[jclouds » jclouds-labs
#1411](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1411/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-labs-pull-requests
#230](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/230/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/61#issuecomment-51878861
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/1187/
@@ -52,35 +60,55 @@
/**
* To get a service account and its private key see [TODO: write some
* documentation on the website and put a link to it]
-*
-* The first argument (args[0]) must be your service account email address
-* The second argument (args[1]) must a
@@ -108,8 +137,15 @@ private void createServer() throws RunNodesException,
TimeoutException {
.locationId(ZONE)
.hardwareId(getHardware().getId())
.imageId(getImage().getId())
-.build();
-
+
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google
#1230](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1230/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests
#110](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/110/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/39#issuecomment-51892643
@@ -108,8 +137,15 @@ private void createServer() throws RunNodesException,
TimeoutException {
.locationId(ZONE)
.hardwareId(getHardware().getId())
.imageId(getImage().getId())
-.build();
-
+
@@ -52,35 +60,55 @@
/**
* To get a service account and its private key see [TODO: write some
* documentation on the website and put a link to it]
-*
-* The first argument (args[0]) must be your service account email address
-* The second argument (args[1]) must a
[jclouds-java-6-pull-requests
#13](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-6-pull-requests/13/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/477#issuecomment-51892788
I couldn't find any existing unit test for this class, though I could be
looking in the wrong place(?), so a bit unclear how to start?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/39#issuecomment-51892917
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1084](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1084/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/477#issuecomment-51895761
[jclouds » jclouds
#1501](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1501/) ABORTED
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/477#issuecomment-51902333
- assertEquals(Iterables.getOnlyElement(newGroup.getIpPermissions()),
perm,
- Expecting IpPermission + perm + but group was +
newGroup);
+ singlePortBuilder.ipProtocol(IpProtocol.UDP);
+ singlePortBuilder.fromPort(41);
+ singlePortBuilder.toPort(41);
Thanks for the changes, @stuarthendren! Just one trivial comment that we can
also happily ignore. I just wanted to verify that you've run the live test and
it passes with your changes to support one-port ranges?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
I couldn't find any existing unit test for this class, though I could be
looking in the wrong place
No, I don't think you were. I couldn't find anything obvious either :-(
@abayer: what was the intention regarding unit or MockWebServer tests here?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it
Andrea Turli created JCLOUDS-662:
Summary: Can't attach multiple disks with same size to SoftLayer
CCI
Key: JCLOUDS-662
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-662
Project: jclouds
Checkstyle recommended me to do this. Reverted.
If Checkstyle recommended it, please put it back - we try to stick to
Checkstyle generally.
Thanks for the other updates, @najtmar. With this last change, looks good to me!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/andreaturli/jclouds fix/JCLOUDS-662
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479
-- Commit Summary --
* fix creation of blockDevices using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14094027#comment-14094027
]
Andrea Turli commented on JCLOUDS-662:
--
I've issued a PR to fix that at
[jclouds-java-6-pull-requests
#14](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-6-pull-requests/14/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51909257
for (VirtualGuestBlockDevice blockDevice :
virtualGuest.getVirtualGuestBlockDevices()) {
blockDevices.add(new BlockDevice(blockDevice.getDevice(),
blockDevice.getVirtualDiskImage().getCapacity()));
}
- return blockDevices.build();
+
@@ -71,17 +72,17 @@ public void testLaunchClusterWithMinDisk() throws
RunNodesException {
templateBuilder.imageId(CENTOS_6_64);
//templateBuilder.osFamily(OsFamily.CENTOS);
//templateBuilder.imageId(7bcd78dc-eb11-4e1b-8d93-111c62ed5fd1);
Unrelated to this PR, but:
//options.portSpeed(10);
// multi-disk option
- options.blockDevices(ImmutableSet.of(100));
+ //options.blockDevices(ImmutableList.of(25, 400, 400));
Is this commented-out on purpose?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Thanks, @andreaturli! Two minor questions:
* Can we get rid of the import reorderings in the PR?
* Can we remove the commented-out code in the live test?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51911791
[jclouds-java-6-pull-requests
#15](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-6-pull-requests/15/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51912839
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1085](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1085/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51913625
[jclouds-labs-pull-requests
#231](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/231/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/61#issuecomment-51914160
[jclouds » jclouds
#1502](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1502/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1502/changes
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1086](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1086/) FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51915333
[jclouds-java-6-pull-requests
#16](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-6-pull-requests/16/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51917382
jclouds-pull-requests #1086 FAILURE
Missing an import?
