Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Introduce BlobstoreCli (#487)

Closed #487. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/487#event-1007818464

[jira] [Resolved] (JCLOUDS-1259) Missing StorageClass for buckets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul resolved JCLOUDS-1259. -- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Andrew Gaul Fix Version/s: 2.0.2

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1259) Missing StorageClass for buckets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15933960#comment-15933960 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1259: -- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-1259) Missing StorageClass for buckets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15933958#comment-15933958 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JCLOUDS-1259: -- Commit

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-114) Support OpenStack Keystone v3 API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15933799#comment-15933799 ] Apoorva commented on JCLOUDS-114: - As per Keystone community, API v2 will be removed in Q release. At

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1259) Missing StorageClass for buckets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1259: - Component/s: jclouds-blobstore > Missing StorageClass for buckets >

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1259) Missing StorageClass for buckets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Gaul updated JCLOUDS-1259: - Labels: google-cloud-storage (was: ) > Missing StorageClass for buckets >

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Improve vagrant docs (#373)

Addressed comments. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/373#issuecomment-287872812

Re: [jclouds/jclouds] Create and attach tests sources as artifacts (#1079)

nacx approved this pull request. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1079#pullrequestreview-27943221

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Add back the cloudsigma-api feature for backwards compatibility (#99)

I don't think so. The changes upgrade the version of karaf so we don't want them in the bugfix branches. Thanks for your help on this! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Attach config files referenced in the features as artifacts (#100)

> All checks have passed Yay! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/100#issuecomment-287810974

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-cli #1307

See -- [...truncated 574.76 KB...] Downloading: https://repository-jclouds.forge.cloudbees.com/release/org/sonatype/sisu/inject/guava-parent/0.9.9/guava-parent-0.9.9.pom Downloading:

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-1260) AzureTemplateOptions support for windowsConfiguration section

Valentin Aitken created JCLOUDS-1260: Summary: AzureTemplateOptions support for windowsConfiguration section Key: JCLOUDS-1260 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1260 Project:

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-cli #1306

See -- [...truncated 57.50 KB...] [INFO] Exclude: **/TODO [INFO] Exclude: .mailmap [INFO] Exclude: .idea/** [INFO] Exclude: **/*.iml [INFO] Exclude: **/.project [INFO] Exclude:

[jclouds/jclouds] Create and attach tests sources as artifacts (#1079)

Will create `-test-sources.jar` corresponding to the `-tests.jar` binaries. Analogously to the sources generated for the release jar. Very useful when writing tests in the IDE, needing to consult other test files we are depending on (say `BaseContextLiveTest`). You can view, comment on, or merge

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Add back the cloudsigma-api feature for backwards compatibility (#99)

Closed #99. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/99#event-1007011054

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Add back the cloudsigma-api feature for backwards compatibility (#99)

Merged to [master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-karaf.git;a=commit;h=7006c512427d70ba3c748f4e4a13c5f7546f4dd9). Thanks, Svet! @neykov @andreaturli @nacx Does this or any of the related changes here or in jclouds-cli need backporting to any other branches, by the way? --

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Add back the cloudsigma-api feature for backwards compatibility (#99)

[From Svet](https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/37#issuecomment-287800676): "Tested successfully..." -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Attach config files referenced in the features as artifacts (#100)

Closed #100. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/100#event-1007004294

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Attach config files referenced in the features as artifacts (#100)

Merged to [master](https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jclouds-karaf.git;a=commit;h=1c1270c12bd467299154819caf513ff7ae95135e). Thanks, @neykov! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Add back the cloudsigma-api feature for backwards compatibility (#99)

> though "it shouldn't matter (tm)" :). _grin_. Thanks for running the tests again! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/99#issuecomment-287795600

Build failed in Jenkins: jclouds-labs-openstack-2.0.x-branch #52

See -- Started by upstream project "jclouds-labs-2.0.x-branch" build number 63 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change Building remotely on afb5256a

