaker Key: ACCUMULO-4414 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4414 Project: Accumulo Issue Type:

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4413) Copy/Sort column on WAL recovery table should not exceed 100%

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4413: Summary: Copy/Sort column on WAL recovery table should not exceed 100% Key: ACCUMULO-4413 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4413 Project: Accumulo

[jira] [Resolved] (ACCUMULO-4412) Race condition in starting proxy for ITs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser resolved ACCUMULO-4412. -- Resolution: Fixed > Race condition in starting proxy for ITs >

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4410) Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15425336#comment-15425336 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4410: -- Reducing the priority back again. When fixed ports are

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4410) Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4410: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8.0) 1.8.1 > Master didn't not resume balancing

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4410) Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4410: - Affects Version/s: 1.8.0 > Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4410) Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4410: - Priority: Critical (was: Blocker) > Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4410) Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15425315#comment-15425315 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4410: -- I finished my CI cycle, so I went ahead, reverted the

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4410) Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4410: - Fix Version/s: 1.8.0 > Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4410) Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4410: - Affects Version/s: (was: 1.8.0) > Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4410) Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4410: - Priority: Blocker (was: Critical) > Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4412) Race condition in starting proxy for ITs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15425244#comment-15425244 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4412: -- I have a test-only fix for this. Was able to verify that

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4411) HDFS block caches are not dynamically resized on configuration change.

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4411: Summary: HDFS block caches are not dynamically resized on configuration change. Key: ACCUMULO-4411 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4411 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4410) Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15424722#comment-15424722 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4410: -- I do have tserver.port.client=0 set in my configuration

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4410) Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4410: Summary: Master didn't not resume balancing after administrative tserver shutdown Key: ACCUMULO-4410 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4410

[jira] [Resolved] (ACCUMULO-4406) .out and .err files should have same naming convention as log files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser resolved ACCUMULO-4406. -- Resolution: Fixed Thanks for working with me on this, Dave. I think it's much better now

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4405: - Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Tested with {{verify

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4405: - Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8.1) 1.8.0 > GC collection cycle stuck on

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15421415#comment-15421415 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4405: -- Welp, I guess this got busted with the Java changes by

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4405: - Attachment: ACCUMULO-4405.001-1.7.patch .001 against 1.7. Ran {{verify -Psunny}} against 1.8,

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4405: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15421349#comment-15421349 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4405: -- Yep. I added a property to control this in the future and

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4405: - Affects Version/s: 1.7.1 1.7.2 > GC collection cycle stuck on

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15421258#comment-15421258 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4405: -- Looks like this came in via ACCUMULO-3683 in 1.7.0 > GC

[jira] [Updated] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated ACCUMULO-4405: - Fix Version/s: 1.7.3 > GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master >

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15421251#comment-15421251 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4405: -- Oh dear, this is worrisome. The comment on how long

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15421226#comment-15421226 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4405: -- bq. I also have to question why the RPC itself from the GC

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15421179#comment-15421179 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4405: -- I also have to question why the RPC itself from the GC did

[jira] [Created] (ACCUMULO-4405) GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master

Josh Elser created ACCUMULO-4405: Summary: GC collection cycle stuck on waitForFlush RPC to Master Key: ACCUMULO-4405 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4405 Project: Accumulo

[jira] [Resolved] (ACCUMULO-4403) Multiple hostname aliases breaks stop-here.sh

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser resolved ACCUMULO-4403. -- Resolution: Fixed > Multiple hostname aliases breaks stop-here.sh >

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4403) Multiple hostname aliases breaks stop-here.sh

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15420194#comment-15420194 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4403: -- Done. > Multiple hostname aliases breaks stop-here.sh >

[jira] [Commented] (ACCUMULO-4403) Multiple hostname aliases breaks stop-here.sh

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15420192#comment-15420192 ] Josh Elser commented on ACCUMULO-4403: -- Great, I like the array better. Will fix and commit.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >