On Sat, Jan 03 2015, "W. Trevor King" wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:49:27PM +0100, David Bremner wrote:
>> At the risk of bike-shedding, rewrite the configure check to be more
>> "obvious". This is pretty subjective, but in particular I'm not a
>> big fan of resetting RST2MAN at the bottom
Tomi Ollila writes:
> I'd presume anyone else using such an old system will have bigger
> problems getting their notmuch compiled (recent enough zlib being one
> of those), so this makes me wonder whether there is actually anyone
> needing rst2man there (besides me, of course :)
I guess the orig
From: "W. Trevor King"
Gentoo's dev-python/docutils-0.10 installs Docutils scripts with a
*.py extension, so I have /usr/bin/rst2man.py and no rst2man script.
This patch supports users with both types of systems by checking for
rst2man, falling back on rst2man.py, and giving up only if neither is
From: W. Trevor King
Gentoo's dev-python/docutils-0.10 installs Docutils scripts with a
*.py extension, so I have /usr/bin/rst2man.py and no rst2man script.
This patch supports users with both types of systems by checking for
rst2man, falling back on rst2man.py, and giving up only if neither is
f
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 07:12:13PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> … so this makes me wonder whether there is actually anyone needing
> rst2man there…
Requiring Sphinx >= 1.0 (2010-07-23 [1]) to build man pages is fine
with me.
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Sphinx/1.0
--
This em
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 07:12:13PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> ? so this makes me wonder whether there is actually anyone needing
> rst2man there?
Requiring Sphinx >= 1.0 (2010-07-23 [1]) to build man pages is fine
with me.
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Sphinx/1.0
--
This em
Tomi Ollila writes:
> I'd presume anyone else using such an old system will have bigger
> problems getting their notmuch compiled (recent enough zlib being one
> of those), so this makes me wonder whether there is actually anyone
> needing rst2man there (besides me, of course :)
I guess the orig
On Sat, Jan 03 2015, "W. Trevor King" wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:49:27PM +0100, David Bremner wrote:
>> At the risk of bike-shedding, rewrite the configure check to be more
>> "obvious". This is pretty subjective, but in particular I'm not a
>> big fan of resetting RST2MAN at the bottom
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:49:27PM +0100, David Bremner wrote:
> At the risk of bike-shedding, rewrite the configure check to be more
> "obvious". This is pretty subjective, but in particular I'm not a
> big fan of resetting RST2MAN at the bottom of every iteration of the
> for loop. Also conform
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 04:49:27PM +0100, David Bremner wrote:
> At the risk of bike-shedding, rewrite the configure check to be more
> "obvious". This is pretty subjective, but in particular I'm not a
> big fan of resetting RST2MAN at the bottom of every iteration of the
> for loop. Also conform
From: "W. Trevor King"
Gentoo's dev-python/docutils-0.10 installs Docutils scripts with a
*.py extension, so I have /usr/bin/rst2man.py and no rst2man script.
This patch supports users with both types of systems by checking for
rst2man, falling back on rst2man.py, and giving up only if neither is
From: W. Trevor King
Gentoo's dev-python/docutils-0.10 installs Docutils scripts with a
*.py extension, so I have /usr/bin/rst2man.py and no rst2man script.
This patch supports users with both types of systems by checking for
rst2man, falling back on rst2man.py, and giving up only if neither is
f
12 matches
Mail list logo
