On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
>boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
>add a tag, and then "a". If I forget about +, then my mail is
>impossible to find.
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Darren McGuicken wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:05:58 +0100, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > I agree with you in that in many cases tags can be replaced by saved
> > searches. Last time I did it, i.e. used saved searches to distinguish
> > messages from different mailing lists,
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> > (define-key notmuch-search-mode-map "d"
> > (lambda ()
> > "delete thread and advance"
> > (interactive)
> > (notmuch-search-add-tag "deleted")
> > (forward-line)))
> ...
>
> This only works if you've already
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:34:38 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > But the space bar removes the unread tag, so I do not see how it
> > helps... By default, hitting the space bar throughout a thread would
> > remove every tag from the
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Darren McGuicken wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:05:58 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
I agree with you in that in many cases tags can be replaced by saved
searches. Last time I did it, i.e. used saved searches to distinguish
messages from different mailing
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
(define-key notmuch-search-mode-map d
(lambda ()
delete thread and advance
(interactive)
(notmuch-search-add-tag deleted)
(forward-line)))
...
This only works if you've already
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:13:26 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:01:48 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > Now when you consistently label all your mails, you just don't want to
> > have unclassified mails. That is what we meant by "mail you can't find".
>
> It sounds like
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> But the space bar removes the unread tag, so I do not see how it
> helps... By default, hitting the space bar throughout a thread would
> remove every tag from the thread, so you keep asking "where was the mail
> in my inbox that I
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> This only works if you've already loaded notmuch, or you get error
> messages about notmuch-search-mode-map not being known. How do you deal
> with that or does it simply work for you?
DOH, nothing that a (require 'notmuch) couldn't
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:33:33 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I agree that the function currently bound to space bar is annoying. I
> am actually in the middle of preparing a patch to fix this. I think
> that space should just scroll through the open messages. I don't want
> it to archive
> I think you guys may have a misunderstanding about how notmuch indexes
> mail. Notmuch indexes multiple headers (To, From, Subject, Date) and
> the *entire* body of the message. That's kind of the whole point. In
> other words, messages don't have to have tags in order to be found.
[...]
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> This only works if you've already loaded notmuch, or you get error
> messages about notmuch-search-mode-map not being known. How do you deal
> with that or does it simply work for you?
I have:
(require 'notmuch)
in my config file
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:01:48 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> Now when you consistently label all your mails, you just don't want to
> have unclassified mails. That is what we meant by "mail you can't find".
It sounds like this would just as easily be accomplished with a way to
search for all
I think you guys may have a misunderstanding about how notmuch indexes
mail. Notmuch indexes multiple headers (To, From, Subject, Date) and
the *entire* body of the message. That's kind of the whole point. In
other words, messages don't have to have tags in order to be found.
[...]
Not
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:01:48 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
Now when you consistently label all your mails, you just don't want to
have unclassified mails. That is what we meant by mail you can't find.
It sounds like this would just as easily be accomplished with a way to
search
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:33:33 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
I agree that the function currently bound to space bar is annoying. I
am actually in the middle of preparing a patch to fix this. I think
that space should just scroll through the open messages. I don't want
it to archive anything,
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
This only works if you've already loaded notmuch, or you get error
messages about notmuch-search-mode-map not being known. How do you deal
with that or does it simply work for you?
I have:
(require 'notmuch)
in
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:13:26 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:01:48 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
Now when you consistently label all your mails, you just don't want to
have unclassified mails. That is what we meant by mail you
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
This only works if you've already loaded notmuch, or you get error
messages about notmuch-search-mode-map not being known. How do you deal
with that or does it simply work for you?
DOH, nothing that a (require 'notmuch) couldn't fix.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
But the space bar removes the unread tag, so I do not see how it
helps... By default, hitting the space bar throughout a thread would
remove every tag from the thread, so you keep asking where was the mail
in my inbox
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
- Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: + to
add a tag, and then a. If I forget about +, then my mail is
impossible to
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:34:38 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
But the space bar removes the unread tag, so I do not see how it
helps... By default, hitting the space bar throughout a thread would
On Friday 12 November 2010 16:23:58 Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
>boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
>add a tag, and then "a". If I forget about +, then my mail is
>impossible to find.
