On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 08:57:40PM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:31:13 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > Hi, folks. I've been following this thread a bit and I wanted to put
> > in my argument that using Bcc is *NOT* the way to
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Marten Veldthuis wrote:
> There's a message-send-hook, which we should probably use. Something
> like:
>
> (add-hook 'message-send-hook 'notmuch-always-bcc-sender)
> (defun notmuch-always-bcc-sender ()
> (message-add-header (concat "Bcc: "
>
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 07:22:55PM +0100, Marten Veldthuis wrote:
There's a message-send-hook, which we should probably use. Something
like:
(add-hook 'message-send-hook 'notmuch-always-bcc-sender)
(defun notmuch-always-bcc-sender ()
(message-add-header (concat Bcc:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:16:20PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:57:37 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > - install contrib/notmuch-completion.bash \
> > + install -m0644 contrib/notmuch-completion.bash \
> &g
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:12:47PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> Handling --prefix will be a nice addition to our configure script. So,
> thanks!
Yeah, it's definitely needed for the Debian packaging as well.
> Your commit message has that flag word of "also" in it, and as it turns
> out, the
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 01:01:17PM -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> In general, I think it would be really good to put together some
> documentation about all the ways that users can customize the notmuch
> interface. I would be willing to help with that as well. It would
>
Hey, Carl et. al. The recent improvements to the notmuch emacs mode
look great. I have a couple of suggestions/questions about the UI
that I wanted to put to the group.
Here are some things that I would really like to see:
* in thread view, show read messages as initially collapsed
* show
Hey, Carl et. al. The recent improvements to the notmuch emacs mode
look great. I have a couple of suggestions/questions about the UI
that I wanted to put to the group.
Here are some things that I would really like to see:
* in thread view, show read messages as initially collapsed
* show
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:12:47PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
Handling --prefix will be a nice addition to our configure script. So,
thanks!
Yeah, it's definitely needed for the Debian packaging as well.
Your commit message has that flag word of also in it, and as it turns
out, the removal of
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:16:20PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:57:37 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
- install contrib/notmuch-completion.bash \
+ install -m0644 contrib/notmuch-completion.bash \
$(DESTDIR
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:04:52PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> The notmuch-folder command is definitely a nice primary interface to
> notmuch for some people. I'm seriously considering making it the view
> that one gets with "M-x notmuch" (after the notmuch-folder view gets a
> little sprucing up).
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 05:04:52PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
The notmuch-folder command is definitely a nice primary interface to
notmuch for some people. I'm seriously considering making it the view
that one gets with M-x notmuch (after the notmuch-folder view gets a
little sprucing up).
I
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:41:36AM -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:00:09 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > Hi, folks. I know it's a hairy problem, but has anyone started
> > looking into OpenPGP support for notmuch?
>
> I defin
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:06:34AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Actually, since Carl is a DD now, I've already nudged him about
> maintaining a Debian package, and offered to help. Perhaps your work
> will provide additional motivation. ;-)
Yeah, I realized that Carl and Keith are I think both
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 03:33:14PM -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote:
> This is the beginning of a test suite. It uses the Check[1] unit
> testing framework to handle the testing. There are basic tests of the
> SHA1 and tag manipulation routines, obviously many more will need to
> be added.
Hey,
---
Makefile.local |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.local b/Makefile.local
index 1744747..b818627 100644
--- a/Makefile.local
+++ b/Makefile.local
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ install: all notmuch.1.gz
done ;
install notmuch
---
configure | 14 +-
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index ab28fa3..1010799 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -63,6 +63,15 @@ else
errors=$((errors + 1))
fi
+if printf 'int main(){return 0;}' | gcc -x c -lz -o
This also removes the Makefile.config from the repository, since it
shouldn't be kept in the repository and should be created by the
configure script.
---
Makefile.config |3 ---
configure | 12 +++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:38:01PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K. V wrote:
> message-mode can sign the message using C-c RET C-s
> which is mml-secure-message-sign
Thanks so much, Aneesh! That's great. I was not aware of those
abilities in mml mode. I just noticed that epa-mail-{sign,encrypt}
can do
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 08:00:09AM -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Hi, folks. I know it's a hairy problem, but has anyone started
> looking into OpenPGP support for notmuch?
Hey, folks. I wanted to try to follow up on this question.
I would really like to start using notmuch with
Hi, folks. I know it's a hairy problem, but has anyone started
looking into OpenPGP support for notmuch?
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 05:24:53PM -0500, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> I totally agree with Jamie about the config rename. I don't know if I
> agree with the database location change... but I might just need some
> convincing.
So I don't really like having the database stored in the maildir.
There
22, 2009 at 04:58:36PM -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> This change creates a ~/.notmuch config directory where the config
> file is stored when created with the "setup" command. The use of a
> ~/.notmuch config directory creates one place where all notmuch config
> files
This change creates a ~/.notmuch config directory where the config
file is stored when created with the "setup" command. The use of a
~/.notmuch config directory creates one place where all notmuch config
files and data can be stored, which will greatly simplify managing
notmuch, and reduce
This fixes a small bug in notmuch_setup_command such that it returned
OK and output the setup message footer even if the config file write
step failed.
---
notmuch-setup.c | 13 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch-setup.c b/notmuch-setup.c
index
Modified ./configure script to generate a Makefile.config if it
doesn't exist. This will allow people to maintain custom
Makefile.config files without causing conflicts with the repository.
---
Makefile.config |2 --
configure |8
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2
Hi, folks. I just recently heard about notmuch and am very excited by
it. It looks like exactly what I've been waiting years for. Also
excited to see so much good development work happening.
I started playing around with notmuch today and I have a suggestion
about the notmuch config files and
1601 - 1627 of 1627 matches
Mail list logo