This avoids creating junk in the source directory.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1035
-- Commit Summary --
* Use temporary file for Swift test inputs
-- File Changes --
M
apis/openstack-swift/src/test/java/org/j
@zack-shoylev Please review.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1035#issuecomment-258931853
`diff -r oneandone/src/test/resources/shared*` confirms that these files are
identical.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/335#issuecomment-258985542
Clients use this during completeMultipartUpload.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1037
-- Commit Summary --
* Include part size in listMultipartUpload result
-- File Changes --
M blobstore/src/main/java/org/jclouds/
This causes integration test failures since `uploadMultipartPart` does not
correctly return `partSize`
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1037#issuecomment-259466971
I discovered a more serious issue in `RegionScopedSwiftBlobStore.downloadBlob`
which creates a temporary file with a relative path.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1035
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ public void downloadBlob(String container, String name,
> File destination, Execut
ListeningExecutorService listeningExecutor =
MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator(executor);
RandomAccessFile raf = null;
- File
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> @@ -121,7 +126,7 @@ public void uploadMultipartBlob() {
@Test(dependsOnMethods = "uploadMultipartBlob", singleThreaded = true)
public void downloadParallelBlob() throws IOException {
- final File downloadedFile = new File(BIG_FILE.getNa
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ public void downloadBlob(String container, String name,
> File destination, Execut
ListeningExecutorService listeningExecutor =
MoreExecutors.listeningDecorator(executor);
RandomAccessFile raf = null;
- File
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> @@ -121,7 +126,7 @@ public void uploadMultipartBlob() {
@Test(dependsOnMethods = "uploadMultipartBlob", singleThreaded = true)
public void downloadParallelBlob() throws IOException {
- final File downloadedFile = new File(BIG_FILE.getNa
Does google-cloud-storage need a similar fix?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/87#issuecomment-259763915
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +The complete list of fixed issues and improvements can be found
> [here](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12327379&styleName=Html&projectId=12314430).
+
+We have also improved [our CI system](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbee
👍
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/189#issuecomment-260554927
👍
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/88#issuecomment-262581547
andrewgaul requested changes on this pull request.
> @@ -138,6 +154,10 @@ public static void main(String[] args) throws
> IOException {
}
} finally {
+ // delete cointainer
+ if (blobStore.containerExists(containerName)) {
Should be OK to remove `con
andrewgaul requested changes on this pull request.
> @@ -51,6 +51,11 @@
google-compute-engine
${jclouds.version}
+
+ io.cloudsoft.jclouds.api
+ openstack-mitaka-nova
+ 1.9.3-cloudsoft.20160831
+
What is this for?
> // Create Container
-
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> // Create Container
- BlobStore blobStore = context.getBlobStore();
Location location = null;
Let's leave this as-is.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or v
andrewgaul approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-examples/pull/90#pullrequestreview-10201682
This raises the maximum multipart size from 195 GB to 4.77 TB.
Reference:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/general-availability-larger-block-blobs-in-azure-storage/
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1050
-- Commit
The old domain will no longer function after 2 Feb 2017. Reference:
https://help.backblaze.com/hc/en-us/articles/224959187-B2-Domain-Migration-Plan
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/339
-- Commit Summary --
* Update
I could not verify the original symptoms but the fix makes sense and passes
integration tests against AWS S3 and DreamObjects.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1052#issu
REST API version 2016-05-31 includes PublicAccess in List Containers
and Get Container Properties APIs.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1054
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-1228: Include PublicAccess in responses
-- File
@nacx Please review.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1055#issuecomment-275036651
Previously Android choked on this incomplete regex.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1055
-- Commit Summary --
* Correct regex in ExpandProperties
-- File Changes --
M core/src/main/java/org/jclouds/functions/Expand
Yeah jclouds does not work with Android for a few different reasons. I gave up
when Guice threw some codegen errors.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1055#issuecomment-
Should we wait until a jclouds talk is accepted before promoting ApacheCon?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/193#issuecomment-275605047
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1063
-- Commit Summary --
* Return lastModified and size when listing S3 parts
-- File Changes --
M apis/s3/src/main/java/org/jclouds/s3/S3Client.java (14)
A
apis/s3/src/main/j
Unfortunately this introduces a new method since we cannot change the
`listMultipartParts` return type.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1063#issuecomment-280544153
andrewgaul approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-site/pull/195#pullrequestreview-22667783
I amended your commit to use a more descriptive message and include the correct
