h
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110506/9d463279/attachment.pgp>
On May 06, 2011 at 07:56 PM -0400, James Vasile wrote:
>Thanks for pulling this together.
>
>I sent two patches to the list on March 16. They were a bug fix to
>
>allow notmuch to correctly handle some poorly formatted email. Nobody
>ever replied, but I'd like to see the bug fixed nonetheless,
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110506/3529d596/attachment.pgp>
Thanks for pulling this together.
I sent two patches to the list on March 16. They were a bug fix to
allow notmuch to correctly handle some poorly formatted email. Nobody
ever replied, but I'd like to see the bug fixed nonetheless, as it
results in unreadable mail. Since I've actually seen
Perhaps text summary output should *always* do this. The text summary
format is meant half for user consumption and half for emacs
consumption and allowing newlines that don't indicate the end of a
summary line seems bad for *both* use cases.
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Florian Friesdorf
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110506/c644e96d/attachment.pgp>
not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110506/ca25f918/attachment.pgp>
org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110506/0f516cc3/attachment.pgp>
ble
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110506/0e983010/attachment.pgp>
-
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110506/2f846e24/attachment.pgp>
orian Friesdorf
GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083
Jabber/XMPP: flo at chaoflow.net
IRC: chaoflow on freenode,ircnet,blafasel,OFTC
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20110506/5117fc95/attachment.pgp>
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:04:13 +0200, Florian Friesdorf
wrote:
>
> thank you all for your answers!
I second that and thanks to your performance page, I finally switched to
chert format database. That's day and night !
Thank you !
/Xavier
Hi Jamie,
any chance of getting this patch into 0.6?
It would enable me to run the tests for the nixos package without
patching.
You could pull it from:
git://github.com/chaoflow/notmuch.git
branch: for-review/test-fixes
commit: d8842075b1ff6f008e60aced5f4e0b4d7ac79515
regards
On Mon, 18
On Fri, 06 May 2011 11:09:19 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote:
any chance of getting this patch into 0.6?
Hi, Florian. Yes, I have included this patch in the
release-candidate/0.6 branch.
jamie.
pgpkckcJzTQkq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi, folks. As some of you already know, I am trying to put together a
release candidate for a 0.6 release that we can present to cworth for
approval. This branch can be found in my public notmuch repository in
the release-candidate/0.6 branch:
git remote add jrollins
Hi, Filipe. I notice that you have been submitting a lot of patches for
vim support. As you may have seen, I'm trying to put together a release
candidate for notmuch 0.6. Since I know nothing about vim, would you be
willing to prepare a patch set that includes all of the patches to vim
support
On Fri, 06 May 2011 12:47:35 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Fri, 06 May 2011 11:09:19 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net
wrote:
any chance of getting this patch into 0.6?
Hi, Florian. Yes, I have included this patch in the
release-candidate/0.6
On Fri, 06 May 2011 12:46:34 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I might try to add a couple of more things before declaring the
candidate release-ready, but this is more-or-less it. Please start
using this branch in production as much as possible, so that we can
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:41:39 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote:
My first patch send to the list, not sure whether done properly.
Just fine, Florian. Thanks for the contribution!
One small thing you might do differently in the future is to tweak the
email message to read exactly
On Fri, 06 May 2011 14:06:22 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
(..)
thx for all the suggestions - mail marked and will reread before the
next patch.
--
Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net
GPG FPR: 7A13 5EEE 1421 9FC2 108D BAAF 38F8 99A3 0C45 F083
Jabber/XMPP: f...@chaoflow.net
IRC:
In the release-candidate/0.6, the emacs UI is still not able to handle
messages where control characters are contained in the Subject: or
Author: fields.
As suggested by Pieter Prat, I turned Andreas Amann's patch into a
separate format.
The patch works and is very useful for me.
Is the general
Hi Carl,
On Fri, 06 May 2011 14:06:22 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:41:39 +0200, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net
wrote:
My first patch send to the list, not sure whether done properly.
Just fine, Florian. Thanks for the contribution!
One small
On Fri, 6 May 2011 19:55:26 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Perhaps text summary output should *always* do this. The text summary
format is meant half for user consumption and half for emacs
consumption and allowing newlines that don't indicate the end of a
summary line seems
On Fri, 6 May 2011 19:55:26 -0400, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Perhaps text summary output should *always* do this. The text summary
format is meant half for user consumption and half for emacs
consumption and allowing newlines that don't indicate the end of a
summary line seems
24 matches
Mail list logo
