Bastien bzg-whniv8geegkdnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org writes:
Is there a way to avoid notmuch asking this?
Found it: (setq notmuch-fcc-dirs nil)
Sorry for the noise,
--
Bastien
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
This variable is essentially unused: it was only used for making sure
it itself got reset after a refresh of the buffer.
It did this by passing an unnecessary argument to notmuch-pick-worker
so remove that too.
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el | 15 ---
1 files changed, 4
Previously pick had no actions based on the entire thread: this adds
some. Note in this version '*' is bound to `tag thread' which is not
consistent with search or show. However it still might be the most
natural thing (as it is similar to running * in the show pane).
---
This adds functions to go to the previous or next thread to
pick. Prev-thread behaves similarly to prev-message in show: if you
are on the top line of a thread it will go to the top of the previous
thread, otherwise it will go to the top of the current thread. Next
thread will always go to the top
This is a rebased version of
id:1372712861-13515-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com.
When documenting notmuch-pick-worker I realised that
notmuch-pick-buffer-name was an essentially unused argument: it is
only used to reset itself on refresh.
(Possibly this was a mis-copy from
This is a rebased version of
id:1371195472-441-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com
The only other change is a new patch 3 adding previous/next thread
commands: they are both very simple functions based on the first two
patches.
Best wishes
Mark
Mark Walters (3):
contrib: pick: add
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el
b/contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el
index f6710e9..30757c1 100644
--- a/contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el
+++
On Sun, Aug 25 2013, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a rebased version of
id:1372712861-13515-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com.
When documenting notmuch-pick-worker I realised that
notmuch-pick-buffer-name was an essentially unused argument: it is
only used
On Sun, Aug 18 2013, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
-typedef struct _notmuch_string_list notmuch_string_list_t;
-
anyway, would
typedef struct visible _notmuch_string_list notmuch_string_list_t;
have helped here (if yes is
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
Added (private) function `notmuch--prefix-bindings' which wraps
`describe-prefix-bindings' to provide more suitable user interface for
showing the key sequences that follow a particular notmuch prefix
keymap invocation.
The key '?'
Since the previous commit removed the sync parser we may as well
remove its tests too.
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/run-tests.sh |2 +-
contrib/notmuch-pick/test/emacs-pick-sync | 64 -
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
delete mode 100755
Pick has two possible parsing methods: a synchronous one (like show)
and an async one (like search). The async parser has been the default
since at least the time pick first entered contrib. I don't believe
there have been any reported problems with it during this time so we
might as well remove
Previously pick had the option of using an async parser like search or
a sync parser like show. The async parser has always been the default
and it seems fine so we can remove the sync one and the corresponding
defcustom.
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el | 36
On Mon, Aug 26 2013, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com wrote:
Pick has two possible parsing methods: a synchronous one (like show)
and an async one (like search). The async parser has been the default
since at least the time pick first entered contrib. I don't believe
there have been any
notmuch-show.el and notmuch.el had 3 duplicate, identical functions:
notmuch-foreach-mime-part, notmuch-count-attachments and
notmuch-save-attachments. Now these functions in notmuch-show.el
are replaced with declare-functions pointing to notmuch(.el).
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 39
v2 of this series is at
id:1377460214-4795-1-git-send-email-markwalters1...@gmail.com
v2 had a bug on refresh view (which I should have tested more). The
main pick view only worked by fluke as the initial call to pick-worker
was inside a let binding.
This version fixes the bug, moves the call to
This variable is essentially unused: it was only used for making sure
it itself got reset after a refresh of the buffer.
It did this by passing an unnecessary argument to notmuch-pick-worker
so remove that too.
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el | 25 +
1 files
A recent proposed patch was buggy when refreshing the view. Add a test
for refresh so that this does not reoccur.
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/test/emacs-pick | 11 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/notmuch-pick/test/emacs-pick
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el
b/contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el
index 5943ac2..7b13708 100644
--- a/contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el
+++
This LGTM +1
Mark
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
notmuch-show.el and notmuch.el had 3 duplicate, identical functions:
notmuch-foreach-mime-part, notmuch-count-attachments and
notmuch-save-attachments. Now these functions in notmuch-show.el
are replaced with
Hi all,
I have the following idea for a new feature. I'd implement it myself, but I
wanted to ask the list first, whether something like this would have a chance to
go into mainline (given that it is implemented cleanly, well documented etc.)
or if people wouldn't like it at all.
I suggest to
Johannes Kulick johan...@mailless.org writes:
An authors output format would not add redundant information to a mail, would
be
relatively easy to implement and I would find a people centric view - which
doesn't interfere with any other concept of notmuch - very worth the couple of
new lines
On Aug 27, 2013 3:27 AM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
Johannes Kulick johan...@mailless.org writes:
An authors output format would not add redundant information to a mail,
would be
relatively easy to implement and I would find a people centric view -
which
doesn't interfere with
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 09 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 08 2013, Geoffrey Ferrari
>> wrote:
>>
>>> From: "Geoffrey H. Ferrari"
>>>
>>> When composing a reply, notmuch-mua-reply tries to be smart and cite
>>> the original message by inserting it
On Sun, Aug 25 2013, Mark Walters wrote:
> This is a rebased version of
> id:1372712861-13515-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009 at gmail.com.
>
> When documenting notmuch-pick-worker I realised that
> notmuch-pick-buffer-name was an essentially unused argument: it is
> only used to reset itself
On Sun, Aug 18 2013, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>>>
>>> -typedef struct _notmuch_string_list notmuch_string_list_t;
>>> -
>>
>> anyway, would
>>
>> typedef struct visible _notmuch_string_list notmuch_string_list_t;
>>
>> have helped here (if yes is your
Pick has two possible parsing methods: a synchronous one (like show)
and an async one (like search). The async parser has been the default
since at least the time pick first entered contrib. I don't believe
there have been any reported problems with it during this time so we
might as well remove
Previously pick had the option of using an async parser like search or
a sync parser like show. The async parser has always been the default
and it seems fine so we can remove the sync one and the corresponding
defcustom.
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el | 36
Since the previous commit removed the sync parser we may as well
remove its tests too.
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/run-tests.sh |2 +-
contrib/notmuch-pick/test/emacs-pick-sync | 64 -
2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
delete mode 100755
v2 of this series is at
id:1377460214-4795-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009 at gmail.com
v2 had a bug on refresh view (which I should have tested more). The
main pick view only worked by fluke as the initial call to pick-worker
was inside a let binding.
This version fixes the bug, moves the call
This variable is essentially unused: it was only used for making sure
it itself got reset after a refresh of the buffer.
It did this by passing an unnecessary argument to notmuch-pick-worker
so remove that too.
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el | 25 +
1 files
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el
b/contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el
index 5943ac2..7b13708 100644
--- a/contrib/notmuch-pick/notmuch-pick.el
+++
A recent proposed patch was buggy when refreshing the view. Add a test
for refresh so that this does not reoccur.
---
contrib/notmuch-pick/test/emacs-pick | 11 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/contrib/notmuch-pick/test/emacs-pick
This LGTM +1
Mark
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> notmuch-show.el and notmuch.el had 3 duplicate, identical functions:
> notmuch-foreach-mime-part, notmuch-count-attachments and
> notmuch-save-attachments. Now these functions in notmuch-show.el
> are replaced with declare-functions
Johannes Kulick writes:
> An authors output format would not add redundant information to a mail, would
> be
> relatively easy to implement and I would find a people centric view - which
> doesn't interfere with any other concept of notmuch - very worth the couple of
> new lines of code.
>
>
35 matches
Mail list logo
