On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:42:36 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> It seems that we have officially notmuch 0.11 in Fedora 17/rawhide, if
> you have the latest stable Fedora 16, then you can use:
>
> yum --enablerepo=rawhide install notmuch notmuch-devel
>
> to get:
>
> $ rpm -q notmuch gmime
>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 02:31:39PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +, Darren McGuicken fernseed.info> wrote:
> > On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
> > >
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 02:31:39PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +, Darren McGuicken
mailing-notm...@fernseed.info wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante
peter.a.porta...@gmail.com wrote:
I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:42:36 +0100, Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote:
It seems that we have officially notmuch 0.11 in Fedora 17/rawhide, if
you have the latest stable Fedora 16, then you can use:
yum --enablerepo=rawhide install notmuch notmuch-devel
to get:
$ rpm -q notmuch gmime
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +, Darren McGuicken wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
> > able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under
> > Fedora 16.
>
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:36:59 +, Darren McGuicken
mailing-notm...@fernseed.info wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante
peter.a.porta...@gmail.com wrote:
I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
able to get the latest version of notmuch
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante wrote:
> I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
> able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under
> Fedora 16.
Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)
And it's nothing you're
Is there a good test suite for notmuch?
I'll take a crack at it using the latest 0.11 sources and see how far I get.
Thanks, -peter
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins <
jrollins at finestructure.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante <
>
Hello folks,
I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under
Fedora 16:
[pportant at frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.
CC -O2 debugger.o
In file
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:36:32 -0500, Peter Portante wrote:
> Is there a good test suite for notmuch?
Hey, Peter. Yes, there is a very good, extensive test suite for
notmuch. It can be run with "make test"
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante wrote:
> I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
> able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under
> Fedora 16:
>
> [pportant at frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
> Use "make V=1" to see the
Hello folks,
I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under
Fedora 16:
[pportant@frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
Use make V=1 to see the verbose compile lines.
CC -O2 debugger.o
In file
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante peter.a.porta...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under
Fedora 16:
[pportant@frodo notmuch-0.10.2]$ make
Use make
Is there a good test suite for notmuch?
I'll take a crack at it using the latest 0.11 sources and see how far I get.
Thanks, -peter
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:09:39 -0500, Peter Portante peter.a.porta...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am interested in using notmuch from within emacs, but have not been
able to get the latest version of notmuch (0.10.2) to compile under
Fedora 16.
Looks like we have a growing Fedora community, yay! :-)
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:36:32 -0500, Peter Portante peter.a.porta...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is there a good test suite for notmuch?
Hey, Peter. Yes, there is a very good, extensive test suite for
notmuch. It can be run with make test
jamie.
pgpwREjQW5rsd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
16 matches
Mail list logo
