Hmm, from my side I've improved the test, but nobody pushed it forward?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/320#issuecomment-59883069
[jclouds-labs-pull-requests
#328](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/328/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/61#issuecomment-59885649
[jclouds » jclouds-labs
#1727](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1727/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://code.google.com/p/powermock/issues/detail?id=504
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/61#issuecomment-59886644
- /**
-* Specifies the name for the virtual machine. The name must be unique
-* within Windows Azure.
-*/
- private final String roleName;
+ /** Specifies the name for the virtual machine. The name must be unique
within Windows Azure. */
Actually this is not true.
+import javax.inject.Inject;
+
+import org.jclouds.googlecomputeengine.options.DiskCreationOptions;
+import org.jclouds.http.HttpRequest;
+import org.jclouds.rest.MapBinder;
+import org.jclouds.rest.binders.BindToJsonPayload;
+
+public class DiskCreationBinder implements MapBinder {
+
+
Hi @nacx ,
The merge turn to be very URGENT for me,
My dependent project need to be built and I need the snapshot version of this
JAR.
thanks
Izek
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/61#issuecomment-59907126
@andrewgaul @demobox Care to comment here?
If I don't hear from you by the end of the week and this test passes another
build, I'll go ahead and merge it.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/320#issuecomment-59918478
@kstyrc Sorry for the long pause - this must have slipped through the net
somewhere :-(
Code itself looks fine to me. Just going to bump this to trigger the PR
builders once more. Thanks for sticking with this!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#217](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/217/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/320#issuecomment-59920998
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1306](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1306/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/320#issuecomment-59924337
[jclouds » jclouds
#1816](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1816/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Closed #576.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/576#event-181515269
Merged to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=ad6675281195afabfeb2e520d980c12280aa11ac)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/576#issuecomment-59928735
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/2819/changes
Changes:
[Andrew Phillips] Minor code cleanup in Apache HC config module
--
[...truncated 20469 lines...]
[INFO] jclouds Rackspace Next Generation Cloud Servers provider SKIPPED
[INFO] jclouds
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/org.apache.jclouds.api$openstack-keystone/2819/
--
[...truncated 505 lines...]
Test suite progress: tests succeeded: 87, failed: 0, skipped: 0.
[pool-22-thread-3] Test
- /**
-* Specifies the name for the virtual machine. The name must be unique
-* within Windows Azure.
-*/
- private final String roleName;
+ /** Specifies the name for the virtual machine. The name must be unique
within Windows Azure. */
Thanks! There are a lot of
Merged to
[master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-labs-openstack.git;a=commit;h=9e2049dbd1a72922446e832b548e0a102d79d26d).
Thanks for sticking with this!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14178491#comment-14178491
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-184:
-
Commit
Merged to master.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds.git;a=commit;h=b220d889ca86b81d8d3badccd52215a9bf613529
Thanks @kstyrc!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/320#issuecomment-59943328
Closed #320.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/320#event-181573216
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Everett Toews closed JCLOUDS-184.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Improve AzureBlob Unit Tests
See https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/2820/changes
See
https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/org.apache.jclouds.api$openstack-keystone/2820/
+networktype: Advanced,
+securitygroupsenabled: false,
+tags: []
+},
+{
+id: 2,
+name: Chicago,
+networktype: Advanced,
+securitygroupsenabled: true,
+tags: [
+
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
ipaddress: 10.27.27.64,
startport: 22,
endport: 22,
-state: Active
+state: Active,
+
tags:[{account:1,domain:ROOT,domainid:1,key:some-tag,resourceid:66,
resourcetype:PortForwardingRule,
@@ -166,6 +183,13 @@ public static ListSnapshotsOptions volumeId(String
volumeId) {
public static ListSnapshotsOptions projectId(String projectId) {
return new ListSnapshotsOptions().projectId(projectId);
}
+
+ /**
+ * @see
+public interface TagApi {
+
+ /**
+* Lists tags
+*
+* @param options
+* if present, how to constrain the list.
+* @return tags matching query, or empty set, if no tags are found
+*/
+ @Named(listTags)
+ @GET
+ @QueryParams(keys = { command,
+
+ public static ResourceType fromValue(String resourceType) {
+ Integer code = Integer.valueOf(checkNotNull(resourceType,
resourcetype));
+ return INDEX.containsKey(code) ? INDEX.get(code) : UNRECOGNIZED;
+ }
+ }
+
+ public static Builder? builder() {
+
+import com.google.common.base.MoreObjects;
+import com.google.common.base.MoreObjects.ToStringHelper;
+import com.google.common.base.Objects;
+import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
+import com.google.common.collect.Maps;
+import org.jclouds.javax.annotation.Nullable;
+
+/**
+ *
The tags aren't really confusing - they're just overly verbose, as it were. And
yeah, as a copy-paste-coder, I always just use the style in place in the
existing code in the API rather than diverging - maybe not ideal, but makes it
much easier to read and maintain, IMO.
