[notmuch] [PATCH v2] notmuch.el: Make notmuch-show buffer name first subject, instead of thread-id

2010-02-12 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
Change the buffer name to a uniquified subject of the thread (i.e. the subject of the first message in the thread) instead of the thread-id. This is more meaningful to the user, and will make it easier to scroll through numerous open buffers. Note that this patch adds an optionsal `buffer-name'

[notmuch] [PATCH] Reintroduce HTML inlining, with a much needed optimization

2010-02-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:18:38 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:55:21 -0800, Alexander Botero-Lowry at gmail.com> wrote: > > Now instead of requiring every single message be parsed, we now check > > the Content-type in the parsed headers and only do HTML inlining if it's > >

[notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] notmuch.el: add a submap (on "z" for "ztash") to stash things.

2010-02-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:01:08 -0400, david at tethera.net wrote: > From: David Bremner > > Provide key bindings for stuffing various RFC822 header fields and other > metadata > into the emacs kill-ring as text. The bindings are as follows: > > z F notmuch-show-stash-filename > z T

[notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:42:08 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > Interesting. My only real concern at this point is that some of the new files > have a copyright header identifying Junio as the copyright holder, but > no license information. Meanwhile, the implicit license of git (GPLv2 > only) is

[notmuch] [RFC] improved display of message/rfc822 parts

2010-02-12 Thread David Edmondson
. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-show-Make-message-rfc822-parts-explicit-in-show-outp.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 1743 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100212/1d2cd466/attachment.pa

[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch.el: Make notmuch-show buffer name first subject, instead of thread-id

2010-02-12 Thread Jameson Rollins
L: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100212/bdcad1af/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] notmuch reply template

2010-02-12 Thread martin f krafft
y. spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100212/ed87657b/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-12 Thread Carl Worth
er that. -Carl -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100212/bb49325f/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] Backport of Xapian term update optimisation

2010-02-12 Thread David Edmondson
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 23:23:56 +, Olly Betts wrote: > If I get a lot of positive feedback on the snapshot version, that'll encourage > me to push ahead with it. I've also announced it on the sup mailing list (as > they have similar issues with adding tags) and will on the Xapian list later >

Re: [notmuch] Backport of Xapian term update optimisation

2010-02-12 Thread David Edmondson
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 23:23:56 +, Olly Betts o...@survex.com wrote: If I get a lot of positive feedback on the snapshot version, that'll encourage me to push ahead with it. I've also announced it on the sup mailing list (as they have similar issues with adding tags) and will on the Xapian

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:42:08 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Interesting. My only real concern at this point is that some of the new files have a copyright header identifying Junio as the copyright holder, but no license information. Meanwhile, the implicit license of git (GPLv2

[notmuch] [RFC] improved display of message/rfc822 parts

2010-02-12 Thread David Edmondson
I seem to get a lot of forwarded message/rfc822 parts and the default formatting (which is to inline the contents of the included message) is very confusing. Attached is a patch which attempts to improve this. Given that I'm new to notmuch hacking, any comments would be appreciated. From

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 2/2] notmuch.el: add a submap (on z for ztash) to stash things.

2010-02-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:01:08 -0400, da...@tethera.net wrote: From: David Bremner brem...@unb.ca Provide key bindings for stuffing various RFC822 header fields and other metadata into the emacs kill-ring as text. The bindings are as follows: z F notmuch-show-stash-filename z T

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Reintroduce HTML inlining, with a much needed optimization

2010-02-12 Thread Michal Sojka
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:18:38 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 17:55:21 -0800, Alexander Botero-Lowry alex.boterolo...@gmail.com wrote: Now instead of requiring every single message be parsed, we now check the Content-type in the parsed headers and only do HTML

Re: [notmuch] A functional (but rudimentary) test suite for notmuch

2010-02-12 Thread Carl Worth
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:47:56 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: I'm not lawyer, but I'd say it should be no problem to use GPLv2 test suite to test your GPLv3 application. You are not linking them together. Right. We could do that. But we'd have to be careful to document things

[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch.el: Make notmuch-show buffer name first subject, instead of thread-id

2010-02-12 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
Change the buffer name to the subject of the thread instead of the thread-id. This is more meaningful to the user, and will make it easier to scroll through numerous open buffers. Note that this patch adds a required `buffer-name' argument to notmuch-show. Signed-off-by: Jesse Rosenthal

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch.el: Make notmuch-show buffer name first subject, instead of thread-id

2010-02-12 Thread Jameson Rollins
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:10:41 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote: Change the buffer name to the subject of the thread instead of the thread-id. This is more meaningful to the user, and will make it easier to scroll through numerous open buffers. Wow, what a great idea. I was

[notmuch] [PATCH v2] notmuch.el: Make notmuch-show buffer name first subject, instead of thread-id

2010-02-12 Thread Jesse Rosenthal
Change the buffer name to a uniquified subject of the thread (i.e. the subject of the first message in the thread) instead of the thread-id. This is more meaningful to the user, and will make it easier to scroll through numerous open buffers. Note that this patch adds an optionsal `buffer-name'