Re: bug: "no top level messages" crash on Zen email loops

2018-03-28 Thread Olly Betts
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:03:21PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > I can confirm this reproduces both the xapian-check and the notmuch-show > error. Olly agrees that whatever notmuch is doing wrong, it shouldn't > lead to a corrupted database There was a Xapian bug here, which I fixed on master

Re: New Python bindings (was: Crash with Python bindings)

2018-03-28 Thread David Bremner
Brian May writes: > David Bremner writes: > >> We tried this before, and it didn't work out very well. Bindings tend to >> depend on a strict matching of versions with the underlying library, so >> distributing them seperately doesn't really make

Re: New Python bindings (was: Crash with Python bindings)

2018-03-28 Thread Brian May
David Bremner writes: > We tried this before, and it didn't work out very well. Bindings tend to > depend on a strict matching of versions with the underlying library, so > distributing them seperately doesn't really make sense to me. You need > the underlying libraries, so

Re: New Python bindings (was: Crash with Python bindings)

2018-03-28 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
On Wed, Mar 28 2018, David Bremner wrote: > Brian May writes: > >> I can into this thread late. However, my priorities for python bindings >> would be: > > [...] >> * Packages should be available from pypi.python.org >> > > We tried this before, and it didn't work out

Re: New Python bindings (was: Crash with Python bindings)

2018-03-28 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
On Wed, Mar 28 2018, Brian May wrote: > Justus Winter writes: > >>> This is exactly what I have fixed in my alternative bindings which I >>> created around the end of last year [0]. So we do have an idea of how >>> to fix this, at the time I said I do believe that it's

Re: New Python bindings

2018-03-28 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
On Wed, Mar 28 2018, Justus Winter wrote: > Floris Bruynooghe writes: > >> On Wed, Mar 21 2018, Justus Winter wrote: >>> >>> Floris Bruynooghe writes: >>> This is exactly what I have fixed in my alternative bindings which I created around the end of

Re: [PATCH] lib: bump LIBRARY_MINOR_VERSION

2018-03-28 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Tue, Mar 27 2018, David Bremner wrote: > We added several new functions, at least > >notmuch_database_get_default_indexopts >notmuch_database_index_file >notmuch_indexopts_destroy >notmuch_indexopts_get_decrypt_policy >notmuch_indexopts_set_decrypt_policy >

Re: New Python bindings (was: Crash with Python bindings)

2018-03-28 Thread David Bremner
Brian May writes: > I can into this thread late. However, my priorities for python bindings > would be: [...] > * Packages should be available from pypi.python.org > We tried this before, and it didn't work out very well. Bindings tend to depend on a strict matching of

Re: New Python bindings (was: Crash with Python bindings)

2018-03-28 Thread Brian May
Justus Winter writes: >> This is exactly what I have fixed in my alternative bindings which I >> created around the end of last year [0]. So we do have an idea of how >> to fix this, at the time I said I do believe that it's possible to also >> do this for the existing