```
[ERROR] symbol: variable Lists
[ERROR] location: class org.jclouds.softlayer.binders.VirtualGuestToJson
[ERROR]
@@ -179,7 +215,7 @@ private Image getImage() {
/**
* Always close your service when you're done with it.
*/
- public void close() throws IOException {
+ public final void close() throws IOException {
Following the suggestion, the change has been reapplied.
---
Reply to
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1087](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1087/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51920634
[jclouds » jclouds
#1503](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1503/) FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1503/changes
Changes:
[Andrea Turli] fix creation of blockDevices using SoftLayerTemplateOptions
[Andrea Turli] address comments
--
[...truncated 26826 lines...]
... 30 more
[ERROR]
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+Apache jclouds labs
+Copyright 2009-2014 The Apache Software Foundation
+
+This product includes software developed at
+The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
+
+The VMWare vSphere API includes software developed at Cisco Systems, Inc
Thanks for the
+1 - looks good to me! Could you squash'n'rebase? Then we should be good to
merge!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/59#issuecomment-51921515
jclouds » jclouds #1503 FAILURE
This is still a compilation failure:
```
[ERROR] symbol: variable Collections
[ERROR] location: class org.jclouds.softlayer.binders.VirtualGuestToJson
[ERROR] - [Help 1]
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute goal
+1 - looks good to me. Thanks, @andreaturli! Just a squash'n'rebase and we are
good to go, as far as I'm concerned ;-)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51921955
squashed and rebased! thanks @demobox!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51922305
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+Apache jclouds labs
+Copyright 2009-2014 The Apache Software Foundation
+
+This product includes software developed at
+The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
+
+The VMWare vSphere API includes software developed at Cisco Systems, Inc
I talk with our
[jclouds-java-6-pull-requests
#17](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-6-pull-requests/17/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51922657
[jclouds-labs-pull-requests
#232](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/232/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/61#issuecomment-51925141
:-1: There are still failures with this PR. I spent a few hours last night
digging in to them with no avail. I believe that we should revert #443 for the
time being until the Mac OS filesystem integration can be thoroughly tested.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Any chance of getting this in?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/439#issuecomment-51926465
There are still failures with this PR
Could you post the failed tests? I'm also fine with reverting and re-opening
the corresponding PR.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/478#issuecomment-51926890
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1088](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1088/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51928381
Closed #59.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/59#event-151916757
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-examples.git;a=commit;h=e682ee8bf9762e350c64ee37694759a5996b71fb).
Thanks, @najtmar!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/59#issuecomment-51928991
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Phillips updated JCLOUDS-662:
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.8.1)
Can't attach multiple disks with same size to SoftLayer
@demobox The rabbit hole starts with the following exception:
```
testBlobMetadata_withDefaultMetadata(org.jclouds.filesystem.FilesystemAsyncBlobStoreTest)
Time elapsed: 0.113 sec FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: Wrong blob content-type expected
[application/unknown] but found [null]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14094162#comment-14094162
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-662:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Phillips updated JCLOUDS-662:
Attachment: JCLOUDS-662.patch
Can't attach multiple disks with same size to SoftLayer
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;h=8743e94).
@andreaturli: Does this also need backporting to 1.8.x? If so, could you open a
PR for that, using [the
patch](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12661225/JCLOUDS-662.patch)
attached to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Phillips updated JCLOUDS-662:
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Can't attach multiple disks with same size to SoftLayer CCI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14094171#comment-14094171
]
Andrea Turli commented on JCLOUDS-662:
--
This needs to be backported on 1.8.x as
Andrea Turli created JCLOUDS-663:
Summary: Backport JCLOUDS-662 to 1.8.x
Key: JCLOUDS-663
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-663
Project: jclouds
Issue Type: Bug
Any chance of getting this in?
@wernerb I don't see any technical reason (the one minor comment is easy to
fix), I was just uncertain whether we had come to a conclusion on the
discussion about deprecating other stuff.
@nacx Ping? And thoughts on this?
---
Reply to this email directly or
FYI: Live test in https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/477
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/39#issuecomment-51934713
Sure it should be in 1.8.x. I won't be able to commit it until Monday 18, but
feel free to take it if you have time! :)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/439#issuecomment-51935245
Sure it should be in 1.8.x.