JIRA link; please do this in the future. Also target the master branch and
request a branch instead of targeting 2.0.x. Pushed to master as
8649002e03314e3e4ebe436021e5db56c20500a5 and 2.0.x as
f76c09cbe6b31729f00
Closed #1069.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1069#event-982530939
Closed #1066.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1066#event-98264
Fixed whitespace, reworded commit message, and pushed to master as
fbf62437c7e776422288564c419dc037dbd72dfa and 2.0.x as
f210283cacf5a36e9d5cc303523f5730b95aae39. Thank you for your contribution
@geertvanheusden!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to th
👍 Please backport to 2.0.x since it may address failures such as:
https://travis-ci.org/andrewgaul/s3proxy/builds/207098979
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1067#issueco
Never mind, a coincidence of errors.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1067#issuecomment-283744385
This resolves issues using Java 9. Release notes:
https://github.com/google/auto/releases/tag/auto-value-1.4-rc2
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1074
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-1101: Upgrade to auto-value 1.4-rc2
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> + */
+@Beta
+public final class PartIdsFromHttpResponseFull extends
ParseSax.HandlerWithResult> {
+ private final StringBuilder currentText = new StringBuilder();
+
+ private final DateService dateParser;
+
+ private int partNumber;
+ private
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +import com.google.auto.value.AutoValue;
+import com.google.common.annotations.Beta;
+
+@AutoValue
+@Beta
+public abstract class ListMultipartUploadResponse {
+ public abstract int partNumber();
+ public abstract Date lastModified();
+ public ab
Pushed to master as ec932321bde5662d8ecbef7cf5428a6017b07dd0 and 2.0.x as
d2041667d770bcb865a7bfb451b5910dd9084d91.
--
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1063#issuecomment-28
Seems like everything has `provided`.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1074#issuecomment-284652611
Verified that labs, karaf, and cli compile with this commit.
--
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1074#issuecomment-284656827
Closed #487.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/487#event-1007818464
Is regional the same thing as standard? When I created a regional bucket in
the console it created as standard.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/commit/78cf479cf
This is straightforward to fix and test -- could you submit a pull request?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/commit/78cf479cf0b394b81191cb6fffe6a0bb526e52cd#commit
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
public Function apply(HttpRequest in) {
GeneratedHttpRequest request = GeneratedHttpRequest.class.cast(in);
Function transformer;
- Class> handler =
getSaxResponseParserClassOrNull(request.getInvocation()
+
I am not convinced that jclouds will direct much traffic from our site to
theirs. Do we have any analytics from the ApacheCon banner we added
previously? Or any traffic numbers for our home page?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly
@matmannion Can you add a test to `ContainerApiLiveTest`? If you haven't run
the integration tests before, you can do so via:
```
mvn integration-test -pl :openstack-swift -Plive
-Dtest.rackspace-cloudfiles-us.identity="${JCLOUDS_IDENTITY}"
-Dtest.rackspace-cloudfiles-us.credential="${JCLOUDS_
Ditto about integration tests, this time in `StaticLargeObjectApiLiveTest`.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1083#issuecomment-291394650
@matmannion Can you look at some of the earlier URL encoding commits to see if
there is a better solution? @timuralp fixed a lot of these issues in
[JCLOUDS-217](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-217).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to th
Squashed, reworded commit message, and pushed to master as
d41101df5932043c3a8614552f25ab91194595ba. I encountered conflicts when
cherry-picking to 2.0.x so please submit another pull request if you want to
backport this. Thank you for your contribution @matmannion!
--
You are receiving this
Closed #1083.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1083#event-1028296800
@matmannion Can you verify that the test does what you expect? `mvn
integration-test -pl :rackspace-cloudfiles-us -Plive
-Dtest=CloudFilesUSObjectApiLiveTest#testCreateAndListWithUnicodeCharacters`
succeeds with and without your fix.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to thi
Do you actually have an AWS China account? This is seprate from the regular
AWS accounts:
https://www.amazonaws.cn/en/about-aws/china/#AWS_(China)_Accounts
Unfortunately I lack a China account so I cannot test this.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/175
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-902: Google Cloud Storage signed URLs
-- File Changes --
A
google-cloud-storage/src/main/java/org/jclouds/googlecloudstorage/blobstor
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> @@ -29,5 +33,12 @@
protected void configure() {
bind(ConsistencyModel.class).toInstance(ConsistencyModel.EVENTUAL);
bind(BlobStore.class).to(GoogleCloudStorageBlobStore.class).in(Scopes.SINGLETON);
+
bind(BlobRequestSigner.cla
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +import com.google.inject.name.Named;
+
+public final class GoogleCloudStorageBlobRequestSigner implements
BlobRequestSigner {
+ private static final int DEFAULT_EXPIRY_SECONDS = 15 * 60;
+ private static final URI STORAGE_URL =
URI.create("http
👍
Outside the scope of this PR, we hoped to remove executors in
[JCLOUDS-153](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-153). Is this
still a goal?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/j
andrewgaul requested changes on this pull request.
