Don't they need to be in the index in order to match the ignore condition,
which then allows them to be excluded from usual activities?
What's the actual thing you're hoping to achieve by not having those
ignored messages be in the index?
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:33 AM David Bremner wrote:
>
I have this in my .emacs:
(setq notmuch-multipart/alternative-discouraged '("text/plain" "text/html"))
In that order, it discourages text/plain in favor of text/html, but also
ends up discouraging text/html if there are other options. In particular,
if there's a text/calendar item, I generally
Nonetheess, if you can tell from the index that a given message contains
the words "hotel" "wine" "wife" "secret" and "rendezvous", you can infer a
*lot* about the contents of encrypted contents of the message.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins <
jrollins at
Nonetheess, if you can tell from the index that a given message contains
the words hotel wine wife secret and rendezvous, you can infer a
*lot* about the contents of encrypted contents of the message.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On
Off the top of my head, you could have an encrypted index too, which you
can only search while able to decrypt. Certainly another level of
complexity.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:10 AM, David Bremner wrote:
> john.wyzer at gmx.de writes:
>
> > Would it be possible to add the configurable option
Off the top of my head, you could have an encrypted index too, which you
can only search while able to decrypt. Certainly another level of
complexity.
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:10 AM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
john.wy...@gmx.de writes:
Would it be possible to add the
Adam
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> hi notmuch folks--
>
> i'd like to be able to forward several messages from a given thread (up
> to and including the whole thread) to someone else. I use
> notmuch-emacs.
>
> I don't think it's possible to do this at the
Adam
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net
wrote:
hi notmuch folks--
i'd like to be able to forward several messages from a given thread (up
to and including the whole thread) to someone else. I use
notmuch-emacs.
I don't think it's possible to do
, Apr 24, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jeremy Nickurak
not-m...@trk.nickurak.cawrote:
Adam
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
hi notmuch folks--
i'd like to be able to forward several messages from a given thread (up
to and including the whole thread
Doing this on a directory basis is a non-starter for me. The reason that
Notmuch and gmail are a natural fit is that they both operate on
labels/tags instead of folders.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
As far as syncing flags to notmuch, it sounds like this would be easy to
achieve with an independent 3rd tool, or even a small script:
1) Find files in the maildir modified since the last check
2) Read their keywords headers
3) Update the notmuch tags accordingnly.
The other direction sounds like
As far as syncing flags to notmuch, it sounds like this would be easy to
achieve with an independent 3rd tool, or even a small script:
1) Find files in the maildir modified since the last check
2) Read their keywords headers
3) Update the notmuch tags accordingnly.
The other direction sounds like
Doing this on a directory basis is a non-starter for me. The reason that
Notmuch and gmail are a natural fit is that they both operate on
labels/tags instead of folders.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Mark Walters
wrote:
>
> Some messages are sent as multipart/alternative but the alternatives
> contain different information. This allows the user to cycle which
> part to view. By default this is bound to 'W'.
I've started using this, and quite like it. Only
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
Some messages are sent as multipart/alternative but the alternatives
contain different information. This allows the user to cycle which
part to view. By default this is bound to 'W'.
I've started using this, and
Would it be better to include sorting options in the query string?
Then it could just be stored in the saved search, and used outside
saved searches.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
> These (fairly unpolished) patches add support for defining the sort order
> for each saved
Would it be better to include sorting options in the query string?
Then it could just be stored in the saved search, and used outside
saved searches.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
These (fairly unpolished) patches add support for defining the sort order
for
(Apologies for the double-post... got an email asking me to confirm my
address, which I thought meant I posted from the wrong address. Re-posted,
recieved another confirmation email. Confirmed one, and both got through.
Weird.)
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Jeremy Nickurak
wrote:
> M
More relevant:
https://developers.google.com/google-apps/gmail/imap_extensions
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote:
> You may want to have a look to the google mail API [1]
>
> [1]: https://developers.google.com/google-apps/email-settings/
>
More relevant:
https://developers.google.com/google-apps/gmail/imap_extensions
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote:
> You may want to have a look to the google mail API [1]
>
> [1]: https://developers.google.com/google-apps/email-settings/
>
More relevant:
https://developers.google.com/google-apps/gmail/imap_extensions
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Christophe-Marie Duquesne c...@chmd.frwrote:
You may want to have a look to the google mail API [1]
[1]: https://developers.google.com/google-apps/email-settings/
More relevant:
https://developers.google.com/google-apps/gmail/imap_extensions
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:32 AM, Christophe-Marie Duquesne c...@chmd.frwrote:
You may want to have a look to the google mail API [1]
[1]: https://developers.google.com/google-apps/email-settings/
Gmail doesn't have folders, of course, it has labels, which are
approximately equivalent to notmuch tags. The key difference being that a
message can only be in one folder, but it can have multiple tags/labels.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Damien Cassou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a Gmail user and
Gmail doesn't have folders, of course, it has labels, which are
approximately equivalent to notmuch tags. The key difference being that a
message can only be in one folder, but it can have multiple tags/labels.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Damien Cassou damien.cas...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> I would like to install notmuch with emacs-snapshot on ubuntu, but it does
> not seem to be in the
> list of alternatives to emacs. I cmpiled the deb packages from source.
