---
swig/Makefile| 18
swig/notmuch.py | 222 ++
swig/notmuch_funcs.i |9 ++
3 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 swig/Makefile
create mode 100644 swig/notmuch.py
create mode 100644 swig/no
Hey all,
Here's the latest version of my patch adding SWIG interface generation to
notmuch. It has been rebased on the shared-library patches I sent over earlier
this week, so you'll need those as well. Unfortunately, SWIG has effectively no
support for exposing notmuch's C-style object-oriented
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:26:11 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach
> does 2 things: it requires the prefix 'date:' and it allows timestamps
> to be specified as , MM or MMDD. So a notmuch show
> date:2005..20060512 will fin
On Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:26:11 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
wrote:
> Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach
> does 2 things: it requires the prefix 'date:' and it allows timestamps
> to be specified as , MM or MMDD. So a notmuch show
> date:2005..20060512 will fin
}
+return notmuch_one_date(text, first, last, 0);
+}
+
+#if 1
+int
+main (int argc, char **argv)
+{
+inti;
+for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
+ time_t first, last;
+
+ if (notmuch_date(argv[i], &first, &last) == 0) {
+ charfirst_string[80], last_string[80];
+
+ ctime_r(&first, first_string);
+ first_string[strlen(first_string)-1] = '\0';
+ ctime_r(&last, last_string);
+ last_string[strlen(last_string)-1] = '\0';
+ printf ("%s: %s - %s\n", argv[i], first_string, last_string);
+ }
+}
+}
+#endif
--
1.6.6
--
keith.packard at intel.com
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/1fa59cc1/attachment-0001.pgp>
Excerpts from Simon Cozens's message of Mon Jan 25 13:17:16 -0500 2010:
> (Resent with compressed patch)
>
> Hi there,
> Here's a Perl library, Mail::Notmuch, which wraps the notmuch library.
> I've attached it because it's pretty huge. It requires you to
> build notmuch as a shared library -
Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Sat Jan 16 15:49:55 -0500 2010:
> To fascilitate this, two new functions should be implemented at the
> notmuch CLI level, so that things don't get fractured by different
> mail reader implementations:
>
> notmuch purge
>
> delete all 'delete' tagged m
Inger in #notmuch brought to light some build issues that will occur when the
notmuch binary is being built before libnotmuch is installed. Here is an
updated patch that resolves these issues.
---
.gitignore |1 +
Makefile |1 +
Makefile.local |6 --
lib/Make
For the record, both the swig branch and the shared-library branch are
available from,
anonymous: git://goldnerlab.physics.umass.edu/notmuch
gitweb: http://goldnerlab.physics.umass.edu/git?p=notmuch.git;a=summary
Hope this helps,
- Ben
___
notmuch
- emma goldman
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/0c16410d/attachment.pgp>
---
swig/Makefile| 18
swig/notmuch.py | 222 ++
swig/notmuch_funcs.i |9 ++
3 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 swig/Makefile
create mode 100644 swig/notmuch.py
create mode 100644 swig/no
Hey all,
Here's the latest version of my patch adding SWIG interface generation to
notmuch. It has been rebased on the shared-library patches I sent over earlier
this week, so you'll need those as well. Unfortunately, SWIG has effectively no
support for exposing notmuch's C-style object-oriented
Excerpts from Simon Cozens's message of Mon Jan 25 13:17:16 -0500 2010:
> (Resent with compressed patch)
>
> Hi there,
> Here's a Perl library, Mail::Notmuch, which wraps the notmuch library.
> I've attached it because it's pretty huge. It requires you to
> build notmuch as a shared library -
Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Sat Jan 16 15:49:55 -0500 2010:
> To fascilitate this, two new functions should be implemented at the
> notmuch CLI level, so that things don't get fractured by different
> mail reader implementations:
>
> notmuch purge
>
> delete all 'delete' tagged m
hat.
Notmuch else to say, really. Enjoy.
Simon
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Mail-Notmuch-perl.patch.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 55832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/9
plicate the current
behavior):
[tags]
* = +inbox,+unread
I would love to see this. Hopefully we can rally some more support for
this idea.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/4b013ce3/attachment.pgp>
> I think it would make sense to move the mainline to git.debian.org
> for now, or another place where everyone can easily get an account.
> As alternatives I propose repo.or.cz. I'd prefer to stay away from
> commercial services like Github.
Any of those sounds fine to me, really. No preferences.
> I think it would make sense to move the mainline to git.debian.org
> for now, or another place where everyone can easily get an account.