---
Reply to this email
Heh I would clarify that it is read and maintainence neutral. There's
nothing easy to read about ConcreteBuilder :)
Anyways. Thanks and carry-on!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-59956593
Ah, but it is easier to maintain an API when the entire API is doing the same
thing, even if that thing is a bit wonky. =)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-59957942
It also has a side benefit of making adrian's hands shake just about enough
for him to cleanse the whole api of its sins.. :)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-59961813
:+1: yay :)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack/pull/163#issuecomment-59962019
..that too, yes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-59962160
+import javax.inject.Inject;
+
+import org.jclouds.googlecomputeengine.options.DiskCreationOptions;
+import org.jclouds.http.HttpRequest;
+import org.jclouds.rest.MapBinder;
+import org.jclouds.rest.binders.BindToJsonPayload;
+
+public class DiskCreationBinder implements MapBinder {
+
+
[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests
#169](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/169/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/58#issuecomment-59962843
See
https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1503/changes
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google
#1503](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1503/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-labs-pull-requests
#329](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/329/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/70#issuecomment-59972254
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1731/changes
Changes:
[kulakov.ilya] CloudSigma2 ComputeService.
--
[...truncated 2542 lines...]
[INFO] Exclude: **/*.eml
[INFO] Exclude: **/*.ipr
[INFO] Exclude: **/*.iws
[INFO] Exclude:
[jclouds » jclouds-labs
#1731](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1731/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-labs-pull-requests
#330](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/330/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/70#issuecomment-59974418
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#218](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/218/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-59976074
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14178808#comment-14178808
]
Joseph Laudadio commented on JCLOUDS-615:
-
I just wanted to report that I'm
See https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1732/changes
[jclouds » jclouds-labs
#1732](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1732/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds » jclouds
#1819](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1819/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#219](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/219/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-59992025
+
+ private static final String FAKE_SOURCE_IMAGE =
https://www.googleapis.com/compute/v1/projects/; +
+
debian-cloud/global/images/backports-debian-7-wheezy-v20141017;
+
+ Json json = new GsonWrapper(new Gson());
+
+ @Test
+ public void
[jclouds-site-pull-requests
#420](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/420/)
FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/138#issuecomment-59992828
Just one last minor in the test. Mind removing that line, squashing and
rebasing to the latest master? Then it will be ready to merge Thanks!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/58#issuecomment-59992753
Closed #139.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/139#event-181764956
Committed to [master as
[ce44fd5](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-site.git;a=commit;h=ce44fd57df012e851a248524930072f6e1281b43).
There were some concerns expressed offline about adding the Clocker talk to the
post. There are other talks on projects in the jclouds ecosystem,
[jclouds-site-pull-requests
#421](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-site-pull-requests/421/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/138#issuecomment-59994398
Go to
http://a989b96f8a7e6c6dc3c9-98845488d1067462a457fd6a2981b7bc.r44.cf5.rackcdn.com/
to review your changes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/138#issuecomment-59994569
+
+ public static ResourceType fromValue(String resourceType) {
+ Integer code = Integer.valueOf(checkNotNull(resourceType,
resourcetype));
+ return INDEX.containsKey(code) ? INDEX.get(code) : UNRECOGNIZED;
+ }
+ }
+
+ public static Builder? builder() {
+
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1308](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1308/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-59995901
I took a stab at providing detailed API changes in the release notes for
OpenStack Swift. Go to
$BASE_URL/releasenotes/1.8.1/api-changes/openstack-swift/ to see them.
Also fixed the error we were seeing earlier. Liquid didn't like the xx in the
date field.
---
Reply to this email directly or
@demobox I think all comments are addressed now.
The only remaining bit is the visibility of the maps in the module class, but
the option is to move them to their own class/function, which won't make it
less visible to users. They are already annotated as visible for testing, but
would be
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#220](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/220/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-6255
Ok, live tests added and they pass - I think that suffices. Squashing now.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-6354
[jclouds » jclouds
#1820](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1820/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#221](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/221/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-6632
LGTM (gripes noted)
Thanks, Andrew!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-60001711
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1310](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1310/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-60004237
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1309](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1309/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-60004238
Done. Thank you for the timely feedback!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/58#issuecomment-60004487
[jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests
#170](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-google-pull-requests/170/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/58#issuecomment-60004512
[jclouds » jclouds-labs-google
#1506](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs-google/1506/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds » jclouds
#1821](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1821/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds » jclouds
#1822](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1822/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14179313#comment-14179313
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-756:
-
Commit
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#222](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/222/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-60017625
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1311](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1311/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-60019651
Ok, added the tags/userMetadata to NodeMetadata, ComputeService-driven node
creation, etc. I'm calling this done with another PR to come later on general
live test cleanup/fixes.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#223](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/223/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-60019921
[jclouds-pull-requests-java-6
#224](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests-java-6/224/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-60020102
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1312](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1312/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-60021601
[jclouds-pull-requests
#1313](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-pull-requests/1313/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/578#issuecomment-60021701
[jclouds » jclouds
#1824](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1824/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
[jclouds » jclouds
#1825](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds/1825/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
This cleans up the last input objects and ensures current naming matches azure
terminology (even if XML doesn#39;t)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee460799.aspx.
Next change will be bumping the version to latest, after that building compute
service, finally any trimming of unneeded or
[jclouds-labs-pull-requests
#331](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-labs-pull-requests/331/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/95#issuecomment-60037287
[jclouds » jclouds-labs
#1740](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-labs/1740/)
SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
86 matches
Mail list logo