Please address substantial comments and remove all stylistic changes. Also
investigate these failed tests:
```
CloudFilesUSBlobIntegrationLiveTest>BaseBlobIntegrationTest.deleteObjectNoContainer:525
» NullPointer
CloudFilesUSBlobIntegrat
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> return new
> PageSetImpl(ImmutableList. of(), null);
} else {
- containerCache.put(container, Optional.of(objects.getContainer()));
+ //containerCache.put(container, Optional.of(objects.getContainer()));
Why comment
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +* @param segments
+* ordered parts which will be concatenated upon download.
+* @param metadata
+* corresponds to {@link SwiftObject#getMetadata()}.
+* @param headers
+* Binds the map to headers,
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> @@ -123,6 +124,50 @@ public void uploadMultipartBlob() {
// The etag returned by Swift is not the md5 of the Blob uploaded
// It is the md5 of the concatenated segment md5s
}
+
+ @Test
+ public void uploadMultipartBlobDLO() {
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +
> assertEquals(object1s.getPayload().getContentMetadata().getContentLength(),
> Long.valueOf(1024 * 1024));
+ }
+
+ protected void deleteAllObjectsInContainerDLO(String regionId, final String
containerName) {
+ Uninterruptibles.slee
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> + assertReplaceManifest(regionId, defaultContainerName, defaultName);
+ }
+ }
+
+ protected void assertReplaceManifest(String regionId, String containerName,
String name) {
+ ObjectApi objectApi = getApi().getObjectApi(regionId,
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +*/
+ private String getSLOInfo(String container, String objectName) {
+ ObjectApi objectApi = api.getObjectApi(regionId, container);
+ Multimap objInfo =
objectApi.getWithoutBody(objectName).getHeaders();
+ if (objInfo.containsK
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +* @param prefix
+*
+*/
+ private void removeObjectsWithPrefix(String container, String prefix) {
+ String nextMarker = null;
+ ObjectApi objectApi = api.getObjectApi(regionId, container);
+ do {
+ org.jclouds.ope
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +*/
+ private void removeObjectsWithPrefix(String containerAndPrefix) {
+ String[] parts = splitContainerAndKey(containerAndPrefix);
+
+ String container = parts[0];
+ String prefix = parts[1];
+
+ removeObjectsWithPrefix(con
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
>return api.getStaticLargeObjectApi(regionId,
> mpu.containerName()).replaceManifest(mpu.blobName(),
builder.build(), mpu.blobMetadata().getUserMetadata(),
getContentMetadataForManifest(mpu.blobMetadata().getContentMetadata()));
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +* @param containerAndKey
+* @return array of size 2 with container and objectPrefix
+*/
+ private String[] splitContainerAndKey(String containerAndKey) {
+ String[] parts = containerAndKey.split("/", 2);
+ checkArgument(parts.
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS"
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> + assertReplaceManifest(regionId, defaultContainerName, defaultName);
+ }
+ }
+
+ protected void assertReplaceManifest(String regionId, String containerName,
String name) {
+ ObjectApi objectApi = getApi().getObjectApi(regionId,
> For DLO upload, etag will the md5 of the manifest and not the md5 of the
> concatenated etags.
> Thats the reason etag mismatch happens in ParallelLiveTest. So etag checking
> for DLO objects requires
> manifest to be constructed locally and compute its md5 and then compare with
> the etag fro
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +import org.jclouds.openstack.swift.v1.domain.SwiftObject;
+import org.jclouds.openstack.swift.v1.internal.BaseSwiftApiLiveTest;
+import org.jclouds.openstack.swift.v1.options.ListContainerOptions;
+import org.testng.annotations.AfterClass;
+import or
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS"
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +* @param containerAndKey
+* @return array of size 2 with container and objectPrefix
+*/
+ private String[] splitContainerAndKey(String containerAndKey) {
+ String[] parts = containerAndKey.split("/", 2);
+ checkArgument(parts.
