On 2010-05-14, Nelson Elhage wrote:
> Ah, I failed to properly search the mail archives before sending
> this.
No problem, I admit that my subject title does not obviously point out
that it creates a proper keymap ;-).
> Your patch looks preferable with one exception: I think that
> making
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:58:38PM -0700, sebastian at sspaeth.de wrote:
> > Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
> > resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
>
> Is this patch preferable over the one I sent some time ago in
>
On 2010-05-14, Nelson Elhage wrote:
Ah, I failed to properly search the mail archives before sending
this.
No problem, I admit that my subject title does not obviously point out
that it creates a proper keymap ;-).
Your patch looks preferable with one exception: I think that
making
Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 22 ++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
> Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
> resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
Is this patch preferable over the one I sent some time ago in
id:1272882573-9864-1-git-send-email-Sebastian at SSpaeth.de ?
My patch makes notmuch-hello
Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
---
emacs/notmuch-hello.el | 22 ++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-hello.el
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:58:38PM -0700, sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
Previously, we were adding our bindings directly to `widget-keymap',
resulting in them being shared by anything else that used that keymap.
Is this patch preferable over the one I sent some time ago in
