See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/1028/
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/org.apache.jclouds.labs$jdbc/1028/
@nacx I submitted a pull request for the BaseJdbcBlobStoreTest.
I found a two failing tests in the EclipselinkH2ContainerIntegrationTest and
HibernateHsqldbContainerIntegrationTest will work on fixing those up as well.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14609373#comment-14609373
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-857:
-
Perhaps relevant:
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/org.apache.jclouds.labs$jdbc/1031/changes
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/1031/changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14609297#comment-14609297
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-930:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14609298#comment-14609298
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-930:
-
Commit
This allows building private forks with non-conflicting versions, since the
current regular expression matching sematic versions is very restrictive.
Versions such as `1.9.1-org-name.1` (for the first build of version 1.9.1 by
some organisation) should be allowed. All of the checks for alpha or
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-guava-17-18/GUAVA_VERSION=18.0,jdk=OpenJDK%207%20(latest)/318/
--
[...truncated 13183 lines...]
Test suite progress: tests succeeded: 57, failed: 0, skipped: 2.
Starting test
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-guava-17-18/GUAVA_VERSION=17.0,jdk=OpenJDK%207%20(latest)/318/
--
[...truncated 13692 lines...]
Test suite progress: tests succeeded: 57, failed: 0, skipped: 2.
Starting test
Use #getNetworks from TemplateOptions; Fallback to default value if invalid.
Can a server be attached to more than one network?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/145#issuecomment-117120899
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14608246#comment-14608246
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-702:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14608244#comment-14608244
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-702:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-702:
---
Assignee: Reijhanniel Jearl Campos
Create ProfitBricks Provider
Closed #792.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/792#event-344193818
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-702.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.9.1
2.0.0
Create
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-702:
---
Labels: profitbricks (was: )
Create ProfitBricks Provider
Forgot to adjust tests in `JcloudsVersionTest` to accept new strings. But,
since I'm not sure this is the right solution, having tried writing a new
regexp that parses semver metadata using `+` syntax, it introduces too much
complexity, so closing for now.
---
Reply to this email directly or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera updated JCLOUDS-702:
---
Affects Version/s: 1.9.0
Create ProfitBricks Provider
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/org.apache.jclouds.labs$jdbc/1029/
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/changes
Closed #145.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/145#event-344184478
Pushed to
[master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/17a838b2)
and
[1.9.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/d07fcb17).
Thanks for all the effort @devcsrj!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@timuralp It seems there are also regressions in
[jclouds-labs/jdbc](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/view/public/job/jclouds-labs/1028/org.apache.jclouds.labs$jdbc/testReport/).
Mind fixing it too?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Instead of hacking the version, I think the right approach for forks would be
to change the groupId. If at some point other software ends up depending on a
fork that has more features (or features not yet merged in jclouds) it is
*technically* not depending on jclouds, so I think the right
Timur and I are out at a conference all day, @rcoedo could you investigate
these failing tests in JDBC blobstore?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/791#issuecomment-117194871
I can take a look at this later today.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/791#issuecomment-117437852
We should not append a / to the marker when returning list results
in the case of directories (RELATIVE_PATH), as the names will already
include the delimiter.
Added a jclouds test to catch such regressions in the local store in
the future.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request
Also, looking at the failures, this is identical to the test that was fixed for
the file system blobstore (the test expected common prefixes to not include the
delimiter -- the one significant change from the JCLOUDS-930 pull request).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@nacx I will try to look at the failures tonight unless anyone gets to it
before I do.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/791#issuecomment-117238141
@nacx I'll take a look today, sorry.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/778#issuecomment-117210463
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14608633#comment-14608633
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-930:
-
Commit
:+1: Tests run fine for me in several regions and the change looks good.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/183#issuecomment-117297454
@@ -47,6 +48,10 @@ public void testCreateUpdateAndDeleteSecurityGroup() {
try {
sgApi = api.getSecurityGroupApi(region).get();
+for (Subnet subnet :
api.getSubnetApi(region).list().concat().toList()) {
+ System.out.println(subnet: +
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an AS IS BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
@zack-shoylev could you please review it?
