The db_files and db_subdirs are unnecessary for unchanged directories.
maildir with 1 e-mails:
old version:
$ time ./notmuch new
No new mail.
real0m0.053s
user0m0.028s
sys 0m0.026s
new version:
$ time ./notmuch new
No new
: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/66dd73ea/attachment.pgp>
RL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/bef43091/attachment.pgp>
+signed).
d
tl;dr: yesterdays weirdness was not the fault of J. Rollins.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 315 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attac
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/074cd771/attachment.pgp>
ame: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1030 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/344de8a8/attachment-0001.pgp>
misbehaving mails.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/e63c87db/attachment.pgp>
with?
No.
> do you have a suggestion for how you think it should behave
> differently?
I think my suggestion was already made: short form.
m
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/d3180abd/attachment.pgp>
ot available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/dbef16ec/attachment.pgp>
: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/a14fe560/attachment.pgp>
://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/985058d7/attachment.pgp>
35 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/ce9426d4/attachment.pgp>
g/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110204/92235fa5/attachment-0001.pgp>
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
On 02/03/2011 11:25 AM, micah anderson wrote:
1. I personally think notmuch-show-process-pgpmime should default to
true
note that with it set to false, you can still M-RET (instead of RET) on
an item
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Please test and provide feedback. I would really like to see this
series merged into the mainline for the next release, if at all
possible.
I reported some pretty weird experiences yesterday on IRC with
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:24:38 -0400, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote:
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called crypto to my notmuch
repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:04:23 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
I just love seeing all those yellow signatures. It reminds me to meet
you all in real life to verify your keys :-).
Thanks for implementing this, the whole lot of you. It works really
well.
Yes! I'm really
On 02/04/2011 11:59 AM, micah anderson wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
when you say encrypted by do you mean encrypted to? do you have
access to the corresponding secret key?
If I open a message that was sent to me and was
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:09:48 +, Darren McGuicken
mailing-notm...@fernseed.info wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:02:41 -0800, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Can we pass the decrypted text to message mode on a reply?
Yeah, some folks pointed this out on #notmuch this
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:12:27 -0400, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote:
I reported some pretty weird experiences yesterday on IRC with replies
not working. It turns out they were caused by having old versions of
xapian installed in /usr/local (which I think might have caused some
mixup with
i tried running
emacs -Q -f notmuch
and replying to a message.
Since i didn't have my emacs config, it wanted to create the default
sent folder in ~/mail/sent
if i told it no, don't create it when prompted (during the setup of
the reply message) then the body of the replied-to message doesn't
21 matches
Mail list logo
