John Lenz writes:
> Therefore, this patch adds an --include-html option that causes the
> text/html parts to be included as part of the output of show.
>
pushed,
d
John Lenz l...@math.uic.edu writes:
Therefore, this patch adds an --include-html option that causes the
text/html parts to be included as part of the output of show.
pushed,
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> Now, if we have --include-html should it be like that or
> --include-html=(true|false). Currently we have both cases, adding
> --verify, --decrypt, --create-folder, --batch, -no-hooks to the
> set... I cannot get a clear opinion (without wast^H^H^H^H
Hi
Overall I like this patch.
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18 2013, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, John Lenz wrote:
>>> On Sun Aug 4 14:47 -0500 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
The next question is should we have new option as
--include-html
Hi
Overall I like this patch.
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18 2013, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, John Lenz l...@math.uic.edu wrote:
On Sun Aug 4 14:47 -0500 2013, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
The next question
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
Now, if we have --include-html should it be like that or
--include-html=(true|false). Currently we have both cases, adding
--verify, --decrypt, --create-folder, --batch, -no-hooks to the
set... I cannot get a clear opinion (without
On Sun, Aug 18 2013, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, John Lenz wrote:
>> On Sun Aug 4 14:47 -0500 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>>> The next question is should we have new option as
>>>
>>> --include-html
>>>
>>> or as
>>>
>>> --include-html=(true|false)
>>>
>>> or even
>>>
>>>
On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, John Lenz wrote:
> On Sun Aug 4 14:47 -0500 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> The next question is should we have new option as
>>
>> --include-html
>>
>> or as
>>
>> --include-html=(true|false)
>>
>> or even
>>
>> --body=(true|false|text-and-html)
>>
>> See --exclude
On Sun Aug 4 14:47 -0500 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> The next question is should we have new option as
>
> --include-html
>
> or as
>
> --include-html=(true|false)
>
> or even
>
> --body=(true|false|text-and-html)
>
> See --exclude option in http://notmuchmail.org/manpages/notmuch-search-1/
On Thu, Jul 25 2013, John Lenz wrote:
> On Sun Jul 21 15:23 -0500 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 02 2013, John Lenz wrote:
>>
>> > For my client, the largest bottleneck for displaying large threads is
>> > exporting each html part individually since by default notmuch will not
>> >
On Sun Jul 21 15:23 -0500 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02 2013, John Lenz wrote:
>
> > For my client, the largest bottleneck for displaying large threads is
> > exporting each html part individually since by default notmuch will not
> > show the json parts. For large threads there
On Sun Jul 21 15:23 -0500 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02 2013, John Lenz wrote:
>
> > For my client, the largest bottleneck for displaying large threads is
> > exporting each html part individually since by default notmuch will not
> > show the json parts. For large threads there
On Tue, Jul 02 2013, John Lenz wrote:
> For my client, the largest bottleneck for displaying large threads is
> exporting each html part individually since by default notmuch will not
> show the json parts. For large threads there can be quite a few parts and
> each must be exported and decoded
For my client, the largest bottleneck for displaying large threads is
exporting each html part individually since by default notmuch will not
show the json parts. For large threads there can be quite a few parts and
each must be exported and decoded one by one. Also, I then have to deal
with all
14 matches
Mail list logo
