On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:58:38PM -0700, sebastian at sspaeth.de wrote:
> > Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
> > resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
>
> Is this patch preferable over the one I sent some time ago in
> id:127288
Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 22 ++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el b/emacs/notmu
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:58:38PM -0700, sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
> > Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
> > resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
>
> Is this patch preferable over the one I sent some time ago in
> id:127288257
> Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
> resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
Is this patch preferable over the one I sent some time ago in
id:1272882573-9864-1-git-send-email-sebast...@sspaeth.de ?
My patch makes notmuch-hello a m
> Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
> resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
Is this patch preferable over the one I sent some time ago in
id:1272882573-9864-1-git-send-email-Sebastian at SSpaeth.de ?
My patch makes notmuch-hello
Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 22 ++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el b/emacs/notmu