I'd like to merge that on master and 1.9.x if you think it is ok
LiveTests are ok for me, but `removeFirewallRuleFromPolicy` as it seems that
the
[doc](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PJaKvsX2MzMRlLGfR0fBkrMraHYF0flvl0sqyZ704tA/edit#)
is not
+ FirewallRule createFirewallRule(@WrapWith(firewall_rule) FirewallRule
firewallRule);
+
+ @Named(firewall:listFirewallRules)
+ @GET
+ @Transform(FirewallRuleToPagedIterable.class)
+ @ResponseParser(ParseFirewallRules.class)
+ @Fallback(EmptyPagedIterableOnNotFoundOr404.class)
Yes, I fixed thay locally but then a couple integration test failures appeared
in the `testDirectory` method that escape to my knowledge right now.
I preferred to comment it here so it can have a proper fix. Thanks for having a
look at this!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on
Yes, it does.
To make sure everything is closed when closing the context, a nice approach
would be to make the SSH clients also implement `Closeable` and let the close
method call the disconnect one. This would allow us to modify the `create`
method in the ssh client factory to register the
+ @Named(firewall_policy_id)
+ private String firewallPolicyId;
+
+ @ConstructorProperties({id, tenant_id, name, description,
admin_state_up,
+ status, firewall_policy_id})
+ protected Firewall(String id, String tenantId, String name, String
description, boolean
+ FirewallRule createFirewallRule(@WrapWith(firewall_rule) FirewallRule
firewallRule);
+
+ @Named(firewall:listFirewallRules)
+ @GET
+ @Transform(FirewallRuleToPagedIterable.class)
+ @ResponseParser(ParseFirewallRules.class)
+ @Fallback(EmptyPagedIterableOnNotFoundOr404.class)
@@ -47,6 +48,10 @@ public void testCreateUpdateAndDeleteSecurityGroup() {
try {
sgApi = api.getSecurityGroupApi(region).get();
+for (Subnet subnet :
api.getSubnetApi(region).list().concat().toList()) {
+ System.out.println(subnet: +
Yay! Note that v1 is also affected but I won't apply this change there as the
change in the image id can break existing code (for example the Jenkins
plugin). This is something that can be expected when migrating from v1 to v2.
Thanks for the feedback @ccustine!
---
Reply to this email
@nacx I didn't tried your code by hand, but I think we have different
observations because in your example `channel` was not closed -- without my
commit even manual closing of channel lead to leaked sessions.
If closing of channel sessions when context closed is desirable, then we should
Also, take into account that if at some point the forked version needs to be
published, say in Maven Central, then having a groupId different than the
jclouds one is a must, so I'd say using a custom groupId is the easiest way to
go for both jclouds and its forks.
---
Reply to this email
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14607571#comment-14607571
]
Andrew Gaul commented on JCLOUDS-944:
-
We also need prefix support stubbed out here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14607567#comment-14607567
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-930:
-
Commit
@danbroudy We need to add prefix support to GCS before promoting it.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/161#issuecomment-117000203
rebuild please
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/791#issuecomment-116996325
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google/org.apache.jclouds.labs$google-cloud-storage/707/changes
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google/707/changes
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-guava-17-18/GUAVA_VERSION=17.0,jdk=OpenJDK%207%20(latest)/317/changes
Changes:
[timur.alperovich] JCLOUDS-930: Regression in a File System test.
--
[...truncated 29606 lines...]
Test suite progress: tests
Ignasi Barrera created JCLOUDS-951:
--
Summary: Remove inheritance in ProfitBrick's AutoValue classes
Key: JCLOUDS-951
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-951
Project: jclouds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-946.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
The ImageExtension in DigitalOcean only
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/org.apache.jclouds.provider$rackspace-clouddatabases-uk/3192/
--
Started calculate disk usage of build
Finished Calculation of disk usage of build in 0 seconds
Started calculate disk usage of workspace
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/org.apache.jclouds.labs$jdbc/1030/
Thanks @zack-shoylev
I've addressed your comments:
- I've added AutoValue for Firewall, FirewallPolicy and FirewallPolicyRule
- Add PaginatedCollection where possible
and some other minor fixes
Does it look better now?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-613?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ignasi Barrera resolved JCLOUDS-613.
Resolution: Fixed
Implement the DigitalOcean v2 API
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14609088#comment-14609088
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-946:
-
Commit
Closed #183.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/183#event-344707120
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/3192/changes
Changes:
[Andrew Gaul] Use prefix instead of marker to list MPU parts
--
[...truncated 38500 lines...]
[ERROR] mvn goals -rf :rackspace-clouddatabases-uk
[JENKINS] Archiving
Squashed, rebased, and pushed to master as
[c001f260](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/c001f260).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/183#issuecomment-117344560
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs/changes
64 matches
Mail list logo
