[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17508266#comment-17508266
]
Daniil Ovchinnikov commented on GROOVY-9472:
> it is supposed to somehow guess that some of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17508220#comment-17508220
]
Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-9472:
-
>> If you include the class or classes that file1 generates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17508139#comment-17508139
]
Daniil Ovchinnikov commented on GROOVY-9472:
[~emilles]
> If you include the class or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17508065#comment-17508065
]
Jochen Theodorou commented on GROOVY-9472:
--
[~emilles][~paulk]
Maybe a solution would be to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17507909#comment-17507909
]
Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-9472:
-
If you include the class or classes that file1 generates on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17507786#comment-17507786
]
Daniil Ovchinnikov commented on GROOVY-9472:
More general problem: there should be *zero*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17507515#comment-17507515
]
Paul King commented on GROOVY-9472:
---
> * dynamic mode works fine as long as you do not reference the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17507476#comment-17507476
]
Jochen Theodorou commented on GROOVY-9472:
--
[~paulk] not sure I completely agree. For me the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17507462#comment-17507462
]
Paul King commented on GROOVY-9472:
---
Yes, there are definitely two sides to the situation.
On the one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17507389#comment-17507389
]
Jochen Theodorou commented on GROOVY-9472:
--
I have to add: Of course a normally declared inner
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17507387#comment-17507387
]
Jochen Theodorou commented on GROOVY-9472:
--
[~paulk] I never used the annotation because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17507373#comment-17507373
]
Paul King commented on GROOVY-9472:
---
[~blackdrag] I don't think anything has changed w.r.t the normal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17507015#comment-17507015
]
Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-9472:
-
GROOVY-10300 changes replaced the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17506756#comment-17506756
]
Jochen Theodorou commented on GROOVY-9472:
--
[~emilles] what did change so that PersonBuilder
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17160211#comment-17160211
]
Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-9472:
-
It is this block in {{ResolveVisitor}} that adds type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17160209#comment-17160209
]
Eric Milles commented on GROOVY-9472:
-
Is "import static a.B.C" supposed to work for type C nested
16 matches
Mail list logo