> As alternatives I propose repo.or.cz. I'd prefer to stay away from
> commercial services like Github.
Any of those sounds fine to me, really. No preferences.
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft
wrote:
> I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
> used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync should
> be used if people wanted flags represented in Maildir filenames.
While notmuchsync fullfils my ne
Sorry, very last mail from me on this issue. I squashed the patches into
3 distinct ones, and inherited a tree from cworth's master tree for
easier pulling (rather than basing it off my all-features branch). This
branch is here:
http://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature/commits/dateparser2
(
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:17:16 +, Simon Cozens
wrote:
> (Resent with compressed patch)
>
> Hi there,
> Here's a Perl library, Mail::Notmuch, which wraps the notmuch library.
> I've attached it because it's pretty huge. It requires you to
> build notmuch as a shared library - there's a pa
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:22:47 -0500 (EST), Mike Kelly wrote:
> Similarly, provide a mechanism for correlating the folder name with
> some set of tags, and change those tags as messages are moved around.
>
> For example, I might have:
>
> ~/.notmuch-config:
>
> [database]
> path=/ho
achment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/6a70e84f/attachment.pgp>
also sprach Carl Worth [2010.01.23.1010 +1300]:
> Anyway, I'll be on vacation for the next few days, so will likely
> not have much, (likely have not much?), time for patch merging.
>
> But I *am* anxious to get back to the backlog. And in the
> meantime, I really appreciate others merging and sh
The patch previously sent can be considered my final attempt to a nicer
date parser. In addition to some testing, I have updated the
documentation to reflect the new syntax, and I have also added the
keyword 'now' as a possibility. So 'date:2002..now' (all mails from 2002
until now) or 'date:now..
i?bug=564830
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100125/71216e90/attachment-0001.pgp>
also sprach Jameson Rollins [2010.01.17.0949
+1300]:
> I would like to put forth here a proposal for a couple of changes
> to notmuch that I believe will considerably streamline message
> handling and new message flow through notmuch. Notmuch is still
> new and I believe it hasn't quite figured
Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach does 2
things:
1) it requires the prefix 'date:'
2) it allows dates to be specified in a flexible way. So a notmuch show
date:2005..2006-05-12 will find all mails from 2005-01-01 until 2006-05-12.
Possible time formats: -MM-D
also sprach Sebastian Spaeth [2010.01.26.0249 +1300]:
> While notmuchsync fullfils my needs, it is a kludge. It needs to
> call "notmuch" for each mail where a MailDir flag has changed
> (which can be quite often on an initial run, where most mails are
> likely to be read), this can take a long, l
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:49:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft
> wrote:
> > I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
> > used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync should
> > be used if people wante
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:17:16 +, Simon Cozens wrote:
> (Resent with compressed patch)
>
> Hi there,
> Here's a Perl library, Mail::Notmuch, which wraps the notmuch library.
> I've attached it because it's pretty huge. It requires you to
> build notmuch as a shared library - there's a pat
Hey, folks. I'm being killed by the slowness of {,un}tagging in notmuch
on Debian, which, as I understand it, comes from a xapian bug that has
been fixed upstream (all of which has been discussed quite a bit on this
list). A request for an upload of a new xapian verion that fixes the
bug has been
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:49:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth"
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft
> wrote:
> > I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
> > used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync should
> > be used if people want
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:46:59 +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> I think we all kinda agreed that the Maildir flags should not be
> used by notmuch and that things like Sebastian's notmuchsync should
> be used if people wanted flags represented in Maildir filenames.
While notmuchsync fullfils my nee
Sorry, very last mail from me on this issue. I squashed the patches into
3 distinct ones, and inherited a tree from cworth's master tree for
easier pulling (rather than basing it off my all-features branch). This
branch is here:
http://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature/commits/dateparser2
The patch previously sent can be considered my final attempt to a nicer
date parser. In addition to some testing, I have updated the
documentation to reflect the new syntax, and I have also added the
keyword 'now' as a possibility. So 'date:2002..now' (all mails from 2002
until now) or 'date:now..
Currently we have to enter mail dates as timestamps. This approach does 2
things:
1) it requires the prefix 'date:'
2) it allows dates to be specified in a flexible way. So a notmuch show
date:2005..2006-05-12 will find all mails from 2005-01-01 until 2006-05-12.
Possible time formats: -MM-D
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.21.1928
> +1300]:
>>> I suppose that I never actually considered merges on the IMAP server
>>> side, but obviously the IMAP server has to work off a clone, and that
>>> means it needs to merge.
>>
>> It's not "me
38 matches
Mail list logo