Also master then, I guess?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/439#issuecomment-51935355
[jclouds-java-6-pull-requests
#18](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-6-pull-requests/18/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/477#issuecomment-51935536
Since the deprecation unfortunately didn't make it into 1.8.0, should we be
removing the methods _after_ 2.0.0, then?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/440#issuecomment-51936234
Not a big deal, as the deprecated methods delegate to the *good* ones. Removal
can wait.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/440#issuecomment-51936416
Yep, I see. That was because of my timing and vacations *sigh*. Anyway, there
is still no release inconsistency as deprecation is in 1.7.x and 1.8.x but no
released version has stil the fix. It will just come a bit later.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
There is PR #440 to be reopened against master which **removes** the methods
instead of deprecating. I think that one should be the one to go there, perhaps
after deprecating in master too, just for consistence?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
See #439
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds fix-496
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/481
-- Commit Summary --
* Use the security groups options in the portable
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds fix-496-1.8.x
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/480
-- Commit Summary --
* Use the security groups options in the portable
Closed #439.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/439#event-151962585
jclouds-java-6-pull-requests #20 FAILURE
Expected
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/481#issuecomment-51941764
[jclouds-java-6-pull-requests
#20](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-6-pull-requests/20/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/481#issuecomment-51941256
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1089](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1089/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/477#issuecomment-51941660
I didn't realize there was a dependency between the test methods.
Ah, interesting! Wasn't aware of that either, sorry.
It seems to require the file path of the .pem as the credential and the
others the RSA text
I seem to recall a recent change that allowed both. @ccustine I think it was
[jclouds » jclouds
#1505](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1505/) ABORTED
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/479#issuecomment-51946217
[jclouds-java-6-pull-requests
#19](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-java-6-pull-requests/19/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/480#issuecomment-51946931
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1090](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1090/)
UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/480#issuecomment-51947645
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1091](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1091/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/481#issuecomment-51947890
jclouds-pull-requests #1090 UNSTABLE
Spurious [test
failure](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/org.apache.jclouds$jclouds-compute/1090/testReport/junit/org.jclouds.compute.util/ConcurrentOpenSocketFinderTest/testChecksSocketsConcurrently/)
---
Reply to this email
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/org.apache.jclouds$jclouds-core/2716/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Phillips updated JCLOUDS-496:
Attachment: JCLOUDS-496.patch
TemplateOptions securityGroups() method doesn't work in
Committed to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;h=95b6064)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/481#issuecomment-51948636
Closed #481.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/481#event-151989612
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14094370#comment-14094370
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-496:
-
Commit
Closed #480.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/480#event-151989809
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14094366#comment-14094366
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-496:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Phillips updated JCLOUDS-496:
Fix Version/s: 1.8.1
TemplateOptions securityGroups() method doesn't work in
@ccustine: Do we have a PR planned to update the guide to demonstrate the
region property?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/commit/1e7df91e259932d85476a41bbcfaddf72817b59a#commitcomment-7360198
Thx @demobox!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/480#issuecomment-51950179
Thanks! :)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/481#issuecomment-51950237
@@ -332,6 +334,30 @@ public void testListContainer() throws
InterruptedException, ExecutionException,
}
+ @Test(groups = { integration, live })
+ public void testListContainerGetBlobSize() throws Exception {
+ String containerName = getContainerName();
+ try {
+
super(id, name, location, uri, userMetadata);
this.eTag = eTag;
this.creationDate = creationDate;
this.lastModified = lastModified;
this.type = checkNotNull(type, type);
+ this.size = size;
+ }
+
+ /** @deprecated use 10-argument variant of
@jdaggett Can you please test this on Mac OS X and make the changes necessary
to skip the failing integration tests on that platform?
As previously stated, this pull request needs changes for Mac OS X to skip
running the four tests that all platforms previously skipped. Given that this
@@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ public void testWithoutToken() {
protected SetDirectoryEntry values() {
BuilderDirectoryEntry expected = ImmutableSet.builder();
expected.add(new
DirectoryEntry(4980cdb2a411106a04a4538c92a1b204ad92077de6e3,
FileType.DIRECTORY,
-
@andrewgaul +1 Just a few comments to address and this should be good to merge.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/465#issuecomment-51952940
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
*/
MILLISECOND_PRECISION,
+ // TODO: how to use this?
Extra comment?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/465/files#r16130759
Sorry I missed this earlier. I will take a look at this later today.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/465#issuecomment-51953773
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/org.apache.jclouds$jclouds-core/2717/
this pull request needs changes for Mac OS X to skip running the four tests
Should we be _skipping_ the tests? Doesn't the code now simply say that, if the
appropriate view is not supported, the values we are comparing should be null?
In that case, I can imagine two tests split by a
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