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1257] Initial support ManagedDataDisks (#372)

danielestevez commented on this pull request. > + public void deleteImageResourceDoesNotExist() { + assertNull(api().delete(imageName)); + } + + @Test(dependsOnMethods = "deleteImageResourceDoesNotExist") + public void CreateVirtualMachineImageFromExistingVM() { + String id =

Jenkins build is back to normal : jclouds-labs #1505

See

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-cli] Reference super features in assembly module (#37)

Tested successfully on top of both https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/100 and https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/99. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

[jira] [Updated] (JCLOUDS-1259) Missing StorageClass for buckets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Francois Rigault updated JCLOUDS-1259: -- Description: When calling BlobStore.putBlob the object is created but we receive an

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1257] Initial support ManagedDataDisks (#372)

danielestevez commented on this pull request. > +import org.jclouds.rest.annotations.ResponseParser; +import org.jclouds.rest.annotations.SelectJson; +import org.jclouds.rest.binders.BindToJsonPayload; + +@Path("/resourcegroups/{resourcegroup}/providers/Microsoft.Compute/images")

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

makes sense please remember to open a jira issue to track the improvements you want to make. merged at [2.0.x](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/69ef8765) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Attach config files referenced in the features as artifacts (#100)

> Test Result (1 failure / +1) org.jclouds.karaf.itests.FeatureInstallationTest.testApiOpenstackSwiftFeature Does that seem like a random failure, or would that be expected in any way? Will trigger a re-run to find out. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Attach config files referenced in the features as artifacts (#100)

retest this please -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/100#issuecomment-287796266

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

I prefer to put effort in supporting more windowsconfiguration parameters in the TemplateOptions rather than focusing on this bit. I'd like to pick this simple change in 2.0.x as well. Thanks. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

merged at [master](http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/jclouds-labs/commit/2fe3e0c1) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/371#issuecomment-287792683

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

Closed #371. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/371#event-1006888516

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

does it need to be backport to 2.0.x, @bostko ? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/371#issuecomment-287792337

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

+1 merging -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/371#issuecomment-287791413

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Azurecompute - additional templateOptions for WindowsProvisioningConfiguration (#371)

@andreaturli Are you happy to merge this without the ListenerProtocol you suggested, or would you like to see that implemented? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-cli] Reference super features in assembly module (#37)

Nice find @demobox, @nacx - added it back in https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/100. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-cli/pull/37#issuecomment-287789846

[jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Attach config files referenced in the features as artifacts (#100)

Adds back (a bit simplified) the maven config which creates artifacts out of the config files used in the feature.xml. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/100 -- Commit Summary -- * Attach config files referenced in

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-karaf] Add back the cloudsigma-api feature for backwards compatibility (#99)

Good spot @demobox. Updated. Now testing with jclouds-cli, though "it shouldn't matter (tm)" :). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/99#issuecomment-287786218

[jira] [Created] (JCLOUDS-1259) Missing StorageClass for buckets

Francois Rigault created JCLOUDS-1259: - Summary: Missing StorageClass for buckets Key: JCLOUDS-1259 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-1259 Project: jclouds Issue Type:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1257] Initial support ManagedDataDisks (#372)

Thanks @nacx for your review, the impl was a bit raw but I wanted to open the PR to start the discussion in the open, especially with @danielestevez As for the plan, yes it is exactly what I had in mind! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] Improve vagrant docs (#373)

nacx commented on this pull request. Thanks @neykov! Great docs! There is a small checkstyle violation that needs to be addressed:

Re: [jclouds/jclouds-labs] [JCLOUDS-1257] Initial support ManagedDataDisks (#372)

nacx requested changes on this pull request. Looks like a great start, thanks @andreaturli! Once this is cleaned up and tests passing the next steps could be (if I'm not wrong): * Remove the method that creates an storage service in the base live test class and update the test methods