This fixes a visual glitch during a silent compile.
Before:
Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.\n CC debugger.o
CCgmime-filter-reply.o
After:
Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.
CCdebugger.o
CCgmime-filter-reply.o
Signed-of
This fixes a visual glitch during a silent compile.
Before:
Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.\n CC debugger.o
CCgmime-filter-reply.o
After:
Use "make V=1" to see the verbose compile lines.
CCdebugger.o
CCgmime-filter-reply.o
Signed-of
Hello.
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 19:55, Michiel Buddingh' wrote:
> Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > > This function should interpret the flags that it finds and return a
> > > suitable set of notmuch tags. I'd suggest that 'unread' messages get
> > >
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 16:28, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:11:00 +0100, Stefan Schmidt datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
>
> > +const char *
> > +notmuch_message_get_flags (notmuch_message_t *message)
>
> This function should interpret the flags
With the new notmuch_message_get_flags() function we can get the information if
a message was already flagged as seen in maildir by another mailer or tool. This
gives a more realistic picture instead of flagging all as unread.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt
---
Makefile |2 +-
notmuch
With notmuch_message_get_flags() we gain the information if the message was
flagged as read, draft, trashed, etc. Handy for big mail spooles that were used
with another mailer.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt
---
lib/message.cc | 26 ++
lib/notmuch.h | 10
>From 4bb598e6e0fa32d5184be54cb5c66fe364eba374 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Holger Freyther
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:45:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] notmuch-config: Fix memleaks.
While talloc is great we need to free the g_error by hand.
Tested-by: Stefan Schmidt
Signed-off-by: Holger Freyt
Hello.
[Resend, first one missed the list]
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 14:14, Bart Trojanowski wrote:
> * Stefan Schmidt [091121 14:06]:
> > IMHO it would be best to do the development inside the main tree. You could
> > use
> > branches there too and it would be easier to
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:07, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:51:11 +0100, Stefan Schmidt datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
> > Disclaimer: I'm using vim, in combination with mutt for email, for years,
> > but
> > never dealt with emacs. Please have th
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:26, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:36:55 +0100, Stefan Schmidt datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
>
> > In my case only 80 messages were printed before the gap. All of them had a
> > wrong
> > year in the timestamp. 1900 and 197
s nice of Keith to share this with everyone. And it's nice of all
> you to come take a look at things.
Getting it out now was a good move. It had enough code to actually do omething
usefull and many people waited for something like this. The increasing number of
contributors in such a short time shows it very well. :)
regards
Stefan Schmidt
here too and it would be easier to find and test. And as notmuch is
still under heavy development its not a problem that the vim interface is as
well.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 08:12, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Sadly that takes around 25 minutes here on an Intel Core2Duo notbeook
> > (Thinkpad
> > X200s). I tried this several times now. CPU load was low (~10
some debugging myself if I get
some hints where to look.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
14 matches
Mail list logo