I think you guys may have a misunderstanding about how notmuch indexes
mail. Notmuch indexes multiple headers (To, From, Subject, Date) and
the *entire* body of the message. That's kind of the whole point. In
other words, messages don't have to have tags in order to be found.
[...]
Not
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:01:48 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
Now when you consistently label all your mails, you just don't want to
have unclassified mails. That is what we meant by mail you can't find.
It sounds like this would just as easily be accomplished with a way to
search
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:33:33 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
I agree that the function currently bound to space bar is annoying. I
am actually in the middle of preparing a patch to fix this. I think
that space should just scroll through the open messages. I don't want
it to archive anything,
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
This only works if you've already loaded notmuch, or you get error
messages about notmuch-search-mode-map not being known. How do you deal
with that or does it simply work for you?
I have:
(require 'notmuch)
in
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:13:26 -0500, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:01:48 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
Now when you consistently label all your mails, you just don't want to
have unclassified mails. That is what we meant by mail you
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:07:03 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
This only works if you've already loaded notmuch, or you get error
messages about notmuch-search-mode-map not being known. How do you deal
with that or does it simply work for you?
DOH, nothing that a (require 'notmuch) couldn't fix.
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
But the space bar removes the unread tag, so I do not see how it
helps... By default, hitting the space bar throughout a thread would
remove every tag from the thread, so you keep asking where was the mail
in my inbox
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:23:58 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
- Processing mails which do not have any automatically added tag is
boring, because I need to press several keys to archive them: + to
add a tag, and then a. If I forget about +, then my mail is
impossible to
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
Oh, and one other thing I forgot to mention about the patch. It
currently talks about things along the lines of git-style tests and
cworth-style tests.
You and I might understand perfectly well what that means now, but we
need the test suite to be
Break notmuch-test whenever a test script returns non-zero status.
This happens either when some test from the script fails or when there
is an error in the script.
This is especially useful in the latter case since the error may not
appear in the final aggregated results.
---
test/notmuch-test
---
test/from-guessing |1 +
test/search| 26 --
test/thread-naming |1 +
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/from-guessing b/test/from-guessing
index 8de543f..6744e68 100755
--- a/test/from-guessing
+++
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:52:51 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:04:16 -0800, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org
wrote:
Please don't! I use it all the time:
Thanks :).
This one is a simple one-liner as of notmuch 0.4:
notmuch search --output=files tag:deleted -print0 |
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
(hi list -- i'm new here; don't be afraid to explain things to me that
seem obvious to you, or correct my vocabulary if i'm using it wrong)
On 11/12/2010 08:11 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
But I suppose it's as simple a matter of creating a new
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:16:53 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
[*] This is a point I'm not clear on. Would a tool like offlineimap be
able to push custom filenames through to the remote end with standard
imap servers?
Not sure. If it worked this would be really nice. But as most IMAP
server support
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 22:34:38 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:35:22 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
But the space bar removes the unread tag, so I do not see how it
helps... By default, hitting the space bar throughout a thread would
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:21:26 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
Gmane is not good? I'm quite satisfied with the following in my .emacs:
(defun notmuch-show-stash-gmane ()
Copy a link to gmane archive of the current message to kill-ring.
(interactive)
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:24:09 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote:
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
my current understanding is that a not-uncommon use case is to have two
separate notmuch instances, synchronized by syncing maildirs and
tagsets. Would such a
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:21:41 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
This one is a simple one-liner as of notmuch 0.4:
notmuch search --output=files tag:deleted -print0 | xargs -0 rm
Having just switched from notmuchsync the synchronizing power of 0.5 and
being as how I'm
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:52:51 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
This one is a simple one-liner as of notmuch 0.4:
notmuch search --output=files tag:deleted -print0 | xargs -0 rm
Is -print0 actually a command that notmuch accepts? It's not documented
as far as I can tell. And it
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 17:23:57 -0800, Jeff Richards jricha...@revenuewire.com
wrote:
Having just switched from notmuchsync the synchronizing power of 0.5 and
being as how I'm missing the pruning feature I gave this a try and found
that I ended up with rm complaining that the file name length
> I think you guys may have a misunderstanding about how notmuch indexes
> mail. Notmuch indexes multiple headers (To, From, Subject, Date) and
> the *entire* body of the message. That's kind of the whole point. In
> other words, messages don't have to have tags in order to be found.