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:43:38 +0100, C?dric Cabessa wrote:
> On Friday 12 November 2010 16:23:58 Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
> >boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
> >add a tag, and then
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 07:05:58 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I agree with you in that in many cases tags can be replaced by saved
> searches. Last time I did it, i.e. used saved searches to distinguish
> messages from different mailing lists, the result was that it took
> very long time (something
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Darren McGuicken wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > Here is first a patch that copes with this last point. Whenever you
> > want to archive a thread, it finds whether you forgot to add a custom
> > "user" tag to a message, and if so asks
On Friday 12 November 2010 16:23:58 Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
- Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: + to
add a tag, and then a. If I forget about +, then my mail is
impossible to find.
I feel
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:43:38 +0100, Cédric Cabessa c...@ryick.net wrote:
On Friday 12 November 2010 16:23:58 Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
- Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: + to
add a tag, and
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:05:23 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
> >boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
> >add a tag, and
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:48:12 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> It is just a way to ensure that all your mails are properly filed, and
> file them quickly.
We should just add a hook that you can use, then.
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
Hi, Jamie.
>
> > - I often find myself hitting the spacebar too much, which ends up with
> >some of my new messages being removed from all of their tags, which
> >make them very difficult to find. I don't think the spacebar should
> >remove the inbox tag at all. It should only
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:39:37 +, Darren McGuicken wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > Here is first a patch that copes with this last point. Whenever you
> > want to archive a thread, it finds whether you forgot to add a custom
> > "user" tag to a
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> - Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
>boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: "+" to
>add a tag, and then "a". If I forget about +, then my mail is
>impossible to find.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> I prefer to add tags, for the following reasons:
It sounds like we do much the same things with our mail except that your
approach is quite disciplined and mine quite lazy :-)
> - If I want to search through a mailing list, I don't
Hi,
I think that there are several irritating nitpicks when using notmuch in
a typical mail workflow.
I don't know how other people process their email. I for myself use the
following method:
1. The script I use to fetch new mails tries to add tags if it can. For
instance, all new mails
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> Here is first a patch that copes with this last point. Whenever you
> want to archive a thread, it finds whether you forgot to add a custom
> "user" tag to a message, and if so asks you for a tag to add before
> archiving. That way, I
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> The emacs interface to notmuch gets in my way in at least several
> manners:
Hi, Matthieu. Here are some of the things I've done to deal with
similar issues:
> - I often find myself hitting the spacebar too much, which ends up with
Hi,
I think that there are several irritating nitpicks when using notmuch in
a typical mail workflow.
I don't know how other people process their email. I for myself use the
following method:
1. The script I use to fetch new mails tries to add tags if it can. For
instance, all new mails
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
Here is first a patch that copes with this last point. Whenever you
want to archive a thread, it finds whether you forgot to add a custom
user tag to a message, and if so asks you for a tag to add before
archiving. That
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:39:37 +, Darren McGuicken
mailing-notm...@fernseed.info wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
Here is first a patch that copes with this last point. Whenever you
want to archive a thread, it finds whether you forgot to
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
I prefer to add tags, for the following reasons:
It sounds like we do much the same things with our mail except that your
approach is quite disciplined and mine quite lazy :-)
- If I want to search through a mailing
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
- Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: + to
add a tag, and then a. If I forget about +, then my mail is
impossible to
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:05:23 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
- Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: + to
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:48:12 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
It is just a way to ensure that all your mails are properly filed, and
file them quickly.
We should just add a hook that you can use, then.
dme.
--
David Edmondson, http://dme.org
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Darren McGuicken wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
Here is first a patch that copes with this last point. Whenever you
want to archive a thread, it finds whether you forgot to add a custom
user tag to a message, and if so
45 matches
Mail list logo
