On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:26:02 -0500, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:21:08 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
So, would I be right to assume MML tags in signatures are never
evaluated to begin with? Otherwise, there would still be a security
hole, no?
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:43:09 -0500, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
- (message-goto-body))
+ (message-goto-body)
+ (mml-quote-region (point) (mark)))
Obviously good. It would be nice to have a comment about why it's `mark'
and not `point-max'. In fact, it would be good to have a
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:43:09 -0500, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
Emacs message-mode uses certain text strings to indicate how to attach
files to outgoing mail. If these are present in the text of an email,
and a user is tricked into replying to the message, the user’s files
could be
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:43:09 -0500, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
Emacs message-mode uses certain text strings to indicate how to attach
files to outgoing mail. If these are present in the text of an email,
and a user is tricked into replying to the message, the user’s files
could be
Quoth Pieter Praet on Jan 19 at 11:23 pm:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:43:09 -0500, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
Emacs message-mode uses certain text strings to indicate how to attach
files to outgoing mail. If these are present in the text of an email,
and a user is tricked into
LGTM and I think it could go in despite my two comments below.
Quoth Aaron Ecay on Jan 19 at 1:43 pm:
Emacs message-mode uses certain text strings to indicate how to attach
files to outgoing mail. If these are present in the text of an email,
and a user is tricked into replying to the
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:46:31 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
### OT:
For some reason, `mml-quote-region' explicitly re-quotes
already quoted MML tags:
#!*/?\\(multipart\\|part\\|external\\|mml\\)
Why is that ?
Probably so the transformation is invertible, though
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:48:42 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Did you consider using point-max instead of mark? IIRC, that mark was
very recently introduced which, perhaps irrationally, makes it seem
less future-proof to me.
Well, if the patch goes in and someone changes the
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:52:23 -0500, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:46:31 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
### OT:
For some reason, `mml-quote-region' explicitly re-quotes
already quoted MML tags:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:56:16 -0500, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:48:42 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Did you consider using point-max instead of mark? IIRC, that mark was
very recently introduced which, perhaps irrationally, makes it seem
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:21:08 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
So, would I be right to assume MML tags in signatures are never
evaluated to begin with? Otherwise, there would still be a security
hole, no?
I am thinking of MML tags that a user puts in their own signature.
If that
11 matches
Mail list logo