> I have one question and one suggestion:
>
> 1) what do I have to
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to install notmuch with emacs-snapshot on ubuntu, but it does
not seem to be in the
list of alternatives to emacs. I cmpiled the deb packages from source.
I have one question and one suggestion:
1) what
Works-for-me, precisely as requested, thanks :)
Works-for-me, precisely as requested, thanks :)
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
No idea. I expect they don't use mailcap though... any KDE users here?
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:54, David Belohrad wrote:
> Does kde use the same database as gnome?
>
> Jeremy Nickurak napsal/a:
>
>>On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:19, Jameson Graef Rollins
>> wrote:
&
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:19, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Also, when the cursor is on the button you can hit 'o' to open with
> default mailcap app, 's' to save, and 'v' to view with a specified app.
Is there any way of just getting it to ignore mailcap, and send
everything to xdg-open? It's
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:19, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Also, when the cursor is on the button you can hit 'o' to open with
default mailcap app, 's' to save, and 'v' to view with a specified app.
Is there any way of just getting it to ignore mailcap, and send
No idea. I expect they don't use mailcap though... any KDE users here?
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:54, David Belohrad da...@belohrad.ch wrote:
Does kde use the same database as gnome?
Jeremy Nickurak not-m...@trk.nickurak.canapsal/a:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:19, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> Any other suggestions or ideas?
What about representing the contents from both message in one apparent message?
- Aggregate the headers together, perhaps?
- Where headers disagree, display both
- If the bodies disagree, display both.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net
wrote:
Any other suggestions or ideas?
What about representing the contents from both message in one apparent message?
- Aggregate the headers together, perhaps?
- Where headers disagree, display both
- If the bodies
What you'll probably find is that, of the messages in those threads,
some match tag:inbox, and some match tag:unread, but none match both.
Notmuch's search returns threads that have matching messages, not
matching threads.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 23:37, Bhaskara Marthi wrote:
> Either I have the
What you'll probably find is that, of the messages in those threads,
some match tag:inbox, and some match tag:unread, but none match both.
Notmuch's search returns threads that have matching messages, not
matching threads.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 23:37, Bhaskara Marthi bhask...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it safe to assume that any reasonable seperator (comma, space,
semicolon, plus or minus sign, anything) won't show up in a tag name?
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 21:41, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Before the change, "+" and "-" tagging operations in notmuch-search
> and notmuch-show views accepted
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:41, Austin Clements wrote:
> As much as I would like this, many terminals don't visually
> distinguish between the default face and the default face in bold.
I've taken a shot at this under xterm, gnome-terminal, and a basic
linux VT. I figure that if something is
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:41, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
As much as I would like this, many terminals don't visually
distinguish between the default face and the default face in bold.
I've taken a shot at this under xterm, gnome-terminal, and a basic
linux VT. I figure that if
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:28, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth David Edmondson on Jan 16 at ?9:12 am:
>> Having "deleted" and "spam" as default settings in the configuration
>> file might be more reasonable.
>
> Sorry, I'm confused. ?Are you saying deleted;spam should or should not
> be the
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:28, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth David Edmondson on Jan 16 at 9:12 am:
Having deleted and spam as default settings in the configuration
file might be more reasonable.
Sorry, I'm confused. Are you saying deleted;spam should or should not
be the
FWIW, here's the patch I ended up using to play with this:
diff --git a/mutt_notmuch.c b/mutt_notmuch.c
index 2f21407..a07b1ba 100644
--- a/mutt_notmuch.c
+++ b/mutt_notmuch.c
@@ -636,11 +636,15 @@ char *nm_uri_from_query(CONTEXT *ctx, char *buf,
size_t bufsz)
static notmuch_message_t
FWIW, here's the patch I ended up using to play with this:
diff --git a/mutt_notmuch.c b/mutt_notmuch.c
index 2f21407..a07b1ba 100644
--- a/mutt_notmuch.c
+++ b/mutt_notmuch.c
@@ -636,11 +636,15 @@ char *nm_uri_from_query(CONTEXT *ctx, char *buf,
size_t bufsz)
?static notmuch_message_t
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 16:32, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> That's a good point. ?I think that maybe people are wanting to protect
> against the accidental reply to all when you only mean to reply to the
> sender.
Certainly a worthy cause. All I'm saying is I make the mistake in the
other
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 14:48, Jani Nikula wrote:
> It seemed to me that most people wanted this, and nobody spoke for keeping
> the old binding now that we have reply-to-sender. This as a separate patch
> so it's easy to drop if needed.
FWIW, I generally prefer reply-all as the default. In my
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 14:48, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
It seemed to me that most people wanted this, and nobody spoke for keeping
the old binding now that we have reply-to-sender. This as a separate patch
so it's easy to drop if needed.
FWIW, I generally prefer reply-all as the
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 16:32, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
That's a good point. I think that maybe people are wanting to protect
against the accidental reply to all when you only mean to reply to the
sender.
Certainly a worthy cause. All I'm saying is I make the
47 matches
Mail list logo