[...]
p magic is probably in order.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101114/efbb2d68/attachment.pgp>
t was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101114/8bc8ad8e/attachment.pgp>
nfig file before I add these keybinding.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101114/276b144d/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 14:13:26 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:01:48 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > Now when you consistently label all your mails, you just don't want to
> > have unclassified mails. That is what we meant by "mail you can't find".
>
> It sounds like
mail/notmuch/attachments/20101114/e0c234d4/attachment.pgp>
t was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101114/5ce93a85/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> Oh, and one other thing I forgot to mention about the patch. It
> currently talks about things along the lines of "git-style tests" and
> "cworth-style tests".
>
> You and I might understand perfectly well what that means now, but we
> need the test suite
The newline was removed from say_color in commit 222926ab to allow
printing test status in the beginning of the line. Error messages are
never followed by other text so we add the newline to error function.
---
test/test-lib.sh |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
Git-style tests (test_expect_success etc.) suppress stdout and stderr
unless -v is given. Notmuch-style tests (created by test_begin_subtest
and test_expect_equal) do not have this behavior so implement it the
same.
Additionally, for both test styles, the test-lib.sh is changed so that
the
Break notmuch-test whenever a test script returns non-zero status.
This happens either when some test from the script fails or when there
is an error in the script.
This is especially useful in the latter case since the error may not
appear in the final aggregated results.
---
test/notmuch-test
When test_begin_subtest is not followed by corresponding test_expect_equal,
the output of the rest of the test script is errornously suppressed. Add
code to detect these bugs in test scripts.
---
test/test-lib.sh |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
---
test/from-guessing |1 +
test/search| 26 --
test/thread-naming |1 +
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/from-guessing b/test/from-guessing
index 8de543f..6744e68 100755
--- a/test/from-guessing
+++
Adding three new conveneince functions:
notmuch-show-next-open-message-or-pop
notmuch-show-next-thread
notmuch-show-previous-thread
While these are not currently bound to any keys, I have found them to
be very useful for constructing custom key bindings outside of what
notmuch provides by
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> That was in this email:
>
> id:87vd4k6956.fsf at yoom.home.cworth.org
>
> And since we don't yet have a good web-based archive that lets you just
> plug in message IDs, I'll quote my reply here:
Gmane is not good? I'm quite satisfied with the
otmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101114/2397bf37/attachment.pgp>
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> (hi list -- i'm new here; don't be afraid to explain things to me that
> seem obvious to you, or correct my vocabulary if i'm using it wrong)
>
> On 11/12/2010 08:11 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
> > But I suppose it's as simple a matter of creating a new
ther (until I make it speak IMAP which I don't see coming in the near
future)
Sebastian
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermai
http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101114/77369e77/attachment.pgp>
uch-show-stash-gmane)
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101114/91191360/attachment.pgp>
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:24:09 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> > my current understanding is that a not-uncommon use case is to have two
> > separate notmuch instances, synchronized by syncing maildirs and
> > tagsets. Would such a thread-split be
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:21:41 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> This one is a simple one-liner as of notmuch 0.4:
> >
> > notmuch search --output=files tag:deleted -print0 | xargs -0 rm
>
Having just switched from notmuchsync the synchronizing power of 0.5 and
being as how I'm missing the
835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101114/4ddd0927/attachment.pgp>
signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20101114/afefd02a/attachment.pgp>
44 matches
Mail list logo