@nacx @zack-shoylev Please review.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1093#issuecomment-299678471
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1093
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-458: GCS skeleton with authentication
* JCLOUDS-458: Added Default object access control
* JCLOUDS-458: Add BucketAccessControls
* JCLOUDS-458: A
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/pull/176
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-944: Promote Google Cloud Storage to core
-- File Changes --
D CONTRIBUTING.md (9)
M README.md (214)
D google-cloud-storage/RE
@nacx Please review modified `README.md`. Do we need to do anything else to
retire this repository, e.g., modify build scripts?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-google/
@ttulka Please add a unit test to `FilesystemStorageStrategyImplTest` which
exercises this behavior.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1094#issuecomment-299951771
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1095
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-1005: Backblaze B2 skeleton and bucket ops
* JCLOUDS-1005: Correct B2 package names
* JCLOUDS-1005: Remove unused Credentials
* JCLOUDS-1005: Bac
@nacx @zack-shoylev Please review.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1095#issuecomment-299960053
I dislike promoting a provider in a bugfix release but if others prefer this I
will do the work. It would be great to release a new version although I prefer
2.1.0.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://g
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> +http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, ei
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/388
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-1272: Promote B2 to core
-- File Changes --
D b2/pom.xml (132)
D b2/src/main/java/org/jclouds/b2/B2Api.java (40)
D b2/src/main/java/o
@nacx @zack-shoylev Please review.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/388#issuecomment-32351
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/101
-- Commit Summary --
* JCLOUDS-944: JCLOUDS-1272: Update B2 and GCS deps
-- File Changes --
M feature-labs/src/main/feature/feature.xml (17)
M feature/src/main/feature
@nacx @neykov Please review.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/101#issuecomment-300025660
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> @@ -549,7 +551,7 @@ limitations under the License.
jclouds-blobstore
jclouds-api-oauth
mvn:org.apache.jclouds.common/googlecloud/${jclouds.version}
-
mvn:org.apache.jclouds.labs/google-cloud-storage/${jclouds.version
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> @@ -18,11 +18,6 @@ limitations under the License.
http://karaf.apache.org/xmlns/features/v1.0.0";>
mvn:org.apache.jclouds.karaf/jclouds-karaf/${jclouds.version}/xml/features
-
-jclouds-b2
-jclouds-google-cloud-storage
-
> Tests passed in the last build, although the promoted providers should be
> moved to the right test class.
Done.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/101#issuecomme
> LGTM. Thanks! Just one minor (to be fixed when merging, no need for another
> review): remove the "labs" text from the moved test methods.
Done.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/j
@ttulka I do not understand this pull request -- it succeeds on Linux without
the fix in #1094. Do you test on Windows? If so maybe we can make this fail
by adding a trailing forward slash, `/`?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly
@ttulka I do not understand your test -- it succeeds on Linux without the fix.
Do you test on Windows? If so maybe we can make this fail on Linux as well by
adding a trailing forward slash, `/`?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or
Your test should fail before your change and succeed after, yet it succeeds
before and after for me.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1094#issuecomment-300397608
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> @@ -684,6 +685,16 @@ public void testPutIncorrectContentLength() throws
> Exception {
// expected
}
}
+
+ @Test
+ public void testDeletingInvalidPathFileEndsNormally() {
+ String invalidPathBlobKey = "Ahttps://github.
andrewgaul commented on this pull request.
> jclouds
+jclouds-services
Did you mix in some unrelated fix here?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull
Squashed, removed unneeded whitespace, propagated exception cause, and pushed
to master as 6452960c72a5f8247acae12481b94cdf9d8e4218 and 2.0.x as
9bf7c5da5acdfeac1e9298964cb591a142b48afd. Thank you for your contribution
@ttulka!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thre
Closed #1094.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/1094#event-1075942944
@archupsg03 The more I think about this, let's work on the portable abstraction
code in a separate pull request. Please focus this on only the provider, i.e.,
remove `RegionScopedSwiftBlobStore` changes and only add
`RegionScopedSwiftBlobStore`.
--
You are receiving this because you are subsc
Pushed to master as a299a6c1fdfff5669d2f9bc830e6b2df96bec1a8 and 2.0.x as
f7cad22d937025e46110c93d93a8a7cb5ea630c3. Thank you for your contribution
@ui4j!
--
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/
601 - 700 of 4089 matches
Mail list logo
